Investigator Triangulation: A Strategy for Enhancing Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14456/nrru-rdi.2024.30Keywords:
Qualitative Research, Trustworthiness of Qualitative Research, Triangulation, Investigator TriangulationAbstract
Introduction: The use of various strategies in qualitative research is essential for enhancing research trustworthiness. One widely accepted and commonly used strategy is triangulation, which involves using multiple data sources, methods, or perspectives to verify the consistency of research findings and reduce bias in data interpretation. Investigator triangulation is a crucial approach that emphasizes the use of multiple researchers' viewpoints and analyses to ensure the credibility and reliability of the interpretation and presentation of research results.
Main Content: The trustworthiness of qualitative research is established using four criteria: credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability. Of these, triangulation is one of the critical components in verifying and validating the research results. Such way, investigator triangulation has two basic dimensions: the conjugation of the triangulation process and researcher population diversity. The triangulation process has three phases: (1) preparation during which researchers are recruited, instruments are developed, data is collected and researchers are trained; (2) During this phase data collection, discussions, coding, code comparison, and result summarization are conducted; and (3) reporting which presents the oral and written findings of the research. The diversity of the researchers is analyzed in terms of specialization, pedigree and neutrality.
Conclusion: Investigator triangulation is a useful factor for increasing the trustworthiness and validity of qualitative research. This is one of the principles which researchers can implement in enhancing the consistency and the quality of their research work with regard to the topic. To this effect, investigator triangulation is beneficial as it enriches the understanding of the data by bringing in researchers with different and divergent views on the matter.
Knowledge and Utilization: Key approaches to increasing the trustworthiness of qualitative research through investigator triangulation include (1) using diverse data sources, (2) employing various data collection methods, (3) involving multiple investigators, (4) applying different theoretical frameworks, and (5) performing repeated analysis checks. These strategies allow all researchers in a project to contribute to data analysis and interpretation, ensuring objectivity, reducing bias, and improving the overall credibility and depth of research findings.
References
Ahmed, S. K. (2024). The pillars of trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 2, 100051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100051
Bhandari, P. (2023). Triangulation in Research: Guide, Types, Examples. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/triangulation/
Delve, Ho, L., & Limpaecher, A. (2023). What Is Investigator triangulation in Qualitative Analysis?. https://delvetool.com/blog/researcher-triangulation/
Donkoh, S., & Mensah, J. (2023). Application of triangulation in qualitative research. Journal of Applied Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 10(1), 6-9.
Flick, U. (2018). Triangulation. In Denzin, N. K., and Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (5th ed.), (pp. 777-804). Sages.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (n.d.). Effective evaluation. San Francisco. Jossey-Bass, in press.
Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth Generation Evaluation. Sage.
Hales, D., Peersman, G., & Kiwango, E. (2010). An introduction to triangulation. UNAIDS.
Heidegger, M. (1927). Being and time. Harper & Row.
Husserl, E. (1913). Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology. Collier.
Joungtrakul, J. (2010). Qualitative research: A tool for knowledge creation for national development. Business Law Center International.
Lemon, L. L., & Hayes, J. (2020). Enhancing Trustworthiness of Qualitative Findings: Using Leximancer for Qualitative Data Analysis Triangulation. The Qualitative Report, 25(3), 604-614.
Lim, W. M. (2024). What Is Qualitative Research? An Overview and Guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal, 1–31. DOI: 10.1177/14413582241264619
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage.
Meydan, C. H., & Akkaş, H. (2024). The Role of Triangulation in Qualitative Research: Converging Perspectives. In Principles of Conducting Qualitative Research in Multicultural Settings (pp. 98-129). IGI Global. DOI: 10.4018/979-8-3693-3306-8.ch006
Morse, J. (2018). Reframing rigor in qualitative inquiry. In Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (5th ed.) (pp. 1372-1409). Sage.
Mosbah, A. (2024). Ensuring Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Social Sciences Research. In Principles of Conducting Qualitative Research in Multicultural Settings (pp. 130-145). IGI Global. DOI: 10.4018/979-8-3693-3306-8.ch007
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage.
Nizamidou, C. (2023). Provocative products, the boomerang effect, the shooting star crisis and the panacea of workforce diversity. EuroMed Journal of Business, 18(2), 248-269. doi: 10.1108/emjb-05-2021-0067
Papavasileiou, E. F., & Dimou, I. (2024). Evidence of construct validity for work values using triangulation analysis. EuroMed Journal of Business. https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-10-2023-0287
Patton, M., Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd ed.). Sage.
Smith, J. A., Jarman, M., & Osborn, M. (1999). Doing interpretative phenomenological analysis. In Murray, M., & Chamberlain, K. (eds.), Qualitative Health Psychology: Theories and Methods (pp.218-240). Sage.
Tanoamchard, W., Unphim, U., & Joungtrakul, J. (2020). Presentation of Qualitative Research Findings. NRRU Community Research, 14(4), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.14456/nrru-rdi.2020.61
Tomaszewski, L. E., Zarestky, J., & Gonzalez, E. (2020). Planning Qualitative Research: Design and Decision Making for New Researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920967174
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Research and Development Institute, Nakhon Ratchasima Rajabhat University

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

