Information Technology for Collaborative e-Learning: the Measurement and Evaluation of TQF’s Learning Outcomes
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Collaborative E-Learning (CEL) is one of modern learning methods, which is widely used in the 21st century. The learners can learn on demand, independently, and outside the classroom without time and place barrier. Information Technology provides the learners for this matter. They can create new knowledge together, which is a way of supporting life-long learning. In order to gain the quality, efficiency and effectiveness of collaborative e-Learning, this research addresses the Learning Outcomes (LOs) for undergraduate level defined by Thailand Qualification Framework (TQF). The general education course entitled Information Technology for Life conducted by the Phetchabun Rajabhat University is used as a case study. This research addresses the collaborative e-Learning that can support both generic and specific TQF’s learning outcomes. The LOs’ measurement and evaluation is collected by using e-Participation, e-Examination and e-Assignment. This data is then analyzed by using mathematical method. The result of this work shows TQF’s LOs at the students’ group and individual levels by using information technology for the future improvement.
Article Details
Copyright Notice articles, information, images, etc. was published in this Journal of Yala Rajabhat University is a copyright of the journal Yala Rajabhat University. If any person or deparment wants to bring all or part of it for publish or take any action. Authorization is required in written form from the Journal of Yala Rajabhat University only.
References
and Purchase Intentions: Evidence from Chinese Online Visitors. International Journal of
Hospitality Management, Elsevier, 391-402.
2.Baykul, Y., Gursel, M., Salak, H., Ertekin, E., Yazici, E., Dulger, O., et al. (2010). A Validity and
Reliability Study of Grasha-Riechmann Student Learning Style Scale. International Journal
of Social, Behavioral, Education, Business and Industrial Engineering, 4(3), 323-330.
3.Blair, N. (2012). Technology Integration for New 21St Century Learner: Today’s Students Need
Educators to Re-envision the Role of Technology in the Classroom [Online]. Retrieved
February 25, 2016, from: https://www.naesp.org/sites/default/files/Blair_JF12.pdf.
4.Chaibuth, D., Thongboonnak, K., Sankas, S. & Tantranont, N. (2015). The Success Factors for
Using Information Technology for Collaborative Learning Development via Online Social
Network (in Thai). Research and Development Journal, Walaialongkorn, Science and
Technology, 10(2), 1-11.
5.Davis, F. D. (1985). A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-user
Information Systems: Theory and Results. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT Sloan School of
Management [Online]. Retrieved February 14, 2015, from: https://dspace.mit.edu/
handle/1721.1/15192.
6.DeLone, W. H. & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems
Success: A Ten Year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 9(4), 9-30.
7.Funilkun, S. (2008). e-Democracy System Development Framework and Its Quality. Ph.D. Thesis.
School of Information Technology, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi.
8.Hatthasak, M. (2014). Building the Understanding and Knowledge of Learning Process. Kasetsart
University, Faculty of Education [Online]. Retrieved February 24, 2015, from: regis.rmutp.
ac.th/km_regis/stock/2557/2-57.ppt. (in Thai)
9.Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (2001). Learning Together and Alone: An Overview. Asia Pacific
Journal of Education, 2(1), 95-105.
10.Khuprasit, A. (2013). Personality Assessment Form [Online]. Retrieved October 17, 2015, from:
http://www.tistr.or.th/tistrblog/?tag=16-personality-factor. (in Thai)
11.Raksri, P. (2010). Social Network [Online]. Retrieved September 24, 2015, in Engineers Council,
from: http://www.coe.or.th/e_engineers/knc_detail.php?id=170. (in Thai)
12.Schroer, W. J. (2014). Generations X, Y, Z and the Others - Cont’d [Online]. Retrieved November
18, 2015, from: http://www.socialmarketing.org/newsletter/features/generation3.htm.
13.Soller, A. L. (2001). Supporting Social Interaction in an Intelligent Collaborative Learning System.
International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education [Online]. Retrieved February
25, 2016, From: http://iaied.org/pub/980/file/980_paper.pdf.
14.Sripan, P. (2012). The Relationship between Five Personality Components and the Effectiveness
of Working: A Case Study of Staffs at the Tisco Bank- Control and Loan Section. MBA
in Management. Srinakharinwirot University.
15.Suktorn, W., Yaowapanee, W., Sirichirakan, W.J. & Lungpadit, P. (2013). The Development of
Learning System According to Information Technology Quality. Journal of Yala Rajabhat
University, 8(1), 52-63. (in Thai)
16.The Office of Higher Education Commission (OHEC). (2008). Higher Education Standard and
Related Standard Regulations. Bangkok: Parbpim Partnership. (in Thai)
17.ThongThai, W. (2013). The Learning Evaluation [Online]. Retrieved August 18, 2015, from: http://
www.bpcd.net/new_subject/library/research/document/sopida/research/ku/develop/08.
pdf. (in Thai)
