From Needs Analysis to Instructional Design: Developing a Metacognitive Instructional Model for Teaching Workplace English Listening and Speaking in Thai Higher Education
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Metacognitive strategies can potentially develop EFL students’ English listening and speaking skills and foster metacognitive awareness and systematic, self-regulated learning. Nonetheless, metacognitive instruction has been limited to stand-alone interventions investigating listening or speaking skill development. Consequently, this mixed-methods study conducts a needs analysis—indispensable for instructional model development—to investigate the learning needs and target needs of 88 Thai EFL undergraduates, five Thai EFL teachers, and 28 employers, with the aim of developing a metacognitive instructional model for teaching workplace English listening and speaking at a Thai public university. Employing data and methodological triangulation, the instruments included online questionnaires, semi-structured interview questions, and a classroom observation protocol. Semi-structured interviews were conducted until data saturation was reached with fourteen undergraduates, five teachers, and four employers. Three randomly selected classrooms of the English for Working Skills course were observed twice. Data were analysed quantitatively and qualitatively. The findings revealed learning needs related to segregated-skill instruction and integrated-skill practice, incorporating diverse activities and integrating 21st-century skills. Target needs comprised necessities, lacks, and wants associated with workplace success. A theoretical, contextually informed metacognitive instructional model is then proposed, comprising in-class and out-of-class sections, with activities structured around the planning, monitoring, and reflecting phases to promote English communication and self-regulation.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).References
Alvarez, C. L., Tamayo, M. R., & dos Santos, J. C. (2024). Factors influencing the development of speaking skills among Ecuadorian EFL learners: Teachers’ perspectives. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 319–331. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v14i2.74889
Alzubi, A. A., Nazim, M., & Ahamad, J. (2024). Examining the effect of a collaborative learning intervention of EFL students’ English learning and social interaction. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 8(2), 26–46. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202425541
Basturkmen, H. (2010). Developing courses in English for specific purposes. Palgrave McMillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230290518
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Choksiri, N., & Sroinam, R. (2020). Needs of undergraduate students in studying English for Specific Purposes for working in ASEAN Economic Community (AEC). Udon Thani Rajabhat University Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 9(2), 1–18.
Chyung, S. Y., Barkin, J. R., & Shamsy, J. A. (2018). Evidence-based survey design: The use of negatively worded items in surveys. Performance Improvement, 57(3), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.21749
Cubalit, A. N. (2016). Listening comprehension problems of Thai English learners. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Language, Literature & Society (pp. 207-214). International Center for Research and Development. https://uniqueca.com/archives/proceedings/LLS2016.pdf
Dörnyei, Z., & Taguchi, T. (2010). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203864739
Dudley-Evans, T., & St. John, M. J. (1998). Development in English for Specific Purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge University Press.
Fetters, M. D., & Freshwater, D. (2015). Publishing a methodological mixed methods research article. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9(3), 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815594687
Flavell, H. J. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of genitive-development inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911.
Franzese, M., & Iuliano, A. (2019). Descriptive statistics. In S. Ranganathan, M. Gribskov, K. Nakai, & C. Schönbach (Eds.), Encyclopedia of bioinformatics and computational biology volume 1 (pp. 672–684). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809633-8.20354-3
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2019). IBM SPSS statistics 25 step by step: A simple guide and reference (15th ed.) Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351033909
Goh, C. C. M. (2014). Reconceptualising second language oracy instruction: Metacognitive engagement and direct teaching in listening. The Asian Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 2, 1–20. https://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/index.php/AJELP/article/view/1096
Gross, S., Hankeln, C., Rösike, K. A., & Prediger, S. (2025). How do expert and novice teachers monitor and enhance student understanding? Qualitative comparisons informing the design of a digital formative assessment platform. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 30, 991–1020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09755-0
Hyland, K. (2006). English for academic purposes: An advanced resource book. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203006603
Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science and Medicine, 292, Article 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523
Huang, T. T. (2023). Sentence structures in learning English. Journal of Ethnic Minorities Research, 12(3), 51–56. https://doi.org/10.54163/ncdt/189
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for Specific Purposes: A learning-centred approach. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733031
Idrizi, E. (2022). The 21st century skills and language education. In M. Stevkovska, E. Idrizi, & I. Miftari-Fetishi (Eds.), Contemporary issues in language teaching (pp. 147–165). International Balkan University. https://ibupress.com/Pages/Book/Details?id=HwAAAA
Jalolova, S. M. (2023). Basic approaches of teaching integrated skills. In Proceedings of INTCESS 2023-10th International Conference on Education & Education of Social Sciences (pp. 75-86). https://www.ocerints.org/intcess23_e-publication/papers/Shakhnoza%20Mukhamedjanovna%20Jalolova.pdf
Józsa, K., & Morgan, G. A. (2017). Reversed items in Likert scales: Filtering out invalid responders. Journal of Psychological and Educational Research, 25(1), 7–25.
