Justifications for Local Government Amalgamation in International Context

Main Article Content

Pobsook Chamchong

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the justifications for local amalgamation in international context. To achieve the objective, documentary research approach has been conducted. The relevant literature has been analyzed by using thematic and narrative analysis. It primarily shows that economic reasons namely efficiency and economies of scale are typically used as justification for merger. It also reveals that amalgamation does not allow local governments to achieve the efficiency and economies of scale significantly. Essentially, the efficiency of local governments’ service provision and delivery does not require a larger local government unit. Moreover, the phenomenon of local government amalgamation is seen as managerial fashion and suitably explained by mimetic isomorphism theory. A country imitates other countries’ merger approach because of the belief that such amalgamation is beneficial. Furthermore, it demonstrates that the better approach to realising the improved efficiencies and economies of scale is to amalgamate individual services, especially a shared services strategy, instead of the local governments providing them. Finally, the costs of amalgamation, i.e. the restructuring costs, which involve both direct and indirect costs, must be given a high consideration when formulating local government amalgamation proposal.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Chamchong, P. (2019). Justifications for Local Government Amalgamation in International Context. Journal of Social Sciences Naresuan University, 13(2), 13_161–185. Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jssnu/article/view/208725
Section
Research Paper

References

เอกสารภาษาไทย
ปิยะพงษ์ บุษบงก์ และคณะ (2560) การสร้างความร่วมมือในการบริหารจัดการท้องถิ่น: สำรวจแนวปฏิบัติในภาคตะวันออกเฉียงเหนือ. รายงานฉบับสมบูรณ์ เสนอต่อ สำนักงานกองทุนสนับสนุนการวิจัย
ปรีชา อุยตระกูล และคณะ (2559) แนวทางการปรับเปลี่ยนโครงสร้างองค์กรปกครองส่วนท้องถิ่น : กรณีศึกษาการควบรวมองค์กรปกครองส่วนท้องถิ่นในอำเภอพิมาย จังหวัดนครราชสีมา และการยกฐานะองค์กรปกครองส่วนท้องถิ่นในอำเภอสูงเนิน จังหวัดนครราชสีมา. ศูนย์ข้อมูลท้องถิ่นเพื่อการพัฒนา มูลนิธิชุมชนโคราช. สืบค้นจาก http://www.koratcf.or.th/source/content-pdf/content-pdf-id-14.pdf.
The World Bank (2012). การเพิ่มประสิทธิภาพการให้บริการสาธารณะของไทย. รายงานการบริหารการเงินการคลังสาธารณะของประเทศไทย. สืบค้นเมื่อวันที่15 เมษายน 2560 จาก www.worldbank.org/th



Translated Thai References
Boossabong, P., Chopyot, S. and Chamchong, P. (2017). Collaborative Local Governance: Exploring Practices in the North-eastern Thailand. Final Report submitted to the Thailand Research Fund.
Auitrakul, P., Kungsirikul, N. and Ngamchoie, S. (2016). Approaches to Restructuring Local Governments: the Case of Municipal Amalgamation in Phimai, Nakhon Ratchasima Province and Up-scaling Local Governments in Soongnern District, Nakhon Ratchasima Province. Local Information Center for Development, Thailand.
The World Bank (2012). Enhancing Efficiency in Service Delivery in Thailand. Public Financial Management Report. Retrieved April 15, 2017 from www.worldbank.org/th

