Dynamics of Cybersecurity and Challenges to Civil Liberties in the Digital Era

Main Article Content

Jirawat Sriruang

Abstract

This academic article explores the dynamic relationship between state-led cybersecurity measures and the protection of individual freedoms in the digital era a relationship that is inherently complex and challenging. It analyzes how global and national responses to cyber threats, particularly in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks and within the current digital landscape, have increasingly granted governments broader powers to monitor, surveil, and regulate online activities through laws and control mechanisms. Such measures directly impact fundamental rights, including privacy, freedom of expression, and freedom of information. The article underscores the critical importance of maintaining a balanced and sustainable approach between security and liberty, grounded in the principles of the rule of law, transparency, necessity, and proportionality of rights restrictions. This balance is essential to prevent the abuse of state power and to preserve a democratic society that respects citizens’ rights and freedoms. Failure to sustain this equilibrium risks eroding public trust and diminishing the value of freedom in the digital realm.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sriruang, J. . (2025). Dynamics of Cybersecurity and Challenges to Civil Liberties in the Digital Era. Journal of Social Development and Management Strategy, 27(2), 210–226. retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jsd/article/view/281568
Section
บทความวิชาการ Viewpoint

References

Amnesty International. (2018, July 16). Egypt: Cybercrime law is a fresh assault on freedom of expression. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2018/07/egypt-proposed-laws-an-assault-on-online-freedoms/

Bennett, C. J., & Raab, C. D. (2006). The governance of privacy: Policy instruments in global perspective. Ashgate Publishing.

Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. (2012). Official Journal of the European Union, C 326, 391–407.

Creemers, R. (2017, June 29). Translation: Cybersecurity law of the People's Republic of China (effective June 1, 2017). DigiChina, Stanford University. https://digichina.stanford.edu/work/translation-cybersecurity-law-of-the-peoples-republic-of-china-effective-june-1-2017/

Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand, B.E. 2560 (2017). Government Gazette, 134(40a), 1–98.

European Commission. (2020). What are your rights under the GDPR? https://commission.europa.eu/law/law-topic/data-protection/information-individuals_en

European Court of Justice. (2016, December 21). Joined Cases C-203/15 and C-698/15, Tele2 Sverige AB v Post- och telestyrelsen and Secretary of State for the Home Department v Tom Watson and Others [Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber)]. http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?docid=186492

Freedom House. (2021). Freedom on the net 2021: India. https://freedomhouse.org/country/india/freedom-net/2021

Freedom House. (2023). Freedom on the net 2023: United States. https://freedomhouse.org/country/united-states/freedom-net/2023

Freedom House. (2024). Freedom on the net 2024: The struggle for trust online. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-net/2024/struggle-trust-online

Greenwald, G. (2014). No place to hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. surveillance state. Metropolitan Books.

Human Rights Watch. (2016, July 7). Russia: Big brother law harms security, rights. https://www.hrw.org/news/2016/07/07/russia-big-brother-law-harms-security-rights

Human Rights Watch. (2020, February 26). Thailand: Cyber crime act tightens internet control.

https://www.hrw.org/news/2020/02/26/thailand-cyber-crime-act-tightens-internet-control

Human Rights Watch. (2025, July 30). Russia: Internet blocking, disruptions and increasing isolation. https://www.hrw.org/news/2025/07/30/russia-internet-blocking-disruptions-and-increasing-isolation

iLaw. (2019). Cybersecurity Act, Section 60: Authorizes the NCSA to access information without a court warrant. http://ethesisarchive.library.tu.ac.th/thesis/2023/TU_2023_6101032511_18977_28857.pdf

Kostka, G. (2019). China's social credit systems and public opinion: Explaining high levels of approval. New Media & Society, 21(7), 1565–1593. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819826402

Lyon, D. (2003). Surveillance after September 11. Polity Press.

Pew Research Center. (2019, November 15). Americans and privacy: Concerned, confused and feeling lack of control over their personal information. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2019/11/15/americans-and-privacy-concerned-confused-and-feeling-lack-of-control-over-their-personal-information/

The Standard. (2019, December 25). Russia successfully tests disconnection from global internet system, aims to enhance domestic internet efficiency. https://thestandard.co/russia-successfully-disconnected-from-the-internet/

The Moscow Times. (2025, July 22). Explained: How Russia is cracking down on the internet and messaging apps.

https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2025/07/22/explained-how-russia-is-cracking-down-on-the-internet-and-messaging-apps-a89893

The Jamestown Foundation. (2024, November 25). Russia ramps up internet censorship. https://jamestown.org/program/russia-ramps-up-internet-censorship/

Voigt, P., & Von dem Bussche, J. (2017). The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A practical guide. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 8(1), 71-87.

Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.