THE STUDY OF APPLICATION OF BLOCK CHAIN TECHNOLOGY IN FOREIGN COURTS

Authors

  • JADSADA SORRANAWIT Siam University
  • CHALERMKIAT WONGVANICHTAWEE มหาวิทยาลัยสยาม
  • RATHAVOOT RUTHANKOON มหาวิทยาลัยสยาม

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/nrru-rdi.2021.2

Keywords:

Foreign court of justice, Block chain technology, Application

Abstract

The advantages of applying the block chain technology in foreign justice courts are the development of 1) workplace administration management system by using an electronic system in improving a stable and reliable security system to legally authorize including the development system specialists to support the application, 2) justice court coordination process among internal/external organizations, such as the determination of cases in type, size, and difficulty, and the investigation, 3) technology including improving and employing verification technology and signature examination, 4) each section website in the justice court to conduct contents to others, especially laws relating to the justice courts, and 5) block chain technology to cut down on process and to gain the efficiency in the justice court’s administration management, electronic case administration system or electronic government contact. By integrating central database system to collect, restore, exchange, and connect to justice court's information in the digital government to establish an international language and pattern of accuracy in the same standardized platforms, budget distribution for sufficient provision and up-to-date maintenance continuously. Those will not only reduce the risks of technical errors, but also increase the potential of digital proficiency belonging to those who involve in all digital information technology levels according to empirically factual information.

References

Anderson, J. E. (2011). Public Policy-Making: An Introduction (7thed.). Boston, MA : Cengage.

Bruns, H. J. (2013). Accounting change and value creation in public services do relational archetypes make a difference in improving public service performance? Critical Perspectives on Accounting. Public Management Review, 6(3), 331-348.

Chadkrabuanpol, S. (2012). Court system and general principles on judicial procedure. Bangkok : Thammasat Publishing. (In Thai)

Chuenchitsiri, C. (2017). Academic explanation (4th ed.). Bangkok : Winyuchon. (In Thai)

Chuttur, M. Y. (2009). Overview of the Technology Acceptance Model: Original, Developments and Future Directions. Sprouts : Working Papers on Information Systems.

Crosby, M., Pattanayak, P., Verma, S., & Kalyanaraman, V. (2016). Blockchain Technology : Beyond Bitcoin. Applied Innovation, 2(6-10), 71.

Deloitte, P. (2018). Blockchain in Public Sector: Transforming Government Services through Exponential Technologies (pp. 1-28). India : Deloitte Tohmatsu Limited.

Ekblaw, A., Azaria, A., Vieira, T., & Lippman, A. (2016). MedRec: Medical Data Management on the Blockchain. In 2016 2nd International Conference on Open and Big Data (OBD), 22-24 August 2016. Austria : Vienna.

Graglia, J. M., & Mellon, C. (2018). Blockchain and Property in 2018: At the End of the Beginning. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 12(1-2), 90-116.

He, H., & Baruch, Y. (2009). Transforming organizational identity under institutional change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 22(6), 575-599.

Iansiti, M., & Lakhani, K. R. (2017). The Truth AboutBlockchain. Harvard Business Review, 95(1), 118-127.

Nilthongkam. (2019). Code of Civil Procedure Criminal procedure Statute of the Court of Justic Version 1. 62. Bangkok : Athaya Millennium. (In Thai)

Office of National Digital Economy and Society Commission. (2018). National Digital Economy and Society Development Plan and Policy (2018-2037). Bangkok : Ministry of Digital Economy and Society. (In Thai)

Office of the National Economic and Social Development Conuncil. (2020). Economic and Social Development. Retrieved January 9, 2020, from http://www.nesdb.go.th/default.aspx (In Thai)

Office of the Public Sector Development Commission. (2019). Public Sector Management Quality Award. Bangkok : Office of the Public Sector Development Commission. (In Thai)

Shrier, D., Wu, W., & Pentland, A. (2016). Blockchain & infrastructure (identity, data security). Massachusetts Institute of Technology-Connection Science, 1(3), 1-19.

Thikhauttmakron, S. (2018). Complete Statute of the Court of Justice (3rd ed.). Bangkok : Law Book Store. (In Thai)

Vayupab, P. (2016). Explanation of the Court System and the Statute of the Court of Justice (12th ed.). Bangkok : Winyuchon. (In Thai)

Vayupab, P. (2017). Explanation of the Court System and the Statute of the Court of Justice (13th ed.). Bangkok : Winyuchon. (In Thai)

Wooten, K. C. (2009). Ethics and justice in new paradigm and postmodern organization development and change. In Research in organizational change and development. N. P. : Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Wuttisil, K. (2017). Guidelines for decision-making to use blockchain technology. Thesis, Master of Science Program in Computer Science, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok. (In Thai)

Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H. N., Chen, X., & Wang, H. (2018). Blockchain challenges and opportunities: A survey. International Journal of Web and Grid Services, 14(4), 352-375.

Downloads

Published

2021-01-04

How to Cite

SORRANAWIT, J., WONGVANICHTAWEE, C., & RUTHANKOON, R. (2021). THE STUDY OF APPLICATION OF BLOCK CHAIN TECHNOLOGY IN FOREIGN COURTS. Research Community and Social Development Journal, 15(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.14456/nrru-rdi.2021.2

Issue

Section

Academic Articles