เอกสารภาษาต่างประเทศ
Allan, P. (2003). Why Smaller Councils Make Sense. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 62: 74-81.
Allers, A.M. and Geetsema, B.J. (2016). The Effects of Local Government Amalgamation on Public Spending and Service Levels: Evidence from 15 Years of Municipal Boundary Reform. Groningen: Faculty of Economics & Business, University of Groningen
Andrews, R. and Boyne, G. A. (2009). Size, Structure and Administrative Overheads: An Empirical Analysis of English Local Authorities. Urban Studies, 46(4): 739-759.
Andrews, R. (2013). Local Government Amalgamation and Financial Sustainability: the Case of England and Wales. Public Finance and Management, 13(2): 124-141.
Aulich, C., Sansom, G. and McKinlay, P. (2014). A Fresh Look at Municipal Consolidation in Australia. Local Government Studies, 40 (1): 1-20.
Benton, J.E. (2013). Local Government Collaboration: Considerations, Issues, and Prospects. State and Local Government Review, 45 (4): 220-223.
Blaire, R. and Janousek, C. L. (2013.) Collaborative Mechanism in Interlocal Cooperation: A Longitudinal Examination. State and Local Government Review, 45 (4): 268-282.
Chamchong, P. (2016). The Initiation and Sustainability of Collaboration between Small Local Governments: A Comparative Analysis of England and Thailand. PhD thesisม University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England. Retrieved from http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/6529/
Chisholm, M. (2004). Reorganizing Two-Tier Local Government for Regional Assemblies. Public Money & Management, 24 (2): 113-120.
Dafflon, B. (2012). Voluntary Amalgamation of Local Governments: the Swiss Debate in the European Context. International Center for Public Policy Working Paper 12-04. Retrieved from icepp.gsu.edu/files/2015/03/ispwp1204.pdf
Dahl, R. and Tufte, E. R. (1973). Size and Democracy. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
Denters, B. (2002). Size and Political Trust: Evidence from Denmark, the Netherlands, Norway, and the United Kingdom. Environment and Planning: Government and Policy, 20 (6): 793–812.
Department for Communities and Local Government (2010). Pickles Stops Unitary Councils in Exeter, Norwich and Suffolk. GOV.UK, 26th May. Retrieved 25 March, 2013 from https://www.gov.uk/government/news/pickles-stops-unitary-councils-in-exeter-norwich-and-Suffolk.
DeVries, M.S. and Sobis, I. (2013). Consolidation in Local Government: An International Comparison of Arguments and Practices. Paper for the 21stNISPAccc Annual Conference “Regionalisation and Inter-regional Cooperation”, 16-18 May, Belgrade, Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/file.PostFileLoader.html?id=54423 a67d2fd64c5668b45c8&assetKey=AS%3A273626350194704%401442249015192
DiMaggio, P. and Powell, W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48 (2): 148-160.
Dollery, B., Byrnes, J. and Allen, P. (2007). Optimal Structural Reform in Australia Local Government: An Empirical Analysis of Economies of Scale by Council Function in New South Wales. Urban Policy and Research, 25: 473-486.
Dollery, B., Byrnes, J. and Crase, L. (2008). Australian Local Government Amalgamation: A Conceptual Analysis Population Size and Scale Economies in Municipal Service Provision. Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, 14: 167-175.
Dollery, B., Akimov, A. and Byrnes, J. (2009). Shared Services in Australian Local Government: Rationale, Alternative Models and Empirical Evidence. The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 68: 208–219. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8500.2009.00635.x.
Dollery, B., Grant, B. and Kortt, M. A. (2012). Councils in Cooperation: Shared Services in Australian Local Government. Sydney: Federation Press.
Drew, J. and Dollery, B. (2014). Keeping It In-house: Households versus Population as Alternative Proxies for Local Government Output. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 73 (2): 235-246.
Drew, J., Kortt, M. and Dollery, B. (2014). Economies of Scale and Local Government Expenditure: Evidence from Australia. Administration & Society, 46 (6): 632-653.
Drew, J., Grant, B. and Campbell, N. (2016). Progressive and Reactionary Rhetoric in the Municipal Reform Debate in New South Wales Australia. Australian Journal of Political Science, DOI: 10.1080/10361146.2016.1154926.
Fahey, G., Drew, J. and Dollery, B. (2016). Merger Myths: A Functional Analysis of Scale Economies in New South Wales Local Government. Public Finance and Management, 16 (4): 362-382.
Faulk, D. and Grassmueck, G. (2012). City-county Consolidation and Local Government Expenditures. State and Local Government Review, 44 (3): 196-205.
Faulk, D., Schaal, P. and Taylor, C.D. (2013). How Does Local Government Amalgamation Affect Spending? Evidence from Louisville, Kentucky. Public Finance& Management, 13 (2): 80-98.
Ferguson, C. E. (1969). Neoclassical Theory of Production and Distribution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hanes, N. (2014). Amalgamation Impacts on Local Public Expenditures in Sweden. Local Government Studies, 41: 63-77.
Hansen, W. S. (2015). The Democratic Costs of Size: How Increasing Size Affects Citizen Satisfaction with Local Government. Political Studies, 63: 373-389.
