SATISFACTION OF NURSING STUDENTS IN BACHELOR OF NURSING SCIENCE PROGRAM TOWARD ONLINE LEARNING AMONG CRISIS SITUATIONAL COVID-19
Keywords:
Nursing Student, Satisfaction of Nursing Student, Online Learning, Covid-19Abstract
This research aims to investigate the level of satisfaction of nursing students and factors associated with satisfaction of nursing students toward online learning among crisis situational COVID-19. The quantitative and qualitative data were reviewed by three experts. A total of 284 nursing students were obtained to collect quantitative data with their satisfaction and semi-structural questionnaires divided into 2 focus group discussions to collect qualitative data at Nursing Faculty between January 15th - February 20th, 2021. An Ordered logistic regression and content analysis were used to identify significant factors contributing to nursing student satisfaction. Results: After controlling for individual socio-demographic factors, the result reveals that 2 factors have positive effects on nursing student satisfaction were the quality of lecturers with their various online teaching approaches, and skills and gained experience. Conclusion: The findings reflect challenges in the teaching and management context. This indicates the issue of supporting instructors in improving their online teaching capabilities. To enhance students’ appropriate learning skills and experience to achieve the highest level of satisfaction, according to the concept of quality assurance.
Downloads
References
กรมควบคุมโรค. (2563). มาตรการและแนวทางดำเนินการเพื่อการเฝ้าระวัง ป้องกันและควบคุมโรคติดเชื้อไวรัสโคโรน่า 2019. สืบค้นจาก https://ddc.moph.go.th/viralpneumonia/file/im_commands/im_commands06.pdf
ข่าวและกิจกรรม มศว. (2563). แนวทางปฏิบัติสำหรับการจัดการเรียนการสอนเพื่อการป้องกันการแพร่ระบาดของเชื้อ COVID-19. สืบค้นจาก https://news.swu.ac.th/doc/5021130340.pdf
O'neil, C. (2015). Teaching in online learning environments. In M. H. Oermann (Ed.), Teaching in nursing and role of the educator: The complete guide to best practice in teaching, evaluation, and curriculum development. New York: Springer publishing company.
Armstrong, S. (2013). What are the advantages and disadvantages of online learning?. Retrieved from https://elearningindustry.com/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-online-learning
Knippa, G. (2016). Advantages and disadvantages of online education. Retrieved from https://www.legalstudies.com/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-online-education/
Tobase, L., Peres, H. H. C., Gianotto-Oliveira, R., Smith, N., Polastri, T. F., and Timerman, S. (2017). The effects of an online basic life support course on undergraduate nursing students’ learning. International Journal of Medical Education, 8, 309-313.
Lahti, M., Hätönen, H., and Välimäki, M. (2014). Impact of e-learning on nurses' and student nurses knowledge, skills, and satisfaction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud, 51(1), 136-149.
Yukselturk, E., and Yildirim, Z. (2008). Investigation of interaction, online support, course structure and flexibility as the contributing factors to students’ satisfaction in an online certificate program. Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 51-65.
Gazza, E. A., and Matthias, A. (2016). Using student satisfaction data to evaluate a new online accelerated nursing education program. Eval Program Plann, 58, 171-175.
Yangoz, T. S., Okten, C., and Ozer, Z. (2017). The use of e-learning program in nursing education. In New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(2), 230-236.
Hua, W. J., Sen, L., and Wuttiphan, N. (2015). The effectiveness of lecture. Journal of Educational Khon Kaen University (EDKKUJ), 38(3), 1-9.
Mahmood, A., Mahmood, S. T., and Malik, A. B. (2012). A comparative study of student satisfaction level in distance learning and live classroom at higher education level. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education (TOJDE), 13(1), 128-136.
Ke, F., and Kwak, D. (2013). Constructs of student-centered online learning on learning satisfaction of a diverse online student body: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48(1), 97-122.
Dziuban, C., Moskal, P., Kramer, L., and Thompson, J. (2013). Student satisfaction with online learning in the presence of ambivalence: Looking for the will-o’-the-wisp. Internet and Higher Education, 17, 1-8.
Sowan, A. K., and Jenkins, L. S. (2013). Designing, delivering and evaluating a distance learning nursing course responsive to students needs. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 82(6), 553-564.
Elliott, K., and Shin, D. (2002). Student satisfaction: an alternative approach to assessing this Important Concept. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 97-109.
Mukhtar, U., Anwar, S., Ahmed, U., and Baloch, M. A. (2015). Factors effecting the service quality of public and private sector universities comparatively: An empirical investigation. Arts, Science & Commerce, 132-142.
Fieger, P. (2012). Measuring student satisfaction from the student outcomes survey. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED532394.pdf
Wilkins, S., and Balakrishnan, M. S. (2013). Assessing student satisfaction in transnational higher education. International Journal of Educational Management, 146-153.
Martirosyan, N. (2015). An examination of factors contributing to student satisfaction in Armenian higher education. International Journal of Educational Management, 29(2), 177-191.
Rubin, B., Fernandes, R., and Avgerinou, M. D. (2013). The effects of technology on the community of inquiry and satisfaction with online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 17, 48-57.
Keengwe, J., Diteeyont, W., and Lawson-Body, A. (2012). Student and instructor satisfaction with elearning tools in online learning environments. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE), 8(1), 76-86.