Jupp, V. (2006). The SAGE dictionary of social research methods. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020116
Kanokpermpoon, M. (2023). Foundation English course development for Thai tertiary education: Learners’ perceived needs and factor analysis. rEFLections, 30(3), 671–694. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/reflections/article/view/267999/179724
Kerr, P. (2017). How much time should we give to speaking practice? (Part of the Cambridge Papers in ELT series). Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/gb/files/8415/7488/4554/CambridgePapersinELT_TimeForSpeaking_2017_ONLINE.pdf
Kerr, P. (2019). The use of L1 in English language teaching. (Part of the Cambridge Papers in ELT series). Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/gb/files/6315/7488/4318/CambridgePapersInELT_UseOfL1_2019_ONLINE-2.pdf
Kim, S. H. (2021). Analyzing workplace English communication use and needs: Insights from Korean corporate employees. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 25(1), 1–24. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1304294.pdf
Kobayashi, A. (2018). Investigating the effects of metacognitive instruction in listening for EFL learners. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 15(2), 310–328. https://dx.doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2018.15.2.4.310
Kobayashi, A. (2020). Examining the effects of metacognitive instruction in oral communication for EFL learners. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 17(2), 597–615. https://dx.doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2020.17.2.18.597
Karatsareas, P. (2022). Semi-structured interviews. In R. Kircher, & L. Zipp (Eds.), Research methods in language attitudes (pp. 99–113). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108867788.010
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
Mai, L. X., Ngoc, L. K., & Thao, L. T. (2024). Factors hindering student participation in English-speaking classes: Student and lecturer perceptions. SAGE Open, 14(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241266297
Maneepakhathorn, R. (2023). An exploratory study of reflective dialogue journal writing of EFL graduate students in the English as a foreign language context. rEFLections, 30(1), 38–58. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v30i1.264474
Mekki, O. M., Ismail, A. M., & Hamdan, D. M. (2022). Student engagement in English language classes: An evaluative study. Sohag University International Journal of Educational Research, 6(6), 15–52. https://suijer.journals.ekb.eg/article_253735_28cdaf92c4e04cd8c8a30e963f6f5afa.pdf
Nation, I. S. P., & Newton, J. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL listening and speaking. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203891704
Ngonkum, S., & Kisawadkorn, K. (2024). Effects of the listening strategy self-regulated learning model on Thai EFL undergraduate students’ listening comprehension. Journal of Mekong Societies, 20(1), 131–157. https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/mekongjournal/article/view/264337
Phothongsunan, S. (2022). Thai EFL undergraduate learners’ needs for English for Specific Purposes at present. International Journal of Multidisciplinary in Management and Tourism, 6(1), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.14456/ijmmt.2022.2
Pitikornpuangpetcha, C., & Suwanarak, K. (2021). Teachers’ beliefs and teaching practices about Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in a Thai EFL context. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 14(2), 1–27. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/253254/171950
Poláková, M., Suleimanová, J. H., Madzík, P., Copuš, L., Molnárová, I., & Polednová, J. (2023). Soft skills and their importance in the labour market under the conditions of Industry 5.0. Heliyon, 9(8), Article e18670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18670
Prasongngern, P., & Soontornwipast, K. (2023). Effects of listening strategy instruction incorporating intensive and extensive listening on listening skills and metacognitive awareness. International Journal of Instruction, 16(4), 155–172. https://www.e-iji.net/dosyalar/iji_2023_4_10.pdf
Qiu, X., Zhang, T., & Dong, S. (2024). Self-regulated strategy instruction: Insights from ESP teachers at a Chinese university and vocational college. System, 120, Article 103188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103188
Rahmawati, E., Herlina, H., & Lustyantie, N. (2025). Unleashing English-speaking proficiency: The role of academic environment, technology, and linguistic adaptability evidence from Indonesia. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101821
Richards, J. C. (2008). Teaching listening and speaking: From theory to practice. Cambridge University Press.
