Intentional Intermediate Vocabulary Instruction through Vocabulary Awareness and Reading Proficiency A Case Study of Thai Japanese Learners

Main Article Content

Natthira Tuptim

Abstract

This study aimed to (1) examine the effects of intentional intermediate-level vocabulary instruction through vocabulary awareness on learners’ reading ability in terms of reading speed and reading accuracy; (2) investigate the influence of Japanese language achievement on learners’ reading ability in terms of reading speed and accuracy when they were taught through intentional intermediate-level vocabulary instruction based on vocabulary awareness; and (3) examine the extent to which Japanese language achievement and reading speed predict changes in reading accuracy. The participants were 55 third-year undergraduate students enrolled in grammar-related courses in the first semester of the 2024 academic year. They were selected using purposive sampling. The instructional intervention lasted 15 weeks and integrated intentional intermediate-level vocabulary instruction through vocabulary awareness. The research instrument was a reading ability test consisting of five reading passages. The data independent using a paired-samples t-test to compare differences in reading ability before and after instruction, regression analysis and multiple regression analysis to examine the influence and predictive power of the independent variables on learners’ reading ability. The results revealed that intentional intermediate-level vocabulary instruction based on vocabulary awareness significantly enhanced learners’ reading speed. However, although post-test scores for reading accuracy increased, the difference was not statistically significant. Furthermore, the results of the multiple regression analysis indicated that Japanese language achievement was a significant predictor of learners’ reading ability when they received intentional intermediate-level vocabulary instruction through vocabulary awareness.

Article Details

Section
บทความวิจัย

References

ณัฏฐิรา ทับทิม. (2567a). การทวนสอบความชัดเจนของความสัมพันธ์ทางความหมายระหว่างคำคันจิ 2 อักษรกับคันจิที่เป็นส่วนประกอบของคำจากมุมมองผู้ใช้ภาษาญี่ปุ่นชาวไทย. วารสารญี่ปุ่นศึกษา, 41(1), 1-23.

ณัฏฐิรา ทับทิม. (2567b). การสร้างความตระหนักรู้เรื่องระบบคำของผู้เรียนภาษาญี่ปุ่นชาวไทยด้วยแบบฝึกคำศัพท์คันจิภาษาญี่ปุ่น. JSN Journal, 14(2), 102-123.

สำนักงานราชบัณฑิตยสภา. (2560). พจนานุกรมศัพท์ภาษาศาสตร์ (ภาษาศาสตร์ทั่วไป) ฉบับราชบัณฑิตยสภา. กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักงาน.

Carlisle, J.F. (2003). Morphology matters in learning to read: A commentary. Reading Psychology 24(3-4), 291-322.

Campbell, D. T. & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. U.S.A.: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Cheng, X., Yin, L., & Zhang, H. (2025). Morphological awareness and vocabulary knowledge in monolingual and bilingual learners: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Bilingualism, 0(0). doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069241311029

Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2020). Teaching and researching reading (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Kirby, J. R., Deacon, S. H., Georgiou, G., Geier, K., Chan, J., & Parrila, R. (2025). Effects of morphological awareness, naming speed, and phonological awareness on reading skills from Grade 3 to Grade 5. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 253, 106188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106188

Lee, J.-H., & Hasebe, Y. (2013–2024). jReadability 日本語文章難易度判別システム. jReadability. Retrieved May 1-31, 2024, from https://jreadability.net/sys/ja

Liu, Y., Groen, M. A., & Cain, K. (2024). The association between morphological awareness and reading comprehension in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 42, 1-17.

Macalister, J. & Nation, I.S.P. (2020). Language Curriculum Design. Routledge.

Nation, I.S.P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge University Press.

Nation, I.S.P. (2017). How vocabulary is learned. Indonesian JELT (Journal of English Language Teaching), 12 (1), 1-14.

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en

Spencer, M., Muse, A., & Wagner, R.K. (2015). Examining the underlying dimensions of morphological awareness and vocabulary knowledge. Read Writ 28, 959–988. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9557-0

Tighe, E. L. & Binder, K. S. (2015). An investigation of morphological awareness and processing in adults with low literacy. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(2), 245-273. doi: 10.1017/S0142716413000222. PMID: 25926711; PMCID: PMC4405785.

Tuptim, N. (2023). Japanese Industrial Technical Terms: Word Formation, Word Type and Word Pedagogical Applications. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 44(3), 797-806.

Wang, Z., Ding, W., Xie, R., Wu, X., Wenren, S., & Xia, Y. (2025). Exploring the dynamic interplays of morphological awareness and reading skills in Chinese children. Child Development, 96(3), 1017–1033. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.14214

Warnby, M. (2024). Relating academic reading with academic vocabulary and general English proficiency to assess standards of students’ university-preparedness: The case of IELTS and CEFR B2. Studies in Higher Education, 49(4), 506–523. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2024.2318434

Wei, Z., & Nation, P. (2013). The word part technique: A very useful vocabulary teaching technique. Modern English Teacher, 22(1), 12-16.

佐々木仁子・松本紀子 (2005)『日本能力試験対策日本語総まとめ問題集 新基準対応2級[読解編]』アスク.

桑原直子 (2009)「日本語教育における中級に関する一考察―中級の定義と中級教科書の分類―『倉敷芸術科学大学紀要』 (14), 213-222.

塚田泰彦 (2021)「語彙学習方略としての語構成要素の意識化」『全国大学国語教育学会 第140回大会』, 245-248.

日比谷潤子 (1998)「複合短縮語」『世界の日本語教育』8, 47-65.

李在鎬 (2016)「日本語教育のための文章難易度に関する研究」『早稲田日本語教育学』 21, 1-16.

山方純子 (2008)「日本語学習者のテクスト理解における未知語の意味推測―L2知識と母語背景が及ぼす影響―」『日本語教育』(139), 42-51.

山下喜代 (2006)「意図的語彙学習のための方法と教材―人物を表す接尾辞を例にして―」『講座日本語教育』42, 42-59.