Examining The Direct and Indirect Effects of Social Media Advertising Benefits on Impulse Buying Behavior Through Privacy Concern Among Generation Z Consumers

Main Article Content

Wut Sookcharoen
Sasikarn Charanakaran
Duangporn Kongpikul
Phattaraporn Timdang

Abstract

This quantitative research investigates the influence of social media advertising benefits on impulse buying behavior among Generation Z consumers, with privacy concern incorporated as a mediating construct. Data were obtained through a structured self-administered questionnaire distributed via online snowball sampling, yielding 461 valid responses. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was employed to examine the hypothesized relationships, and the measurement model demonstrated an excellent fit (CMIN/DF = 1.243, CFI = 0.999, RMSEA = 0.023). The results reveal that advertising benefits exert a significant positive direct effect on impulse buying (β = 0.228, p < 0.001) and a significant positive effect on privacy concern (β = 0.111, p = 0.020). Conversely, privacy concern negatively influences impulse buying (β = −0.155, p < 0.001). The indirect effect mediated by privacy concern is slightly negative, indicating partial mediation. Overall, the findings highlight that the affective appeal of social media advertising enhances spontaneous purchasing tendencies, whereas heightened privacy awareness introduces cognitive restraint, thereby mitigating impulsive purchase behaviors.

Article Details

Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Wut Sookcharoen

Chandrakasem Rajabhat University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Sasikarn Charanakaran

Chandrakasem Rajabhat University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Duangporn Kongpikul

Chandrakasem Rajabhat University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Phattaraporn Timdang, -

Suan Dusit University, Bangkok, Thailand.

References

Aiolfi, S., Bellini, S., & Pellegrini, D. (2021). Data-driven digital advertising: benefits and risks of online behavioral advertising. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 49(7), 1089-1110. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-10-2020-0410

Bhatia, V. (2020). Drivers and barriers of permission-based marketing. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 14(1), 51-70. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-07-2018-0088

Blunch, N. J. (2013). Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling Using IBM SPSS Statistics and AMOS. London: Sage.

Campos, L. (2021). Why marketing personalization is so important and how to use it.Retrieved from Piesync website. https://www.piesync.com/blog/marketing-personalization/

Choi, W. J., & Jerath, K. (2022). Privacy and consumer empowerment in online advertising. Foundations and Trends in Marketing, 15(3), 153-212. https://doi.org/10.1561/1700000053

Feng, Z. (2023). Modeling the significance of advertising values on online impulse buying behavior along with the indirect connection between the urge to buy impulsively and moderation of anxiety. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, 374. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02231-7

Guo T, Cai C, Xu Y, Huang M, Ni Y. (2024). Self-Esteem and College Students’ Online Impulse Buying: The Independent and Interactive Moderating Role of Interdependent Self-Construal and Interpersonal Relationships. Psychology Research and Behavior Management. 17, 4447-4461.https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S494636

Kelley, L. D. & Sheehan, K. B. (2022). Advertising Management in a Digital Environment.

New York: Routledge.

Kotler, P., Kartajaya, H., & Setiawan, I. (2021). Marketing 5.0: Technology for humanity.

New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Kyguoliene, A., Zikiene, K., & Grigaliunaite, V. (2017). The influence of perceived benefits on the satisfaction with the loyalty program. Engineering Economics, 28(1), 101-109. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.28.1.14635

Lim, M. (2024). Social Media and Politics in Southeast Asia. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Lina, L. (2021). Privacy Concerns in Personalized Advertising Effectiveness on Social Media. Sriwijaya International Journal of Dynamic Economics and Business, 1(2), 147.https://doi.org/10.29259/sijdeb.v1i2.147-156

Marco, P. D. (2025). The Psychology of Shopping. Netherlands: Publishdrive.

Obadă, D. R. (2024). What drives online impulse buying among Zoomers on TikTok. Frontiers in Communication, 9, 1470327. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1470327

Pacheco, D. C., Damiao, A. I., Moniz, A. I., Caldeira, S. N., & Siva O. D. L. (2024). Online Impulse Buying Tendency-Impact of Psychological, Social, and Technology Factors.

In Antonio, (Ed), Advances in Tourism, Technology and System. (pp. 375-388). Portugal: Springer.

Pew Research Center. (2023). Defining generations: Where Millennials end and Generation Z begins. Retrieved from Pew Research Center Website: https://www.pewresearch.org

Pilakaew, T., Thanitbenjasith, P. ., & Kamkankaew, P. (2024). The Impact of Consumer Perceptions of Privacy and Security Risks on Re-purchasing Intention for Online Shopping in Chiang Mai Province, Thailand. International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews, 4(6), 531-542. https://doi.org/10.60027/ijsasr.2024.5065

Rand, S. (2025). Understanding US Gen Z media consumption trends: Insights for brands. Retrieved from Attest Website: https://www.askattest.com/blog/research/gen-z-media-consumption.

Singh, P., Sharma, B. K., Arora, L., & Bhatt, V. (2023). Measuring social media impact on Impulse Buying Behavior. Cogent Business & Management, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2262371

Strycharz, J., Van Noort, G., Smit, E., & Helberger, N. (2019). Protective behavior against personalized ads: Motivation to turn personalization off. Cyberpsychology, 13(2), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2019-2-1

Timmermann, R. (2025). The Rise of Digital Privacy: How Social Media Marketing Will Adapt. Retrieved from Timmermann Group Website: https://www.wearetg.com/blog/digital-privacy-social- media-marketing/

Tuten, T. L. (2021). Social media marketing (4th ed.). California: Sage.

Xuan, C. (2023). The Effects of Social Media Advertising in China. London: Routledge.