Strategy for Representing Animals in Zeami’s Noh Plays

Main Article Content

Winai Jamornsuriya

Abstract

Gods and animals are closely related. Some animals are the servants of the gods, while others are the vehicles of the gods. This research aims at studying a strategy for representing animals in seven of Zeami’s Noh plays that feature gods as the main characters: Ukon, Oimatsu, Shiga, Takasago, Fujisan, Houjougawa, and Yumiyawata. The research found that horses, turtles, insects, fish, and birds (such as cranes, pigeons, and wild geese) were found in the Noh plays. The animals contributed to the portrayal of the main characters and the scenes in the Noh plays. The strategy for representing animals were divided into four forms: symbol, simile, personification, and description. The animals used as the symbol were cranes and turtles. Those used as the simile were cranes, wild geese, and birds (Common Noun without specific type). Those used as the personification was insects. Whereas the animals featured in the description included pigeons, uguisu, birds, horses, and fish.

Article Details

Section
บทความวิจัย

References

อรรถยา สุวรรณระดา. (2557). พืช สัตว์ ตัวเลข กับตำนานยุคเทพเจ้าของญี่ปุ่น. กรุงเทพ: สำนักพิมพ์แห่งจุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.

生駒哲郎 (2018)『畜生・餓鬼・地獄の中世仏教史』吉川弘文館.

片桐洋一 (2004)『歌枕歌ことば辞典』笠間書院.

古代中世文学論考刊行会 (2023)『古代中世文学論考 第51集』新典社.

小島憲之と新井栄蔵 (1989)『古今和歌集 新日本古典文学大系5』岩波書店.

小林祥次郎 (2009)『日本古典博物事典』勉誠出版.

小松和彦 (2005)「富士山―『富士山』」『観世』 72 (7), 42-47.

佐成健太郎 (1982)『謡曲大観』第一巻. 明治書院.

佐成健太郎 (1982)『謡曲大観』第二巻. 明治書院.

佐成健太郎 (1982)『謡曲大観』第三巻. 明治書院.

佐成健太郎 (1982)『謡曲大観』第四巻. 明治書院.

寺山宏 (2002)『和漢古典動物考』 八坂書房.

西中道と得永健太郎 (2018).「食と罪―放生会に見る宗教的「解決」」『武蔵野女子大学能楽資料センター紀要』 30, 91-111.

西野春雄 (1987)『能・狂言 第三巻 能の作者と作品』岩波書店.

宮田登 (1993)「竹取物語と富士信仰」『国文学』 38 (4), 28-31.