Strong community and industrial conflict management in Khlong Tha Chang Community, Surat Thani
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research article aims to study the role of social capital in sustainable natural resource management in the Tha Chang Canal community, Tha Chang District, Surat Thani Province. It analyzed the relationships and collaboration between the community and the industrial sector and explored mechanisms for resolving environmental conflicts. A qualitative research approach was employed, collecting data through in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, and on-site observations. The findings revealed that social capital played a crucial role in establishing cooperative networks, uniting the community, and strengthening internal group dynamics. The community formed an Environmental Protection Committee to manage natural resources and mitigate the impacts of industrial activities. The relationship between the community and the industrial sector had both positive and negative aspects. On the positive side, industrial facilities supported community activities, such as distributing relief supplies during the COVID-19 crisis and providing local employment opportunities. However, on the negative side, the community faced environmental issues, such as water pollution and noise from industrial operations, leading to skepticism about the factories’ activities. Conflict resolution mechanisms included creating spaces for dialogue, joint meetings between the community, factories, and government agencies, and promoting conservation activities such as reforestation and fish restocking. Continuous participation and communication were essential in reducing conflicts and fostering mutual trust. This study highlights that integrating social capital, fostering collaboration among stakeholders, and receiving support from governmental agencies are critical factors in the sustainable management of natural resources in the Khlong Tha Chang community. It also provides recommendations for enhancing multi-sectoral cooperation to achieve balanced and sustainable community development.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Agrawal, A., & Gibson, C. C. (1999). Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development, 27(4), 629-649. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00161-2
Armitage, D., & Braddick, M. (2009). The British Atlantic world, 1500-1800. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Berkes, F., Kislalioglu, M., Folke, C., & Gadgil, M. (1998). Minireviews: Exploring the basic ecological unit: Ecosystem-like concepts in traditional societies. Ecosystems, 1, 409-415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100219900036
Biddle, B. J., & Biddle, L. E. (1965). Behavioral sciences: A survey. Harper & Row.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press.
Cashore, B. W., Auld, G., & Newsom, D. (2004). Governing through markets: Forest certification and the emergence of non-state authority. Yale University Press.
Cohen, J. M., & Uphoff, N. T. (1980). Participation place in rural development: Seeking clarity through specificity. World Development. Cornell University.
Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand B.E. 2560. (2017, April 6). Royal Thai Government Gazette, 134(Part 40 A), 1-90. https://www.ratchakitcha.soc.go.th
Delbecq, A. L., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1971). A group process model for problem identification and program planning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 7(4), 466–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/002188637100700404
Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the pluriverse: Radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Duke University Press.
Etzioni, A. (1993). The spirit of community: The reinvention of American society. Touchstone Books.
Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press.
Gadgil, M., & Guha, R. (1992). Indian forestry: Socio-economic context. In Status of Indian forestry: Problems and perspectives (p. 107).
Kasriwichai, N. (2024). The success of collaborative network of natural resource conservation of Ban Mae Tung Ting Village, Mae Sap Sub-district, Samoeng District, Chiang Mai Province. Public Administration Association of Thailand Journal, 6(1), 109-120.
Mahathian, J. (2016). Natural resources and environmental management. Journal of Educational Review, 3(2), 129-141.
Obaom, P., & Ongkasinha, C. (2024). Green industries and factories for eco-industrial development in Thailand. Journal of Dhamma for Life, 30(3), 441-455.
Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council. (2019). Annual development report 2019. https://www.nesdc.go.th
Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council. (2020). Annual development report 2020.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
Pawala, T., & Soonthornchai, P. (2018). Model of creating sustainable food security of households in NongMek Sub-District, Nachueak District, MahaSarakham Province. Journal of Research and Development Institute, 5(1), 143-154.
Phetuthai, K. (2021). Participation and mechanisms in local community natural resource management: A case study of Tha Chang Canal, Tha Chang District, Surat Thani Province [Final research report]. Surat Thani Rajabhat University.
Phetuthai, K. (2023). Participation and mechanisms in local community natural resource management: A case study of Tha Chang Canal, Tha Chang District, Surat Thani Province. Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovation Review, 6(5), 14-26.
Pho-boon, C. (2007). Community participation in natural resources and environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 3(1), 141-174.
Phraphraethong Kaewthongmee (Santimano), Theeraphong Meethaisong, & Chalong Phanchan. (2024). Community adaptation using social and cultural capital in water resource management in the Upper Siew Yai River Basin. The Journal of Research and Academics, 7(5), 355-369.
Pretty, J. N. (2003). Social capital and the collective management of resources. Science, 302(5652), 1912-1914. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1090847
Pretty, J., & Ward, H. (2001). Social capital and the environment. World Development, 29(2), 209-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00098-X
Putnam, R. D. (1993). The prosperous community. The American Prospect, 4(13), 35-42.
Samakkitam, S. (2016). Accountability and public administration. Romphruek Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 34(1), 41–79.
Samakkitam, S. (2024). Partnership for driving SDGs: Theoretical consideration. Burapha Journal of Political Economy, 12(1), 52–86.
Sanguandee, S. (2021). Social capital and community development. Journal of Future Academic Studies, 1(1), 1-8.
Setyawan, B. (2019). Pengaruh good corporate governance, ukuran perusahaan dan profitabilitas terhadap kinerja keuangan perusahaan (Studi empiris terhadap perusahaan sektor perbankan di Bursa Efek Indonesia). Jurnal Mitra Manajemen, 3(12), 1195-1212.
Tanintayangkul, N., & Promjuk, W. (2020). Social capital and development dimension. Journal of Research and Development Institute, 10(2), 485-494.
Tha Chang Municipality Office. (2024). Frontpage. https://www.thachangcity.go.th/frontpage
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment
Vroom, V. H., & Deci, E. L. (1970). Management and motivation. Penguin Books Ltd.
Woolcock, M. (2001). The place of social capital in understanding social and economic outcomes. Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2(1), 11-17.
