Politics of Hotspot and Uncertainties in Space and Time of the “FireD” System: A Case Study on Forest Fire and Haze Pollution in Chiang Mai 2022

Authors

  • Chaya Vaddhanaphuti -

Keywords:

FireD, forest fire, haze pollution, uncertainty, Chiang Mai

Abstract

Since 2021, Chiang Mai province has switched their wildfire and haze pollution management approach from a complete banning of open burning to authorizing burning under an optimal weather condition and allowable number of hotspots. The process is carried out under scientific consensus of the committee of “Chiang Mai's Command Centre for Wildfires and PM2.5 Prevention” through a decision support system called “FireD”. This research applies concepts of uncertainty and political geography to study the mechanism and efficiency of wildfire and haze pollution management through FireD system. From fieldwork during February to May 2022 to enquire villagers (N=11), officers (N=11) and independent researchers (N=3) in Omkoi, Mae On and Chiang Dao districts of Chiang Mai about experiences of using FireD, results show that the “FireD” system is an integrated system that is flexible for its users. The new system encourages much more systemic planning of fire management between villagers and local authorities. At the same time, however, users experienced biophysical, managerial, and technological uncertainties, as well as politics of hotspots. This resulted in disruption of the rhythm of prescribed burning and injustice toward those who whose fire is a necessity in life but lack knowledge and technological negotiating power. Moreover, uncertainties in rain and management approach disrupts. Importantly the “FireD” system has epistemological and practical limitation in solving wildfire and haze problem that are in themselves transboundary issue since its authority can only be implemented within the territory of Chiang Mai province.

References

กรมป้องกันและบรรเทาสาธารณภัยจังหวัดเชียงใหม่. (ม.ม.ป.). แผนปฏิบัติการประจำเดือน มีนาคม 2565 (เอกสารไม่ตีพิมพ์).

ชยา วรรธนะภูติ. 2564. “ว่าด้วยชีวิตทางสังคม ชีวิตทางวิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี และชีวิตทางการเมองของ “การเปลี่ยนแปลงสภาพภูมิอากาศ” ในมนุษยสมัย.” In Anthropocene: บทวิพากษ์มนุษย์และวิกฤตสิ่งแวดล้อมในยุคสมัยแห่งทุน, บรรณาธิการ เก่งกิจ กิติเรียงลาภ. กรุงเทพฯ: ศูนย์มานุษยวิทยาสิรินธร.

ปิ่นแก้ว เหลืองอร่ามศรี. 2564. “ย้อนคิดมโนทัศน์ความไม่แน่นอนกับความเสี่ยงในสังคมทันสมัย.” วารสารธรรมศาสตร์ 40(3): 1-32.

http://tujournals.tu.ac.th/thammasatjournal/detailart.aspx?ArticleID=7915.

มัทนา ปัญญาคํา และพิชญ์ พงษ์สวัสดิ์. 2564. “พัฒนาการนโยบายไฟป่าและหมอกควัน: กรณีศึกษานโยบายไฟป่าและหมอกควัน จ.เชียงใหม่.” วารสารการบริหารปกครอง 10(1): 408-446. https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/gjournal-ksu/article/view/245770.

ศุทธินี ดนตรี. ประเทศไทยไร้หมอกควัน: เหลียวมองนโยบายและแนวทางแก้ไขปัญหา. สมาคมส่งเสริมความรอบรู้ด้านสุขภาพไทย. http://doh.hpc.go.th/data/PM25/thailandNoSmog.pdf.

ศุทธินี ดนตรี, สตรีรัตน์ จุมพิศ, และชณัฐฎา แสงงาม. 2561. การติดตามและประเมินผลการจัดการและแก้ไขปัญหาพื้นที่เผาไหม้และหมอกควันในจังหวัดเชียงใหม่ พ.ศ. 2561. สำนักงานคณะกรรมการการวิจัยแห่งชาติ (วช.).

สภาลมหายใจเชียงใหม่. 2563. “ด่านสำคัญพิสูจน์ “เชียงใหม่โมเดล” เกิดได้หรือไม่?”. สืบค้นเมื่อ 12 เมษายน 2565. https://breathcouncil.org/แนวทางบริหารจัดการไฟ-ชู/.

