A Guideline for Learning Resources Management in Instructional Management at Saraphi District Learning Encouragement Center, Chiangmai Province

Abstract

The research aimed to 1) study the management of learning resources in teaching and learning management and 2) study the management approach of learning resources in teaching and learning management of Saraphi District Learning Promotion Center, Chiang Mai Province. The qualitative research was conducted by interviewing 8 experts, including directors, teachers and educational personnel, and focusing on 7 people, including experts in educational administration, learning resource management, teaching and learning management, and university lecturers. The tools were interview forms and focus groups, and content analysis.

 The research results found that:

 1) The management of learning resources in teaching and learning management of Saraphi District Learning Promotion Center, Chiang Mai Province, found that the strengths were 1) teamwork, 2) potential communities, 3) use of technology in operations, 4) support for the work of the learning promotion center, 5) diverse wisdom and learning resources, and 6) channels for learning and access to technology. The weaknesses and limitations were 1) unclear vision, 2) learning resources at a rate slower than the specified standard, 3) personnel understanding of how to use learning resources effectively, 4) unfavorable location, 5) materials and equipment not available, and 6) learners lacking learning opportunities. And 7) There is a lot of workload.

 2) The management guidelines for learning resources in teaching management of Saraphi District Learning Promotion Center, Chiang Mai Province, found that the Learning Promotion Center planned policies according to the needs of students, analyzed the potential of learning resources, organized various learning activities, prepared resources including people, media, learning resources, technology, linked with cooperation from local agencies, and integrated non-formal education both physically and in groups of people in a 360-degree manner, analyzed the impacts in terms of quality and quantity, prepared reports and used the results to improve and develop for maximum efficiency.