รูปแบบการจัดการโซ่อุปทานวิสาหกิจชุมชนกลุ่มสินค้าเกษตรอย่างยั่งยืน
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14456/nrru-rdi.2020.11Keywords:
Supply chain management, Enterprise community, Agricultural productsAbstract
The objective of this research to study the relationship model of supply chain management for community enterprises in sustainable agricultural groups. The population of this research 1,447,678 community enterprise entrepreneurs in Thailand and the sample group in this research were entrepreneurs of community in Suphanburi province, 10 districts, 369 places, a total of 6,167 members by specifying the sample size of 384 people. The key of informants, including the supervisor and the president or representative of the agricultural which divided into 3 levels, 4 persons for each level which are good level, middle level and improve level and customers of agricultural products 10 people. The research tools for collecting data were interview forms and questionnaires. The questionnaire with the reliability of 0.80 and test data using techniques for the structural equation model.
The research found that supply chain management through the success of the community enterprise has the most coefficient (α=0.98) the results of operations with statistical significance at the level of 0.05. The success of sustainability in agricultural products will manage from the group, collaborating within leaders and members to bring culture in communities and the private sector and managing everything from initial product planning to product delivery to customer needs. The important thing of the community enterprise group is to the quality of the products of the group. The management of agricultural community enterprise products that are still submitted, the group must be able to adjust the group's operations on time.
References
Community Development Department Ministry of Interior. (2017). Guidelines for Establishing and Developing Occupational Group. Bangkok : Style Creative House. (In Thai)
Cronbach, L. J. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing (5th ed.). New York : Harper Collins Publishers.
Hair Jr., J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ : Prentice Hall.
Inwang, K. & Sithongphim, W. (2008). The Management system development of small and medium enterprise with sufficiency economy philosophy. Funding research report of National Research Council of Thailand. Bangkok : National Research Council of Thailand. (In Thai)
Kanlayanamit, P. (2015). Sustainable development of the Nordic countries. Faculty of Political Science Law Kalasin University. (In Thai)
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). “The Balanced Scorecard: Measures that Drive Performance, in: Harvard Business Review, January-February 1992.” Putting the balanced scorecard to work (1992).
Kotler, P. (2004). Marketing Management (11th ed.). New Jersey : Prentice Hall.
Likert, R. (1967). The Method of Constructing and Attitude Scale. New York : Wiley & Son.
Office of the Prime Minister. (2016). Announcement of National Economic and Social Development Plan Part 12(A.D. 2017-2021). Bangkok : Office of the National Economic and Social Development Board. (In Thai)
Phuaphongsakon, N., et al. (2010). Study of guidelines for supply chain management and logistics of agricultural products. Thailand Development Research Institute. Bangkok. (In Thai)
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage. New York : The Free Press.
Prasitratsin, S. (2012). Research Methodology in Science. Bangkok : Samlada. (In Thai)
Royal Thai Government Gazette. (2019). National Strategy is a national development (2018-2037). Book 135 Part 82 A. 13 October 2019. (In Thai)
Schumacher, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (1996). A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