Robillos, R. J., & Bustos, I. G. (2022). Learners’ listening skill and metacognitive awareness through metacognitive strategy instruction with pedagogical cycle. International Journal of Instruction, 15(3), 393–412. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1355591.pdf
Saengboon, S., Kosin, P., & Toomaneejinda, A. (2022). The roles of grammar in English language teaching: Local viewpoints. PASAA, 63(1), 179–204. https://digital.car.chula.ac.th/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1748&context=pasaa
Schlegel, M. J. (1995). A handbook of instructional and training program design (ED383281). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED383281.pdf
Serafini, E. J., Lake, J. B., & Long, M. H. (2015). Needs analysis for specialized learner populations: Essential methodological improvements. Journal of English for Specific Purposes, 40, 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2015.05.002
Shamsi, E., & Bozorgian, H. (2024). Collaborative listening using multimedia through metacognitive instruction: A case study with less‑skilled and more‑skilled EFL learners. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 9, Article 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-023-00248-8
Shin, M. H. (2024). Improving English speaking skills in a college general English course using metacognitive strategies. English Teaching, 79(3), 99–121. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.79.3.202409.99
Soranastaporn, S. (2018). ESP in Thailand: Practical English training for professionals. The Liberal Arts Journal, Mahidol University, 1(2), 7–28. https://so02.tcithaijo.org/index.php/lajournal/article/view/254874/171489
Sukavatee, P., & Khlaisang, J. (2023). A survey of research into English teaching approaches and instructional media in Thailand. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 16(2), 752–769. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/266984
Sukserm, P. (2024). Determining the appropriate sample size in EFL pilot studies. Journal of Research Methodology, 37(3), 245–264. https://so12.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jrm/article/view/1532
Tanewong, S. (2019). Metacognitive pedagogical sequence for less-proficient Thai EFL listeners: A comparative investigation. RELC Journal, 50(1), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688218754942
Tantiwich, K., & Sinwongsuwat, K. (2021). Thai university students’ problems of language use in English conversation. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 14(2), 598–626. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/253282
Teng, M. F. (2025). Metacognition in language teaching. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009581295
Thongwichit, N., & Ulla, M. B. (2024). Translanguaging pedagogy in Thailand’s English medium of instruction classrooms: Teachers’ perspectives and practices. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language (TESL-EJ), 27(4). https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.27108a7
Tran, T. Q., & Duong, T. M. (2020). EFL learners’ perceptions of factors influencing learner autonomy development. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 41(1), 194–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2018.02.009
Turner, R. C., & Carlson, L. (2003). Indexes of Item-Objective Congruence for multidimensional items. International Journal of Testing, 3(2), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327574IJT0302_5
Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. C. M. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action. Routledge.
Vibulphol, J. (2016). Students’ motivation and learning and teachers’ motivational strategies in English classrooms in Thailand. English Language Teaching, 9(4), 64–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n4p64
Watanapokakul, S., & Sitajalabhorn, W. (2023). A needs analysis for English as a foreign language instruction for Thai senior secondary school students with hearing impairment. rEFLections, 30(2), 428–467. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v30i2.267417
Wongkumsai, S. (2023). The importance of English in Thai society and in technology. NEU Academic and Research Journal, 13(2), 232–239. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/neuarj/article/view/264395/180017
Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd ed.). Harper and Row.
Yan, W., Lowell, V. L., & Yang, L. (2024). Developing English language learners’ speaking skills through applying a situated learning approach in VR-enhanced learning experiences. Virtual Reality, 28(167), 21–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-024-01061-5
