The Critical Discourse Analysis of the Political Movement of the Student and the People (2020)

Main Article Content

Orraya Anukul
Phichai Ratnatilaka Na Bhuket

Abstract

This research aims to examine the relationship between linguistic dimensions and social dimensions in order to explore political discourse in counter hegemony from the political movement phenomena of the student and the people in 2020. This study used the qualitative research methodology through the framework of Norman Fairclough’s  Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) which encompasses 3 dimensions: 1) text, 2) discursive practice, and 3) socio-cultural practice. The data for the analysis is the texts of 10 protesters' leaders, collected from speeches, interviews with the media, television appearances, participation in academic seminars, and participation in clarifications at meetings of the House of Representatives. Additionally, the secondary data include the texts from groups holding state power and groups opposing protest movements, derived from interviews with the media and various official statements, for analysis.


            The results of the study found that following the 2014 coup,  reconfiguration of power occurred, impacting political, economic, and social dimensions, particularly exacerbating economic inequalities and social injustices, which led to the emergence of the 2020 political movement. Furthermore, ten alternatives discourses were discovered, existing as embodiments of thought through language and used as crucial tools in the struggle. These discourses reveal embedded political ideologies within the texts from both the protesters, namely ‘liberal democracy’, and the groups holding state power and those opposing protest movements, namely, ‘monarchist conservatism’ and ‘authoritarian conservatism’.

Article Details

How to Cite
Anukul, O., & Ratnatilaka Na Bhuket, P. (2024). The Critical Discourse Analysis of the Political Movement of the Student and the People (2020). Journal of Social Development and Management Strategy, 26(2), 39–63. Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jsd/article/view/271540
Section
บทความวิจัย Research Article

References

Adamson, W. L. (1980). Hegemony and Revolution AStudy of Antonio Gramsci's Political and Cultural Theory. University of California Press.

Angkapanichkit, J. (2019). Discourse Analysis [In Thai] (2th ed.). Thammasat University.

BBC NEWS Thai. (2021). From coup leders to the 7-year civilian prime minister, Gen. Prayut Chanocha, and the dynamics of power seizure, relaxation, and consolidation. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/thai/thailand-57196551

Charoensinolarn, C. (2013). Language and politics/The Political [In Thai] (2th ed.). Vibhasazine.

Charoensinolarn, C. (2018). Power Unbound: Language, Discourse, Everyday Life and the Changing World [In Thai]. Vibhasazine.

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. Longman.

ILAW. (2019). Speeches from the Parliament: The NCPO inherits power, not as discourse but as a formality. Retrieved from https://ilaw.or.th/node/5287

Matichon News Agency. (2021). Thailand Records 2020 [In Thai]. Matichon.

Matichon TV. (2020, October 31). Listen, Penguin proclaimed boldly, ‘A cage may confine a star, but it can never confine its light’ [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OyJNgDdRmag

Matthaweewong, T. (2016). The critical discourse analysis of “returning happiness to the people” TV program [In Thai]. [Master’s thesis]. Thammasat University.

Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council reveals that Thailand’s wealth inequality has surged over the past decade, with the richest becoming 20 times wealthier than the poorest. Household debt relative to GDP has surpassed 80 percent. (2020, September 22). Matichon Online. Retrieved from

https://www.matichon.co.th/economy/news_2359806

Panpothong, N. (2013). Critical Discourse Analysis in Linguistics: Concepts and Studies of Discourse in the Thai Language [In Thai] (2th ed.). Chulalongkorn University.

Pansuwan, C., & Samukkethum, S. (2019). Analyzing Thai student movements in the period of political turmoil 2006-2014 [In Thai]. Journal of Social Development, 21(2), 216-234.

Phimmasri, R. (2020, November 12). Mind Passarawalee: If the government asks when will it stop, Prayut will resign, let’s talk then [In Thai]. Prachachat Online. Retrieved from https://www.prachachat.net/d-life/news-552809

Preechamat, P. (2020). I am not afraid of ‘them’ because all humans are equal: Phai Daodin shares his life story of continuing to fight against injustice after being released from prison [In Thai]. Retrieved from

https://nisitjournal.press/2020/11/09/pai-jatupat-interview/

Ratnatilaka Na Bhuket, P. (2020, February 28). The movement of students [In Thai]. MGR Online. Retrieved from https://mgronline.com/daily/detail/9630000020003?fbclid=IwAR1Tli-

Senthong, P. (2019). The political ideology: Thai political ideology [In Thai]. Journal of Graduate Studies Valaya Alongkorn Rajabhat University, 13(3), 230-248.

Srisunt, S. (2018). On Critical Discourse Analysis [In Thai]. Sommodhi.

Sriraksasin, P., & Phujeenapan, P. (2020). The section 44 as the hegemonizing apparatus of the national council for peace and order (NCPO) government [In Thai]. Political Science and Public Administration Journal, 11(1), 171-188.