THE EFFECT OF USING COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING INSTRUCTION INTEGRATED WITH THE FLOWCHART TECHNIQUE IN ENGLISH GRAMMAR ABILITY ON GRADE 9 STUDENTS AT SCHOOLS UNDER THE SECONDARY EDUCATIONAL SERVICE AREA OFFICE, CHONBURI-RAYONG
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14456/nrru-rdi.2023.26Keywords:
Communicative language teaching (CLT), Flowchart technique, English grammar ability, English grammatical learning attitudeAbstract
The objectives of this research were to 1) compare English grammar ability of grade 9 students before and after learning through communicative language teaching (CLT) instruction integrated with the flowchart technique (experimental group), 2) compare English grammar ability of experimental group to that of students learning through the traditional method (controlled group), and 3) compare the attitudes of the experimental group towards English grammar learning before and after learning. The research sample in this study consisted of 84 students in grade 9. The research instruments were 1) CLT instructional plans with the highest level of appropriateness evaluation results, 2) traditional method plans with the highest level of appropriateness evaluation results, 3) an English grammar ability test with difficulty (P) ranging from 0.27 to 0.60; discrimination power (r) ranging from 0.36 to 0.74; and reliability of 0.86, and 4) a questionnaire to assess students' attitudes toward grammar learning with all items' IOC higher than 0.50. The experiment was carried out by the researcher, who also collected the data. The statistics used for data analysis were the mean, standard deviation, and t-test. The findings revealed that 1) English grammar ability of experimental group was significantly higher than their pre-learning counterpart score at the 0.01 level of statistical significance, 2) English grammar ability of the experimental group was higher than controlled group, and 3) English grammar learning attitudes of the experimental group were significantly higher than before learning at the 0.01 level of statistical significance. Which, demonstrates the ability to interact with classmates.
References
Angsilapittayakom School. (2023). Methodology and results report according to the international standard school quality award criteria (ScQA) of the year 2023. Chonburi : The Office of the Secondary Education Service Area Chonburi-Rayong. (In Thai)
Brown, H. D., & Lee, H. (2015). Teaching by Principles; An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. United States : Pearson Education.
Chanaroke, U., & Niemprapan, L. (2020). The Current Issues of Teaching English in Thai Context. EAU Heritage Journal Social Science and Humanity, 10(2), 34-45. (In Thai)
Dos Santos, L. M. (2020). The Discussion of Communicative Language Teaching Approach in Language Classrooms. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 7(2), 104-109. https://doi:10.20448/journal.509.2020.72.104.109
Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Attitudes and Motivation: Second Language Learning. Massachusetts : Newbury House.
Jumlongpeng, P. (2019). Activities for learning English reading comprehension using a graphical diagram for students in grade 8. Thesis, Master of Education Program in Curriculum and Instruction, Rajabhat Maha Sarakham University, Maha Sarakham. (In Thai)
Khaira, L. (2020). Improving Students’ Grammatical Competence by Using Cyclic Pre-Communicative and Communicative Activities. Thesis, Master of Bahasa dan Sastra Program in Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2001). Teaching language: From grammar to grammaring. Boston, MA : Heinle & Heinle.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2011). Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching (3rd ed.). New York : Oxford University Press.
McClelland, D. C. (1953). The Achievement Motive. New York : Appletoncetury Crofts.
Ministry of Education. (2018). Basic Education Core Curriculum 2008 (Revised 2017). Retrieved January 16, 2023, from http://opec.go.th/ckfinder/userfiles/files/general/123(2).pdf (In Thai)
Mukhtarovn, D., & Borisovna, K. (2020). Features of the Formation of Grammatical Competence. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies (IJPSAT), 20(2), 121-125.
Nanquil, L. M. (2021). Changes and Challenges in the Teaching of Grammar in the Age of Disruption. Journal of Learning and Development Studies, 1(1), 01-06. https://dx.doi.org/10.32996 /jlds.2021.1.1.1
Novak, J. D., & Canas, A. J. (2006). The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct Them (Technical Report No. IHMC CmapTools 2006-01). Pensacola, FL : Institute for Huan and Machine Cognition.
Odiliobi, O. J. (2021). APPLICATION OF FLOWCHART IN TEACHING SIMPLE INTEREST TO SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS; A PANACEA FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. COOU Journal of Educational Research, 6(1), 301-325.
Pahlevy, M. (2010). Pengertian Flowchart dan Definisi Data. England : Cambridge University Press.
Patria, L., Sudarsono, S., & Rosnija, E. (2020). the Use of Wall Charts As Media To Teach Vocabulary. Journal of English Educational Study (JEES), 3(2), 169-177.
Phomjui, S. (2020). Techniques for Project Assessment (7th ed.). Bangkok: Dan Suttha Phim. (In Thai)
Phuwarat, C., & Boonchukusol, N. (2020). The Role of Grammar Teaching In ESL Writing. Sripatum Chonburi Journal, 16(4), 1-9. (In Thai)
Rosiva, S. S. (2019). Using Flowchart Technique to Improve Students' Understanding on Indefinite and Definite Articles. Dissertation, Doctoral of Educaiton Program in Faculty of Education and Teacher Training, Ar-Raniry State Islamic University, Indonesia.
Rossiter, A. (2021). A Descriptive Grammar of English: Modern English grammar by example. N. P. : Independently published.
Shimchuk, A. O. (2021). BASIC PRINCIPLES OF COMMUNICATIVE GRAMMAR DURING ENGLISH LESSONS AT PRIMARY SCHOOL. Science and Education, 2(2), 365-369.
Syukur, A., & Wahyono, E. (2021). The Use of Flowchart in Improving Students’ Ability in Writing Paragraph. Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, 8(1), 269-275.
The Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology. (2014). STEM Learning Activities. Bangkok : The Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology. (In Thai)
Ur, P. (2009). Grammar Practice Activities: A Practical Guide for Teachers (2nd ed.). England : Cambridge University Press.

Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.