PROBLEMS WITH IMPRISONMENT AND FINES FOR OFFENCES OF FOREST ENCROACH MENTACCORDING TO THE FORESTS ACT, B.E. 2484 (1941)

Authors

  • Matawarin Jamnongtham Faculty of Law, Eastern University of Management and Technology
  • Tiwawan Ayuwat Faculty of Law, Eastern University of Management and Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/nrru-rdi.2022.65

Keywords:

Penalty, Imprisonment, Adjust, Offense of forest encroachment, Mitigation

Abstract

    Analysis of the Act is another significant process to improve legal measures to be more effective. Therefore, the purposes of research are to 1) study problems of imposing imprisonment and fines on the offense of deforestation and 2) study problems of enforcing extenuating circumstances according to the Penal Code, and 3) seek measures relating to imposing imprisonment and fines on the offense of deforestation to be guidelines for effectively amending the Forest Act B.E. 2484 (1941). This was documentary research along with the interview. 12 samples were selected by purposive sampling. The structured interview questionnaire were approved for human research ethics. The data was collected by employing unofficial in-depth interviews, analyzed by analyzing elements, classifying, and systemizing the data. The research revealed that 1) the penalty for deforestation was imprisonment of not exceeding five years or a fine of not exceeding fifty thousand Baht. Most of the key informants deemed that imprisonment and fine rates should be increased. The minority of key informants deemed that imprisonment and fine rates were appropriate. Some of them deemed penalties should be lessened. 2) Enforcing extenuating circumstances according to the Penal Code to the Forest Act B.E. 2484 (1941) was appropriate and not necessary to be amended and 3) measures acquired were to increase imprisonment and fine rates or adjust them to be proportionate to the damage. Therefore, the law would be able to suppress offenders of deforestation cases if penalties were amended to increase in order to reduce the offense of deforestation cases.

References

A1. (2021, 16 July). Researcher in Facalty of Law. Interview. (In Thai)

A2. (2021, 15 July). Population. Interview. (In Thai)

A3. (2021, 15 July). Population. Interview. (In Thai)

A4. (2021, 15 July). Population Interview. (In Thai)

A5. (2021, 15 July). Village hadman. Interview. (In Thai)

A6. (2021, 7 July). Professional forestry scholar. Interview. (In Thai)

A7. (2021, 8 July). Justice. Interview. (In Thai)

A8. (2021, 14 July). Director of Legal Affairs Division. Interview. (In Thai)

A9. (2021, 7 July). Deputy Superintendent (Investigation). Interview. (In Thai)

A10. (2021, 7 July). Deputy Inspector (Investigation). Interview. (In Thai)

A11. (2021, 7 July). Deputy Inspector (Investigation). Interview. (In Thai)

A12. (2021, 7 July). Deputy Inspector (Investigation). Interview. (In Thai)

Athiwer, A. (2015). Theory of Criminology and the Criminal Justice System (2nd ed.). Bangkok : V.J. Printing. (In Thai)

Dhutinan, A. (2014). Criminology and Penology (2nd ed.). Bangkok : Winyuchon. (In Thai)

Forest Resources Management Office 7, Ubon Ratchathani Branch. (2017). Account of forest intrusion case 2017-2021. (Mineographed) (In Thai)

Forestresources. (2021). Forest knowledge. Retrieved December 22, 2021, from http://forestclass55. blogspot.com/2017/02/blog-post.html (In Thai)

Limprasert, S., Saengchansri, S., & Manathon, A. (2019). Criminal Offenders’ Punishment. In National Research Conference, Rangsit University, 26 April 2019 (pp. 1484-1493). Bangkok : Rangsit Univertsity. (In Thai)

Office of the Council of State. (1941). Forest Act. B.E. 1941. Retrieved March 13, 2021, from http://web.krisdika.go.th/data/law/law2/%BB26/%BB26-20-9999-update.pdf (In Thai)

Office of the Council of State. (1956). Criminal Code, 1956. Retrieved March 22, 2021, from http://www.hydro.navy.mi.th/download/Criminal_Code.pdf (In Thai)

Office of the Council of State. (1964). National Reserved Forests Act 1964. Retrieved March 13, 2021, from https://www.hrdi.or.th/public/files/About/02-Regulations/04-Others/07-OtherRules2507.pdf (In Thai)

Office of the Council of State. (1992). Wildliife Preservation and Protection Act, B.E. 2535. Retrieved March 13, 2021, from http://web.krisdika.go.th/lawHeadPDF.jsp?formatFile=pdf&hID=0 (In Thai)

Office of the Council of State. (2017). Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand B.E. 2560. Retrieved March 13, 2021, from https://www.krisdika.go.th/librarian/get?sysid=774606&ext=pdf (In Thai)

Oonchom, L. (2017). The Suitable Sentencing to the Offender of Norcotic Drugs. Thesis, Master of Laws Program in Department of Law, Pridi Banomyong Faculty of Law, Dhurakij Pundit University, Bangkok. (In Thai)

Pinitkanwattanakul, T. (2004). Court is mitigation reasoning under Article 78 of the Criminal Code. This personal academic paper is part of the course training “judge of the court of first instance”. Institute for Judicial Development of the Court of Justice. (In Thai)

PsycNET. (2018). Why do we punish? Deterrence and Just Deserts as motives for punishment. Retrieved March 22, 2021, from http:/psycnet.apa.org/buy/2002-17391-00

Sankosik, U. (1980). Criminal Law Part 1. Bangkok : Ruenkaewprinting. (In Thai)

Srisanit, P. (2018). High Criminal Law (2nd ed.). Bangkok : Winyuchon. (In Thai)

Summary report Summary-Department of National Parks. (2021). Summary of Forest lllegal Reports of agencies under the Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation, fiscal year 2009-2002. Retrieved February 18, 2022, from http://115.31.166.198/DNP/ FileSystem/download?uuid=1ac1c467-8773-4742-9175-c052088fb385.pdf (In Thai)

Suttiyotin, N. (2011). Theory of Punishment. Educational Documents, Criminal Law and Advaced Criminology Course Set, Unit 6. Nonthaburi : Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University. (In Thai)

The Chaipattana foundation. (2021). Theory of Forest Restoration Development under the Royalinitia tive. Retrieved March 19, 2021, from https://www.chaipat.or.th/concept-and-theory-development/theory-developed-forest-restoration.html (In Thai)

Woraphat, T. (2014). Criminal Enforcement Measures. Bangkok : Winyuchon. (In Thai)

ภาพ 1 กรอบแนวคิดการวิจัย

Downloads

Published

2022-12-02

How to Cite

Jamnongtham, M., & Ayuwat, T. (2022). PROBLEMS WITH IMPRISONMENT AND FINES FOR OFFENCES OF FOREST ENCROACH MENTACCORDING TO THE FORESTS ACT, B.E. 2484 (1941). Research Community and Social Development Journal, 16(4), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.14456/nrru-rdi.2022.65

Issue

Section

Research Articles