Professional ethics of school administrators on perceived by teachers under the of the Trang Primary Educational Service Area Office 1
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aimed to 1) study the practice of professional ethics of school administrators. according to the viewpoint of the teachers 2) to compare the professional ethics of the school administrators according to the teacher's perspective, according to the variables, gender, age, educational level Teacher's academic position and work experience of teachers. The sample consisted of 317 teachers under the Trang Primary Educational Service Area Office 1, Academic Year 1, 2019 by stratified random sampling. The tool used to collect data in the research is a questionnaire which is divided into 2 parts. Part 1 was a questionnaire about general information of the respondents. It was a survey form and part 2 was a questionnaire with questions about the professional ethics practice of executives. It was a 5-level Likert rating scale with a coefficient of confidence equal to .90. The statistics used in the data analysis were percentage, mean, standard deviation. One-way ANOVA and the Fisher's Least Significant Difference (LSD) test.
The results of the research found that 1) professional ethics of school administrators according to the point of view of the teacher overall and in all aspects. They were at a very good level. 2) Teachers with different gender, age, educational background and academic standing. All have a view to the practice of professional ethics of school administrators. The overall picture is no different. Considering various factors, it was found that most of them were not different but differed in 3 sub issues. 1) Teachers with more than 10 years of experience have a view of their own ethics. higher than teachers with 5-10 years of experience with a statistical significance of .05 2) Teachers with 5-10 years of experience had a view of their own ethics higher statistical significance of .05 than teachers with more than 10 years of experience. 3) Female teachers had views on social ethics. significantly higher
Article Details
References
Amornwiwat, S (2006). Role of Educational Institutions in Mental Development. Bangkok: Office of Education Council. (in Thai)
Athonkit, O. (2015). Comparison of Professional Ethical Practices among School Administrators under the Office of Pathum Thani Private Education Commission. (Master of Education Thesis). Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi, Faculty of Industrial Education, Program in Educational Administration Technokogy. (in Thai)
Chang-in, A. (2016). Relationship between Professional Ethical Practices and Administration Competency of School Administrators based on the Elementary School Standards of the Teachers’ Council in schools under the Central Krungthon Group in Bangkok Metropolitan. (Master of Education Thesis). Dhonburi Rajabhat University, Faculty of Education, Program in Educational Administration. (in Thai)
Chumjit, Y. (2010). Teachership. Bangkok: Odeon Store. (in Thai)
Jitjarijan, J. (2014). Ethics: Moral Philosophy for Professional Educator. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University. (in Thai)
Makmisap, A. (2014). Ethics for Educational Administrators. Suthiparithat Journal. 28(87), 43.
(in Thai)
Ministry of Education. (2003). Manual of Regulations for Private Schools in Basic Education. Bangkok: Express Transportation Organization of Thailand. (in Thai)
Nanphakdi, J. (2013). Professional Ethical Practices of School Administrators Following the Sangahavatthu [Four Bases of Sympathy] in the Perception of Teachers under the Office of Secondary Educational Service Area 42. (Master of Education Thesis). Chulalongkorn University, Faculty of Education, Program in Educational Administration. (in Thai)
Office of the Civil Service Commission. (2014). Implementation of Competency Modeling for Human Resources Management. Bangkok: Atsamnao. (in Thai)
Phanit, W. (2012). Learning Strategies for Students in the 21st Century. Bangkok: Sodsri Saritwong Foundation. (in Thai)
Phetkulkit, Y. (2011). Professional Ethical Practices of School Administrators in the Perception of Teachers in Chonburi’s Ban Bueng District under the Officer of Chonburi Primary Educational Service Area 1. (Master of Education Thesis). Burapha University, Faculty of Education, Program in Educational Administration. (in Thai)
Phongphan-ngam, K. (2017). Teachers’ Attitudes towards Professional Ethical Practices of Chitralada School Administrators under the Office of the Private Education Commission. (Master of Education Thesis). Ramkhamhaeng University, Faculty of Education, Program in Educational Administration. (in Thai)
Quitugua, F.J. (1975). An Investigation of Factors Which Effect Teacher Satisfaction and
Tenurse. Dissertation Abstracts International. 30(12), 1253-A.
Teachers and Educational Personnel Council Act. (2003). Royal Thai Government Gazette. 121 Special Chapter 79 A., pp. 22-47. (in Thai)
Sanrattana, W. (2010). Three-Dimensional Concept of School Administrations for Effective Educational Administrators. Khon Kaen: Klung Nana Wittaya. (in Thai)
Sriladlao, P. (2009). Professional Ethical Practices of School Administrators under the Office of Nakhon Ratchasima Educational Service Area 1-7. (Master of Education Thesis). Nakhon Ratchasima Rajabaht University. (in Thai)
Thongdiwiset, N. (2017). Professional Ethical Practices of School Administrators in the Perception of Teachers of Ayutthaya Witthayalai School under the Office of the Secondary Education. Educational Service Area 3. (Master of Education Thesis). Ramkhamhaeng University, Faculty of Education, Program in Educational Administration. (in Thai)
Trongkamali, C. (2016). Teachers’ Attitudes towards Professional Ethical Practices of School Administrators under the Office of Kanchanaburi Primary Education Service Area 2. (Master of Education Thesis). Ramkhamhaeng University, Faculty of Education, Program in Educational Administration. (in Thai)