Developing a model to strengthening base of collaboration in local governance through participatory budgeting
Keywords:
Collaborative Governance, Local Governance, Participatory BudgetingAbstract
This research article aims to: 1) study the problems in order to analyze the development of a model to strengthen the network base of cooperation in local governance through participatory budgeting. 2) study the contributions of management based on cooperation and participatory budgeting that help strengthen local governance. This study employed qualitative research methods using participatory community analysis techniques (Participatory Rural Appraisal: PRA) with in-depth interviews and small group discussions. The key informants were local government organization leaders, community leaders in the study area, public sector/civil society network, private network, government network, and academic and educational institution network totaling 60 people and Five scholars. The results of the study revealed that the challenges in developing cooperation include: 1) unfavorable regulations and laws 2) a lack of a cooperative culture among the public 3) a lack of motivation and skills in fostering cooperation and 4) the absence of leadership in promoting collaboration. The recommended approaches to enhance cooperation are: 1) involving relevant networks in joint roles 2) establishing mechanisms, regulations, rules, and mutual agreements 3) building trust to ensure transparent management and 4) the role of leadership in collaboration. Therefore, recognizing the significance of strong cooperation as the foundation of local governance through participatory budgeting leads to increased collaboration.
References
Agranoff, R. and McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative Public Management: New Strategies for Local Government. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Ansell, C. and Gash, A. (2007). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press.
Baiochhi, G. (2001). Participation, Activism, and Politics: The Porto Alegre Experiment and
Deliberative Democracy Theory. In Politics and Society. Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 43-72.
Baez, N. and Hernandez, A. (2012). “Participatory Budgeting in the City: Challenging NYC’s Development Paradigm from the Grassroots.” Interface 4 (1): 316-326.
Bevir, M. (2010). Democratic Governance. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
Busabong, P., et al. (2017). Local Management Cooperation Project: Exploring Practices in the Northeast Region. Sponsored by the Thailand Research Foundation (TRF) [in Thai]
Chantavanich, S. (2013). Qualitative research methods. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press. [in Thai]
Cheema, G. S. (2005). From Public Administration to Governance: The Paradigm Shift in the Link between Government and Citizens. A paper presented at the 6th Global Forum on Reinventing Government towards Participatory and Transparent Governance. on 24-27 May 2005, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Chinnasri, W. and Amornsiriphong, S. (2018). Participatory Budgeting: The Knowledge Premises and the Application to Thai Local Governance. International Journal of Crime, Law and Social Issues, Vol. 5, No. 1
Diego de Melo Conti, et al., .(2019). Governance towards cities sustainability transition. Thematic Section: Understanding Smart and Sustainable Cities: DOI: 10.1590/2175- 3369.011.e20190046
Forkovocova, A. (2013). Understanding Participatory Budgeting: Lesson learn from Bratislava. Central European university.
Fung, A. and Wright, E. O. (2002). Deepening Democracy: Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. Politics and Society. 29 (1): 5-41.
Gilman, H. R., (2012). Transformative Deliberations: Participatory Budgeting in the United States. Harvard University.
Gutmann, A. and Thompson, D. (1998). Democracy and Disagreement. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Hamilton, M. E. (2014). Is Participatory Democracy the Answer?: Participatory Budgeting and Development in Brazilian Municipalities. University of California, San Diego.
Hartz-Karp, J. (2012). Laying the Groundwork for Participatory Budgeting – Developing a Deliberative Community and Collaborative Governance: Greater Geraldton, Western Australia. Journal of Public Deliberation. Vol. 8 [2012], Iss. 2, Art. 6
Kachmat, S. (2007). Providing public services based on the concept of cooperation between local administrative organizations. Local Development Journal. 2 (1) (June - September 2007): p. 59. [in Thai]
Kemmis, S. & McTaggart. (2005). Participatory Action Research: Communicative Action and
Public Sphere. In DENZIN, Norman K. and Lincoln, Yvona S., (eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. 3rd ed. London: SAGE Publications.
Kruathep, W. (2007). Network: Innovation in the Work of Local Government Organizations. Analysis of Local Administrative Organization Level Management Enhance operational capabilities and public responsibility. Bangkok: Research Fund Office. [in Thai]
Loffler, E. (2005). “Governance and Government: Networking with External Stakeholders”, in Public Management and Governance, Tony Bovaird and Elke Loffler (eds.) London: Taylor & Francis Group.
Luangprapat, W. (2020). Collaborative Governance: A Decentralized Society The division in the national administrative system and the search for new models to advance the country's mission. Published by King Prajadhipok's Institute. [in Thai]
Mektrairat, N. et al. (2008). Handbook for cooperation between local administrative organizations. Bangkok: Department of Local Administration. [in Thai]
Pothisita, C. (2019). The science and art of qualitative research. (8th printing). Bangkok: Amarin Printing and Publishing. [in Thai]
Setthabutra, N. et al. (2002). Capacity building in local administrative organizations. Bangkok: Provincial Administration Department.
Shah, A. (2007). “Overview.” In Participatory Budgeting. Anwar Shah. (Ed.) The World Bank, Washington, DC., 1-18.
Wampler, B. (2007). Participatory Budgeting in Brazil: Contestation Cooperation, and Accountability. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Wampler, B. Avritzer, L. (2006). The Spread of Participatory Budgeting in Brazil: From Radical Democracy to Participatory Good Governance. Journal of Latin American Urban Studies. Vol 7, Fall/Winter.
UN-HABITAT. (2004). Participatory Budgeting: Conceptual Framework and Analysis of its Contribution to Urban Governance and the Millenium Development Goals. Concept Working Paper Number 140, Nairobi: UN-HABITAT.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Modern Management Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.