The Development of Strategic Digital Leadership Model of School Administrators Under the Office of the Primary Educational
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objectives of this mixed-method research are 1) to analyze the components and methods for developing strategic digital leadership of school administrators, 2) construct and develop a strategic digital leadership model for school administrators, and 3) validate and verify the strategic digital leadership development model for school administrators under Primary Educational Service Area Offices. The sample group consisted of 226 school administrators selected through purposive sampling. Research instruments included questionnaires, interview forms, and model component evaluation forms. Statistics employed for data analysis comprised frequency distribution, percentage, mean, standard deviation, along with exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.
The research findings indicate that 1) the components constituting the strategic digital leadership development model for educational administrators comprise ten elements: possessing a digital vision, creating a digital learning culture, professional operational excellence, digital management, digital citizenship, digital strategic thinking, digital strategy formulation, adaptation to the digital era, and the establishment of digital collaborative networks and defining the digital vision, 2) the DSL Model constitutes the strategic digital leadership development framework for school administrators, comprising five distinct modalities: workshops, brainstorming, coaching, study visits, and seminars. The implementation proceeds through the STAR process, grounded in the principles of good governance, continuity, and sustainability, and Verification and validation of the model revealed that its suitability, feasibility, consistency, and utility were evaluated at the highest level across all dimensions, and 3) verification and validation of the model revealed that its suitability, feasibility, consistency, and utility were evaluated at the highest level across all dimension.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Atbut, P. (2019). Strategic Leadership model of basic educational institution administrators under the junisdiction of the Secondary Educational Service Area office Area 13 .(Doctor of Philosophy). Nakhon Si Thammarat Rajabhat University, Faculty of Education, Program in Educational Administration. (in Thai)
Buachu,T. (2019). The Status of Digital Leadership of Education Management Administrators. Journal of Education Studies, 13(2), 294-285. (in Thai)
Cabinet Secretariat (2018). 20-year national strategy 2018-2037. Retrieved 2023, January 2, from https://www.soc.go.th/ (in Thai)
Chuewangkham, E. (2020). Comm]ponents of digital Leadership among educational in stitution administrators Udon Thani Primary Educational Service Area office, Area 4. (Master of Education Thesis). Knon Kaen University, Faculty of Education, Program in Educational Administration. (in Thai)
Duggan, E. (2021). Leadership Development : A Review and Agenda for Future Research. Retrieved 2020, May 20, from https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com
Elliott, T. (2017). An Examination of Open and Technology Leadership in Managerial Practices of Education System EURSSIA. Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13,(1), 119-131.
Keesukphan, E. (2019). Educational institution administration in the digital age. Retrieved 2020, January 20, from http://www.turueplookpanya.coom/knowledge/content. (in Thai)
Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan D.W. (1970). “Determining Sample Size for Research Activities.”. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610
Leesakul, P. (2020). Guidelines for developing technological leadership of educational institution administrators under the Chaiyaphum Primary Education Service Area office, Area 1. (Master of Education). Maha Sarakham Rajabhat University, Faculty of Education, Program in Educational Administration. (in Thai)
Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council. (2023). Plan 13. Retrieved 2023, January 2, from https://www.nesds.go.th/ (in Thai)
Onlaor, C. (2020). Digital Era Leadership for Educational Administration. Asian Graduate College Journal, 10(1), 119-108. (in Thai)
Pakothang, P. (2018). Digital Leadership for professional School administrators Ubon Ratchathani Faculty of Education. (Master of Education). Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat University, Faculty of Education, Program in Educational Administration. (in Thai)
Phapabutr, C. (2020). Technological leadership development model for School administrators in Digital age. (Doctor of Philosophy dissertation). Sakon Nakhon Rajabhat University, Faculty of Education, Program in Educational Administration. (in Thai)
Phongsiri, N. (2017). Leaders in the digital age. Retrieved 2021, December 21, from http://www.dharmniti co.th. (in Thai)
Suksaen, K. (2020). Digital Leadership development model of administrators of affiliated schools. St. Gabriel Foundation of Thailand. (Doctor of Philosophy). Rangsit University, Faculty of Education, Program in Educational Administration. (in Thai)
World Economic Forum. (2020). The Global Competitiveness Report 2019-2020. Retrieved 2020, January 21, from http://www. Weforum.org/events/world-economic 2020.
