Incorporating Visualisation in Qualitative Retrospective Interviews to Elucidate Temporality: A Methodological Illustration of L2 Motivational Dynamics
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper illustrates the development of a visual-based qualitative retrospective approach to data collection that enables learners to reflect on and uncover developmental trajectories in language acquisition. Often, interviews are used in applied linguistics research to encourage participants to reflect retrospectively on their learning; however, they may be ineffective at capturing temporality because of recall bias. To address this limitation, art-based methods are claimed to enhance participants’ retrospection. We illustrate their use in a study designed to depict learners’ mental self-visions across motivational trajectories. With the dynamic turn in applied linguistics research, Dörnyei’s (2009) Second Language (L2) Motivational Self System opens up new possibilities for examining learners’ motivation as a temporally focused trajectory. To capture the temporal sensitivity of motivational dynamics, we designed visual imagery drawing tasks and integrated visual motivation graphs into narrative interviews to trace self-guide development and to collect L2 learning experiences retrospectively. This methodological design contributes to our understanding of how participants interpret the past and navigate their futures, while providing a methodological blueprint that researchers can use to adopt similar methods in retrospective interviewing. Although self-report data collection methods such as interviews offer participants sufficient freedom to express their experiences, incorporating referential visual aids alongside verbal accounts may enhance the overall trustworthiness of retrospective accounts of learning over time.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).References
Begić, I., & Mercer, S. (2017). Looking back, looking forward, living in the moment: Understanding the individual temporal perspectives of secondary school EFL learners. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 11(3), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2017.1317261
Chan, L., Dörnyei, Z., & Henry, A. (2014). Learner archetypes and signature dynamics in the language classroom: A retrodictive qualitative modelling approach to studying L2 motivation. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 238–259). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783092574-018
Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The L2 motivational self system. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9–42). https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691293-003
Dörnyei, Z. (2014). Researching complex dynamic systems: ‘Retrodictive qualitative modelling’ in the language classroom. Language Teaching, 47(1), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000516
Dörnyei, Z. (2019). Towards a better understanding of the L2 learning experience, the Cinderella of the L2 motivational self system. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2019.9.1.2
Dörnyei, Z., & Chan, L. (2013). Motivation and vision: An analysis of future L2 self images, sensory styles, and imagery capacity across two target languages. Language Learning, 63(3), 437–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12005
Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1959). Motivational variables in second-language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 13(4), 266–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0083787
Henry, A. (2014). The dynamics of possible selves. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 83–94). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783092574-011
Henry, A., & Liu, M. (2023). Can L2 motivation be modelled as a self-system? A critical assessment. System, 119, Article 103158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103158
Henry, A., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2024). Keeping in time: The design of qualitative longitudinal research in SLA. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 3(1), Article 100102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2024.100102
Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.319
Hiver, P., & Papi, M. (2019). Complexity theory and L2 motivation. In M. Lamb, K. Csizér, A. Henry, & S. Ryan (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of motivation for language learning (pp. 117–137). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28380-3_6
Kostoulas, A., & Mercer, S. (2016). Fifteen years of research on self & identity in System. System, 60, 128–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.04.002
Lamb, M. (2011). Future selves, motivation and autonomy in long-term EFL learning trajectories. In G. Murray, X. Gao, & T. Lamb (Eds.), Identity, motivation and autonomy in language learning (pp. 177–194). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847693747-013
Latham, G., & Ewing, R. (2018). Generative conversations for creative learning: reimagining literacy education and understanding. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60519-7
Li, Z., & Liu, Y. (2023). Theorising language learning experience in LOTE motivation with PERMA: A positive psychology perspective. System, 112, Article 102975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102975
Magid, M., & Chan, L. (2012). Motivating English learners by helping them visualise their Ideal L2 Self: Lessons from two motivational programmes. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2011.614693
Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954–969. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.9.954
Mello, Z. R., Worrel, F. C., & Andretta, J. R. (2009). Variation in how frequently adolescents think about the past, the present, and the future in relation to academic achievement. Journal of Childhood and Adolescence Research, 4(2), 173–183. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-334563
Melo-Pfeifer, S. (2015). Multilingual awareness and heritage language education: Children’s multimodal representations of their multilingualism. Language Awareness, 24(3), 197–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2015.1072208
Taguchi, T., Magid, M. & Papi, M. (2009). The L2 motivational self system among Japanese, Chinese and Iranian learners of English: A comparative study. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Ed.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 66–97). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691293-005
Thompson, A. S., & Vásquez, C. (2015). Exploring motivational profiles through language learning narratives. The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 158–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12187
Thorsen, C., Henry, A., & Cliffordson, C. (2017). The case of a missing person? The current L2 self and the L2 motivational self system. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23(5), 584–600. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1388356
Ushioda, E. (2019). Researching L2 motivation: Re-evaluating the role of qualitative inquiry, or the ‘wine and conversation’ approach. In A. Al-Hoorie & P. MacIntyre (Eds.), Contemporary language motivation theory: 60 years since Gardner and Lambert (1959) (pp. 194–211). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781788925204-014
Verspoor, M. H., de Bot, K., & Lowie, W. (Eds.). (2011). Dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.29
Wang, J., Henry, A., Liu, M., & Thomas, N. (2025). The adjustment processes of international students at a UK university: An exploration using the L2 self-regulatory system. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2025.2570842
Waninge, F., Dörnyei, Z., & De Bot, K. (2014). Motivational dynamics in language learning: Change, stability, and context. The Modern Language Journal, 98(3), 704–723. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12118