สวรินทร์ เบ็ญเด็มอะ. 2560. “เหลียวหลัง แลหน้า กับวิกฤตไฟป่าของประเทศไทย.” วารสารวิจัยสังคม 40(1): 141-175. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/socialresearchjournal/article/view/91066

สำนักงานทรัพยากรธรรมชาติและสิ่งแวดล้อมจังหวัดเชียงใหม่. 2565. สรุปผลดำเนินงานการแก้ไขปัญหาไฟป่าและฝุ่นละอองขนาดเล็ก (PM2.5) จังหวัดเชียงใหม่ประจำปี พ.ศ. 2565. (สำนักงานทรัพยากรธรรมชาติและสิ่งแวดล้อมจังหวัดเชียงใหม่).

Adams, William M. 2019. “Geographies of conservation II: Technology, surveillance and conservation by algorithm.” Progress in Human Geography 43 (2): 337-350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132517740220.

Agrawal, Arun. 2005. Environmentality: technologies of government and the making of subjects. Durham: Duke University Press.

Birkenholtz, Trevor and Gregory Simon. 2021. “Introduction to themed issue: Ignorance and uncertainty in environmental decision-making.”Geoforum 132: 154-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.12.003.

Cogos, Sarah, Lars Östlund, and Samuel Roturier. 2021. “Negotiating (with) Fire: Contemporary Fire Domestication in Swedish Sápmi.” Journal of Ethnobiology 41(4): 499-516. https://doi.org/10.2993/0278-0771-41.4.499.

Davies, Thom. 2018. “Toxic Space and Time: Slow Violence, Necropolitics, and Petrochemical Pollution.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 108(6): 1537-1553. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2018.1470924.

Dewulf, Art, and Robbert Biesbroek. 2018. “Nine lives of uncertainty in decision-making: strategies for dealing with uncertainty in environmental governance.” Policy and Society 37 (4): 441-458. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2018.1504484.

Diver, Sibyl. 2016. “Co-management as a Catalyst: Pathways to Post-colonial Forestry in the Klamath Basin, California.”Human Ecology 44(5): 533-546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-016-9851-8.

Fletcher, Michael-Shawn, Anthony Romano, Simon Connor, Michela Mariani, and Shira Yoshi Maezumi. 2021. “Catastrophic bushfires, indigenous fire knowledge and reframing science in Southeast Australia.” Fire 4(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/fire4030061.

GISTDA. 2562. “ชุดความรู้ "เตรียมความพร้อมรับมือ ไฟป่า หมอกควัน".” GISTDA. https://www.gistda.or.th/news_view.php?n_id=3083&lang=TH.

Goldstein, Jenny Elaine. 2019. “The Volumetric Political Forest: Territory, Satellite Fire Mapping, and Indonesia’s Burning Peatland.” Antipode 52(4): 1060-1082. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12576.

Havice, Elizabeth, Lisa Campbell, and Andre Boustany. 2022. “New Data Technologies and the Politics of Scale in Environmental Management: Tracking Atlantic Bluefin Tuna.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 112(8): 2174-2194. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2022.2054766.

Hayward, Daniel. 2022. “Maize production in North Thailand: Corporate gains for smallholder pains.” In Inequalities and environmental changes in the Mekong River Basin, edited by A. Drogoul, E. Espagne, L. H. T. Phuong and S. Lagrée, 169-197. France: AFD Editions.

Hongthong, Anuttara, Kampol Nanthapong, and Thongchai Kanabkaew. 2022. “Biomass burning emission inventory of multi-year PM10 and PM2.5 with high temporal and spatial resolution for Northern Thailand.” ScienceAsia 48: 302-309. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.2022.040.

Liboiron, Max, Manuel Tironi, and Nerea Calvillo. 2018. “Toxic politics: Acting in a permanently polluted world.” Social Studies of Science 48(3): 331-349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312718783087.

Lin, Guoqing, Robert E. Wolfe, Ping Zhang, John J. Dellomo, and Bin Tan. 2022. “Ten Years of VIIRS On-Orbit Geolocation Calibration and Performance.” Remote Sensing 14 (17): 4212. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/14/17/4212.

Long, Jonathan W., Frank K. Lake, and Ron W. Goode. 2021. “The importance of Indigenous cultural burning in forested regions of the Pacific West, USA.” Forest Ecology and Management 500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119597.

Kraisitnitikul, Pavidarin, Duangduean Thepnuan, Sarana Chansuebsri, Nuttipon Yabueng, Wan Wiriya, Supattarachai Saksakulkrai, Zongbo Shi, and Somporn Chantara. In Press. “Contrasting compositions of PM2.5 in Northern Thailand during La Niña (2017) and El Niño (2019) years.” Journal of Environmental Sciences. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2022.09.026.