Hoffman, G. and Talbot, M. (2013). Amalgamation: The Queensland experience to date - Learnings, Outcomes and Sustainability? Paper for 2013 Future of Local Government National Summit, Melbourne, 22-23 May, Retrieved from http://www.mav.asn.au/events/Pages/2013-folg-national-summit- 22052013.aspx
Holcombe, R. and Williams, D. (2009). Are there Economies of Scale in Municipal Government Expenditures? Public Finance and Management, 9 (3): 416-438.
Hulst, R. and Van Montfort, A. (2007). Inter-Municipal Cooperation: A Widespread Phenomenon. In Hulst, R. and Van Montfort, A. (Eds.) Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Europe (p, 1-21). Dordrecht: Springer.
Hulst, R. and van Montfort, A. (2011). Institutional Features of Inter-Municipal Cooperation: Cooperative Arrangements and Their National Contexts. Public Policy and Administration, 27 (2): 121-144.
Hulst, R., van Montfort, A., Haveri, A., Airaksinen, J. and Kelly, J. (2009). Institutional Shifts in Inter-Municipal Service Delivery: An Analysis of Developments in Eight Western European Countries. Public Organization Review, 9: 263-285.
John, P. (2011). Larger and Larger: The Endless Search for Efficiency in the UK. In H. Baldersheim and L. Rose (eds.) Territorial Choice in Europe (p.101-117). Basingstoke: Palgrave,
John, P. (2014). The Great Survivor: The Persistence and Resilience of English Local Government. Local Government Studies, 40 (5): 687-704.
Kelleher, C. and Lowery, D. (2004). Political Participation and Metropolitan Institutional Contexts. Urban Affairs Review, 39 (6): 720–757
Kortt, M.A., Dollery, B. and Drew, J. (2015). Municipal Mergers in New Zealand: An Empirical Analysis of the Proposed Amalgamation of Hawke’s Bay Councils. Local Government Studies, 42 (2): 1-20.
Labianca, M. (2014). Inter-Municipal Cooperation: From Cooperation through Rules to Cooperation through Networks: Empirical Evidence from Puglia. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 1 (1): 184-206.
Lassen, D. and Serritzlew, S. (2011). Jurisdiction Size and Local Democracy: Evidence on Internal Political Efficacy from Large-scale Municipal Reform. American Political Science Review, 105 (2): 238-258.
Local Government Association of Queensland (2005), Size, Shape and Sustainability of Queensland Local Government: a Discussion Paper. Retrieved from http://www.lgaq.asn.au/portal/dt?action=content&provider=JSPTabContainer
Local Government Association (2017). National Map of Shared Services. Retrieved 7 July 2017 from: http://www.local.gov.uk/shared-services-map [Accessed Local Government Centre, AUT University (2008). The Future Governance of Auckland Region. A Discussion Paper on Amalgamation: Lessons from International Experience. Retrieved from http://www.waitakere.govt.nz/havsay/pdf/royalcommission/amalgamation.pdf
Local Government NSW (2015). Amalgamation: To Merge or Not to Merge? A Background Paper Prepared for the LGNSW Learning Solutions workshop. Retrieved from https://www.lgnsw.org.au
McDavid, J. (2002).The Impacts of Amalgamation on Police Services in the Halifax Regional Municipality. Canadian Public Administration, 45 (4): 538-565.
McKinlay Douglas Ltd (2006). Local Government Structure and Efficiency, Local Government New Zealand, Wellington. Retrived from http://www.lgnz.co.nz/library/files/ store_015/LocalGovernmentStructureandEfficiencyReport.pdf
Miyazaki, T. (2014). Municipal Consolidation and Local Government Behavior: Evidence from Japanese Voting Data on Merger Referenda. Econ Gov, 15: 387 – 410.
Morgan, G. and Smircich, L. (1980). The Case Study Research. The Academy of Management Review, 5 (4): 491-500.
Reingewertz, Y. (2012). Do Municipal Amalgamation Work? Evidence from Municipalities in Israel. Journal of Urban Economics, 72 (2-3): 240-251.
Roesel, F. (2016). Do Mergers of Large Local Governments Reduce Expenditures? Evidence from Germany Using the Synthetic Control Method. Working Paper, No. 224. Retrived from http://hdl.handle.net/10419/149546
Sancton, A. (2000). Merger Mania. Quebec: McGill-Queens University Press.
Sullivan, H. and Skelcher, C. (2002). Working across Boundaries: Collaboration in Public Services. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Swianiewicz, P. (2002). Size of Local Government, Local Democracy and Efficiency in Delivery of Local services: International Context and Theoretical Framework. In Swianiewicz, P. (Ed.) Consolidation or Amalgamation? The Size of Local Governments in Central and Eastern Europe (p,1-29). Budapest: Open Society Institute.
Swianiewicz, P. (2010). Territorial Consolidation: Reform in Europe. Open Society Institute Budapest.
Tiley, I. (2013). Divided We Fall: An Insider’s Perspective on Local Government Amalgamations. XLibris Corporation.
The Local Government Boundary Commission for England (2009) Unitary Patterns of Local Government in Norfolk, Suffolk and Devon.The Local Government Boundary Commission for England. 9th February. Retrieved March 25, 2017 from http://www.lgbce.org.uk/news-and-media/latest-news/structural-reviews/unitary-patterns-of-local-government-in-norfolk,-suffolk-and-devon
Warm, D. (2011). Local Government Collaboration for a New Decade: Risk, Trust, and Effectiveness. State and Local Government Review, 43 (1): 60-65.
Warner, M.E. (2006). Inter-municipal Cooperation in the U.S.: A Regional Governance Solution? Urban Public Economics Review, 6: 221-239.