A Study on The Current Situation for The Badminton Elective Course at Minnan Normal University
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines how the badminton elective course at Minnan Normal University is currently taught, with an emphasis on student engagement, instructional efficacy, and implementation challenges. Stratified sampling based on grade levels was used to gather data from 259 students using a mixed-methods approach that includes questionnaire surveys, field observations, and interviews. The findings show that although badminton is still a very popular elective, a number of serious problems still exist, such as a lack of qualified teachers, inadequate facilities, and antiquated teaching strategies. Students' perceptions of different course elements, including inspiration, teaching quality, emotional engagement, interaction, and perceived impact, did not significantly correlate with their age, according to Pearson correlation analysis. Students between the ages of 18 and 24 share this consistency.
Additionally, qualitative responses indicate that students value badminton for developing life skills like teamwork, perseverance, and emotional resilience in addition to its physical benefits. The study points out flaws in the way the curriculum is currently designed and assessed, pointing out a lack of technological integration and a dependence on summative assessments. Three main suggestions are put forth to address these issues: 1) streamlining the curriculum using a modular, tiered teaching approach catered to various ability levels, 2) moving toward more experiential and interactive teaching methods, like flipped classrooms and gamified learning; and 3) raising the bar for teacher preparation and qualification in order to guarantee high-quality instruction. With wider ramifications for the advancement of holistic student development and campus sports culture, the findings are intended to offer practical suggestions for enhancing university elective sports education.
Article Details
References
Badminton World Federation [BWF]. (2022). Shuttle Time: Global school badminton program manual (Rev. ed.). https://corporate.bwfbadminton.com/shuttle-time/
Chen, C. J. (2020). The importance of a standardized teaching environment for badminton education. Journal of Physical Education Facilities, 15(3), 67–71.
Chen, D. F. (2021). Engaging students in badminton teaching: The importance of interest and participation. China Sports Publishing House.
Chen, L., & Wang, Y. (2022). Wearable technology in racket sports skill analysis: A systematic review. Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology, 236(3), 215–230.
https://doi.org/10.1177/17543371211073528
Cochran, W. G. (1953). Sampling techniques. John Wiley & Sons.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.
Gomez, M.-A., Jimenez, S., & Navarro, R. (2023). Facility standards for racket sports in educational institutions: A Delphi study. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 18(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541221113872
He, Z. M. (2021). The role of match-based teaching in developing tactical awareness in badminton. International Journal of Physical Education Studies, 19(6), 67–72.
Johnson, R., & Harrison, L. (2022). Cultural determinants of sport participation motives:
A 40-nation study. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 58, Article 102086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.102086
Khoo, S., & Lim, Y. W. (2023). Badminton versus meditation: Comparative effects on university students' stress biomarkers. Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology, 17(1),
–18. https://doi.org/10.1123/jcsp.2022-0039
Lee, H. K., & Wong, D. (2021). Cognitive benefits of badminton: A meta-analysis. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 128(4), 1431–1455. https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125211017832
Li, C. (2021). Strategies for skill improvement in college badminton teaching. Journal of Physical Education, 32(1), 62–66.
Li, F. (2019). Application of combining technical training and tactics in badminton teaching. Sports and Health, 40(4), 110–113.
Li, H. (2021). Research on the reform and innovation path of college physical education curriculum. China School Physical Education, 1, 12–14.
Li, S. X. (2021). Exploring diverse approaches in university badminton instruction: Moving beyond traditional methods. Journal of Physical Education Research, 30(2), 42–47.
Martínez-López, F. J., Hita-Contreras, F., & Lara-Sánchez, A. J. (2023). Virtual reality in badminton training: Immediate effects on service accuracy. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1125023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1125023
O'Reilly, N., Berger, I. E., & Hernandez, T. (2021). Social cohesion in university sport clubs: A cross-sport analysis. Sport Management Review, 24(2), 340–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2020.06.002
Oslin, J., & Mitchell, S. (2020). Game performance assessment in physical education. Human Kinetics.
Tanaka, R., Sato, M., & Nielsen, J. B. (2021). Collectivism and sport participation in ASEAN universities: The badminton case. Asian Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsep.2021.03.001