Winberg, T. M., and Hedman, L. (2008). Student attitudes toward learning, level of preknowledge and instruction type in a computer-simulation: Effects on flow experiences and perceived learning outcomes. Instructional Science, 36(4), 269-287.
Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A. E., Belland, B. R., and Schroder, K. E. E. (2013). A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(1), 1-25.
Wilkins, S., and Balakrishnan, M. S. (2013). Assessing student satisfaction in transnational higher education. International Journal of Educational Management, 7(2), 146-153.
ดารุณี รุจกรกานต์. (2557). สถานการณ์การจัดการศึกษาพยาบาลในประเทศไทย. ใน การจัดการศึกษาพยาบาล สำหรับศตวรรษที่ 21 ณ โรงแรมอมารี ดอนเมือง แอร์พอร์ต กรุงเทพฯ.
Kang, J., and Seomun, G. (2018). Evaluating Web-based nursing education’s effects: A systematic review and meta-analysis. West. J. Nurs. Res, 40(11), 1677-1697.
Cheng, L., Jing, H., Chenxi, Y., Bin, C., and Zhiling, S. (2019). The effects of blended learning on knowledge, skills, and satisfaction in nursing students: A meta-analysis. Nurse Education Today, 82, 51-57.
Nieuwoudt, J. (2018). Exploring online interaction and online learner participation in an online science subject through the lens of the interaction equivalence theorem. Student Success, 9(4), 53-62.
Elshami, W., Taha, M. H., Abuzaid, M., Saravanan, C., Al Kawas, S., and Abdalla, M. E. (2021). Satisfaction with online learning in the new normal: Perspective of students and faculty at medical and health sciences colleges. Medical Education Online, 26(1), Article 1920090.
Arnab, R. (2017). Chapter 1 - Preliminaries and Basics of Probability Sampling. In A. C. A., Garcia (Ed.), Survey sampling theory and applications (pp. 1-21). London: Academic press.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
Reyles, D. Z. (2011). The human development index (HDI). New York: United Nations Development Programme.
Diekelman, N. L. (1992). Learning-as-testing: A Heideggerian hermeneutic analysis of the lived-experiences of student and teachers in nursing. Advances in Nursing Science, 14(3), 72-78.
วัชรี ด่านกุล. (2564). ผลการวิเคราะห์ข้อมูล. นครนายก: คณะพยาบาลศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยศรีนครินทรวิโรฒ.
Devore, J. L., and Peck, R. (1993). Statistic: The exploration and analysis of data. New York: Duxbury Press.
ราชกิจจานุเบกษา. (2563). มาตรฐานความรู้และประสบการณ์วิชาชีพครูตามข้อบังคับคุรุสภา ว่าด้วยมาตรฐานวิชาชีพ (ฉบับที่ 4) พ.ศ. 2562. กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักเลขาธิการรัฐมนตรี.
Weerasinghe, I. S., Lalitha, R., and Fernando, S. (2017). Students’ satisfaction in higher education literature review. American Journal of Educational Research, 5(5), 533-539.
Harsasi, M., and Sutawijaya, A. (2018). Determinants of student satisfaction in online tutorial: A study of a distance education institution. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 18(1), Article 7.
ศศิธร บัวทอง. (2017). การวัดและประเมินทักษะการเรียนรู้ในศตวรรตที่ 21. Veridian E-Journal Silpakorn University (Hamanities, Social Science and Art), 10(2), 1856-1867.
Asean University Network. (2014). Guidelines for AUN Quality Assessment and Assessors. Retrieved from http://qd.swu.ac.th/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=tiZGhE9_GgM%3d&tabid=16281&portalid=2077&mid=36017&language=en-US
Rogo, E. J., and Portillo. K. M. (2014). Critical issues in dental hygiene. The Journal of Dental Hygiene, 88, 213-228.
Doolan, K. (2020). Student life during the covid-19 pandemic: Europe-wide insights. Retrieved from http://www.ehea.info/Upload/BFUG_HR_UA_71_8_1_Survey_results.pdf
Ingard, A., Karnjanapoomi, N., and Sheoychitra, P. (2020). Undergraduate students’ anxiety during the coronavirus disease epidemic in 2019. MUT Journal of Business Administration, 17(2), 94-113.
เมลดา กลิ่นมาลี. (2554). นักศึกษากับปัญหาความเครียด. วารสารการอาชีวะและเทคนิคศึกษา, 1(1), 64-70.
Suwanaphant, K., Seedaket, S., Vonok, L., Assana, S., Wawngam, W., Kingsawad, K., and On-Kail, P. (2020). Factors associated with stress due to corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic among students of the Faculty of Public Health and Allied Health Sciences, Praboromarajchanok Institute. Journal of Health Science Research, 14(2), 138-147.
อวาทิพย์ แว. (2563). COVID-19 กับการเรียนรู้สู่การปรับเปลี่ยนพฤติกรรมสุขภาพในวันนี้. วารสารสมาคมวิชาชีพสุขศึกษา, 35(1), 25-29.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Srinakharinwirot Research and Development (Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Srinakharinwirot Research and Development Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences is licensed Under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0) License, Unless Otherwise Stated. Please Read Journal Policies Page for More Information on Open Access, Copyright and Permissions.
