Forms and Positions of Backchannels by Chinese Learners of Thai: An Interlanguage Pragmatic Study
Main Article Content
Abstract
The use of backchannels is a conversational behavior that has garnered scholarly attention. Individuals from different cultural and societal backgrounds tend to use backchannels in different ways. The research aims to investigate the forms and positions of backchannels used by Chinese learners of Thai. Data were collected from audio recordings of conversations involving 12 pairs of Chinese learners of Thai, 6 pairs of native Thai speakers, and 6 pairs of native Chinese speakers. The findings indicate that Chinese learners of Thai utilized a less varied range of backchannel forms compared to native Thai speakers, and encountered challenges with the use of interjections and assessments. These difficulties may arise from first language transfer or an incorrect understanding of how interjections function in Thai. Regarding position, the three groups use backchannels in similar positions; however, differences in frequency were observed. Specifically, Chinese learners of Thai and native Chinese speakers used backchannels more frequently at the end of a speaker’s turn than native Thai speakers, reflecting a politeness perspective shaped by Confucian ideology. In terms of the relationship between the form and position of backchannels, Chinese learners of Thai, native Thai speakers, and native Chinese speakers all tend to use short utterances most frequently within the speaker’s turn. While native Thai and Chinese speakers predominantly use short utterances at the end of a speaker’s turn, Chinese learners of Thai show a preference for affirmative forms in the same position. This divergence may be attributed to several factors, including the influence of translating the Chinese word “对” (duì) and the communicative strategies commonly adopted by second language learners.
Article Details
References
นริศรา หาสนาม. (2558). ถ้อยคำแสดงการเป็นผู้ฟังของผู้ร่วมสนทนาที่มีสถานภาพเท่ากันในบทสนทนาภาษาไทย (วิทยานิพนธ์มหาบัณฑิต สาขาภาษาไทย). จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย, กรุงเทพฯ.
นริศรา หาสนาม และณัฐพร พานโพธิ์ทอง. (2565). ถ้อยคำแสดงการเป็นผู้ฟังในภาษาไทยกับปัจจัยสถานภาพ: กรณีศึกษาการสนทนาระหว่างครูกับนักเรียนจากฐานข้อมูล Mister O Corpus. มนุษยศาสตร์วิชาการ, 29(1), 189-217.
นริศา ไพเจริญ. (2559). การวิเคราะห์บทสนทนาในแบบเรียนภาษาไทยสำหรับผู้เรียนต่างชาติ (วิทยานิพนธ์ดุษฎีบัณฑิต สาขาภาษาศาสตร์). มหาวิทยาลัยธรรมศาสตร์, กรุงเทพฯ.
นววรรณ พันธุเมธา. (2554). ไวยากรณ์ไทย. กรุงเทพฯ: โครงการเผยแพร่ผลงานวิชาการ คณะอักษรศาสตร์ จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.
รดารัตน์ ศรีพันธ์วรสกุล. (2560). การใช้อนุภาคลงท้ายแสดงสถานภาพและแสดงมาลาของผู้เรียนภาษาไทยชาวจีน: การศึกษาตามแนววัจนปฏิบัติศาสตร์อันตรภาษา (วิทยานิพนธ์มหาบัณฑิต สาขาภาษาไทย). จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย, กรุงเทพฯ.
ราชบัณฑิตยสถาน. (2556). พจนานุกรม ฉบับราชบัณฑิตยสถาน พ.ศ. 2554. กรุงเทพฯ: ราชบัณฑิตยสถานภาษาต่างประเทศ
Allwood, J., Nivre, J., & Ahlsén, E. (1992). On the semantics and pragmatics of linguistic feedback. Journal of Semantics, 9(1), 1-26.
Bavelas, J. B., Coates, L., & Johnson, T. (2000). Listeners as co-narrators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 941-952.
Bavelas, J. B., Coates, L. & Johnson, T. (2002). Listener responses as a collaborative process: The role of gaze. Journal of Communication, 52(3), 566-580.
Clancy, P. M., Thompson, S. A., Suzuki, R., & Tao, H. (1996). The conversational use of reactive tokens in English, Japanese, and Mandarin. Journal of Pragmatics, 26, 355-387.