Kroepsch, Adrianne C., and Katherine R. Clifford. 2022. “On environments of not knowing: How some environmental spaces and circulations are made inscrutable.” Geoforum 132: 171-181. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.05.009.

Kull, Christian A. 2004. Isle of Fire: The Political Ecology of Landscape Burning in Madagascar. London: University of Chicago Press.

Mahony, Martin. 2014. “The predictive state: Science, territory and the future of the Indian climate.” Social Studies of Science 44(1): 109-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312713501407.

Marks, Danny, and Michelle Ann Miller. 2022. “A transboundary political ecology of air pollution: Slow violence on Thailand's margins.” Environmental Policy and Governance. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1976

Massé, Francis. 2018. “Topographies of security and the multiple spatialities of (conservation) power: Verticality, surveillance, and space-time compression in the bush.” Political Geography 67: 56-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.10.001.

Mehta, Lyla, Shilpi Srivastava, Hans Nicolai Adam, Alankar, Shibaji Bose, Upasona Ghosh, and V. Vijay Kumar. 2019. “Climate change and uncertainty from ‘above’ and ‘below’: perspectives from India.” Regional Environmental Change 19(6): 1533-1547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-019-01479-7.

Miller, Andrew Miller, and Iain Davidson-Hunt. 2010. “Fire, agency and scale in the creation of aboriginal cultural landscapes.” Human Ecology 38(3): 401-414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-010-9325-3.

Mostafanezhad, Mary and Olivier Evrard. 2021. “Chronopolitics of crisis: A historical political ecology of seasonal air pollution in northern Thailand.” Geoforum 124: 400-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.05.011.

NASA. 2022. “FIRMS Frequently Asked Questions.” https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/faq/firms-faq.

NOAA. 2017. Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) Sensor Data Record (SDR) User’s Guide. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (U.S. Department of Commerce). https://ncc.nesdis.noaa.gov/documents/documentation/viirs-users-guide-tech-report-142a-v1.3.pdf.

NOAA. 2022. “Cold & Warm Episodes by Season.” El Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO). NOAA. https://origin.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/ensostuff/ONI_v5.php.

North Public News. 2563. “เดโช ไชยทัพ:จากนี้ไปจะเป็นการคิดแผนจากข้างล่างขึ้นสู่ข้างบน เป็นความท้าทายที่จะทำให้พื้นที่ 80% มีการบริหารจัดการที่ชัดเจน.” North Public News, 2563. https://www.northpublicnews.com/เดโช-ไชยทัพจากนี้ไปจะเป/.

Pardthaisong, Liwa, Phaothai Sin-ampol, Chanida Suwanprasit, and Arisara Charoenpanyanet. 2018. “Haze Pollution in Chiang Mai, Thailand: A Road to Resilience.” Procedia Engineering 212: 85-92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.012.

Peluso, Nancy Leluso and Peter Vandergeest. 2020. “Writing Political Forests.” Antipode 52(4): 1083-1103. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12636.

Samimian-Darash, Limor. 2013. “Toward an Anthropology of Uncertainty: Governing Future Potential Biothreats.” Current Anthropology 54(1): 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1086/669114

Samimian-Darash, Limor and Paul Rabinow. 2015. Modes of Uncertainty: Anthropoligical Cases. London: University of Chicago Press.

Scoones, Ian and Andy Stirling. 2020. The Politics of Uncertainty: Challenges of Transformation. London: Routledge.

Scott, James C. 1998. “Seeing like a state : how certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed.” New Haven: Yale University Press.

Schroeder, Wilfrid, Patricia Oliva, Louis Giglio, and Ivan A. Csiszar. 2014. “The New VIIRS 375m active fire detection data product: Algorithm description and initial assessment.” Remote Sensing of Environment 143: 85-96. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.12.008.

Vinyeta, Kirsten. 2022. “Under the guise of science: how the US Forest Service deployed settler colonial and racist logics to advance an unsubstantiated fire suppression agenda.” Environmental Sociology 8 (2): 134-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2021.1987608.

Zeiderman, Austin. 2012. “On Shaky Ground: The Making of Risk in Bogotá.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 44 (7): 1570-1588. https://doi.org/10.1068/a44283.

Additional Files

Published

2023-04-27

How to Cite

Vaddhanaphuti, Chaya. 2023. “Politics of Hotspot and Uncertainties in Space and Time of the ‘FireD’ System: A Case Study on Forest Fire and Haze Pollution in Chiang Mai 2022”. Social Sciences Academic Journal, Faculty of Social Sciences, Chiang Mai University 35 (1):188-235. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jss/article/view/259841.