Deng, X. (2008). The use of listener responses in Mandarin Chinese and Australian English conversations. Pragmatics: Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association, 18(2), 303-328.
Deng, X. (2009). Listener response. In The Pragmatics of Interaction (pp. 104-124). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Dittmann, A. T., & Llewellyn, L. G. (1967). The phonemic clause as a unit of speech decoding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6(3), 341-348.
Dittmann, A. T., & Llewellyn, L. G. (1968). Relationship between vocalizations and head nods as listener responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(1), 79-84.
Duncan, S. (1972). Some signals and rules for taking speaking turns in conversations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23(2), 283-292.
Duncan, S. (1973). Toward a grammar for dyadic conversation. Semiotica, 9(1), 29-46.
Duncan, S., & Fiske, D. W. (1977). Face-to-face interaction: Research, methods, and theory. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Duncan, S., & Fiske, D. W. (1985). Interaction structure and strategy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fries, C. G. (1952). The structure of English: An introduction to the construction of English sentences. London: Longmans.
Gao, G. (1998). “Don’t Take My Word for It”: Understanding Chinese Speaking Practices. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22(2), 163-186.
Gao, W., & Wang, M. (2024). Listenership always matters: Active listening ability in L2 business English paired speaking tasks. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 63(4), 2777-2806.
Gardner, R. (2001). When listeners talk: Response tokens and listener stance. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Goodwin, C. (1986). Between and within: Alternative sequential treatments of continuers and assessments. Human Studies, 9(2/3), 205-217.
Gu, Y. (1990). Politeness Phenomena in Modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(2), 237-257.
Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Günthner, S. (1993). German-Chinese interactions: Differences in contextualization conventions and resulting miscommunication.Pragmatics:Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association, 3(3), 283-304.
Huang, Q. G. (2008). 英语学习者交际中Back-channeling策略使用的对比研究. 安徽理工大学学报(社会科学版), (03), 49-57.
Institute of Linguistics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (Ed.). (2016). Modern Chinese Dictionary (7th ed.) 现代汉语词典(第7版). Beijing: The Commercial Press.
Kasper, G. (1992). Pragmatic transfer. University of Hawai’i Working Papers in ESL, 11(1), 1-34.
Kasper, G., & Blum-Kulka, S. (1993). Interlanguage pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kraft, B., & Geluykens, R. (2007). Defining cross-cultural and interlanguage pragmatics. In Cross-cultural pragmatics and interlanguage English (pp. 3-20). Munich: Lincom Europa.
Leavitt, H. J., & Mueller, R. A. H. (1951). Some effects of feedback on communication. Human Relations, 4(4), 401–410.
Ross, S. (2018). Listener response as a facet of interactional competence. Language Testing, 35(3), 357–375.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696-735.
Schegloff, E. A. (1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. In Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk (pp.71–93). Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 10(1-4), 209-241.
Tao, H., & Thompson, S. A. (1991). English backchannels in Mandarin conversations: A case study of superstratum pragmatic ‘interference’. Journal of Pragmatics, 16(3), 209-233.
Tseng, S. (2001, February 1-3). Highlighting utterances in Chinese spoken discourse [Paper presentation]. Language, Information and Computation: Proceedings of The 15th Pacific Asia Conference, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Wan, J. Y. N. (2018). Functions of frequently used back channels in a corpus of intercultural conversations between Hong Kong Chinese (HKC) and native English speakers (NES). Journal of Intercultural Communication, 18(1), 1-14.
Wang, X. Q. (2015). 汉语自然会话中的支持性反馈研究 , Doctoral dissertation, Minzu University of China
Wannaruk, A. (1997). Back-channel behavior in Thai and American casual telephone conversations (Doctoral dissertation), University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Illinois.
Ward, N., & Tsukahara, W. (2000). Prosodic features which cue back-channel responses in English and Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(8), 1177-1207.
White, S. (1989). Backchannels across cultures: A study of Americans and Japanese. Language in Society, 18(1), 59-76.
Wu, P. (2001). 汉语会话中的反馈信号. 当代语言学 (02), 119-126, 157.
Yngve, V. H. (1970, April 16-18). On getting a word in edgewise [Paper presentation]. Papers from the Sixth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago.
Zimmerman, D., & West, C. (1975). Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation. In Language and Sex (pp. 105-129). Massachusetts: Newbury House.