A Development ICT Competency Indicator for Academic Personnel in Rajabhat Universities
Main Article Content
Abstract
The research objectives to develop indicators of Information and Communication Technology Competency of Academic Personnel in Rajabhat University and to test the congruence of developed model with empirical data. The sample size of 204 Rajabhat University lecturers was derived by Comrey& Lee (1992) random sampling. The second-order confirmatory factor analysis of the indicator model in Information and Communication Technology Competency of Academic Personnel in Rajabhat Universities was congruent with empirical data including Chi-Square = 232.16 at degree of freedom = 239, probability = .61224, the Chi-Square was not significant. In addition, the GFI, and AGFI were .92, and .87 respectively. Moreover, the RMSEA was .000. It was summarized that Information and Communication Technology Competency of Academic Personnel in Rajabhat Universities consisted of 6 components and 28 indicators which were 1) the fundamentals of ICT had 13 indicators 2) the learning management of ICT had 6 indicators 3) the ethics of ICT had 3 indicators 4) the measurement and evaluation classroom of ICT had 1 indicators 5) the classroom management of ICT had 3 indicators 6) the person development had 2 indicators.
Article Details
Copyright Notice articles, information, images, etc. was published in this Journal of Yala Rajabhat University is a copyright of the journal Yala Rajabhat University. If any person or deparment wants to bring all or part of it for publish or take any action. Authorization is required in written form from the Journal of Yala Rajabhat University only.
References
2. Kaiyawan, Y. (2001). Multivariate Statistical Analysis for Research. Doctoral Dissertation. Department of Technological Management. Phetchaburi Rajabhat University. (in Thai)
3. Ministry of Education. (2008). Basic Education. Bangkok: The Agricultural Cooperative Federation of Thailand. Limited. (in Thai)
4. Ministry of Information and Communication Technology. (2007). ICT 2020 Conceptual Framework. Bangkok: Thana & Graphic Press. (in Thai)
5. Office of the National Economics and Social Development Board. (2006). National Economic and Social Development Plan No. 10, (2007-2011). (in Thai)
6. Onthawon, K. & Mungsing, S. (2015). A Development ICT Competency Indicator Model for Faculty Member in Institute of Physical Education–Thailand. Academic Journal Institute of Physical Education, 7(1), 209-221. (in Thai)
7. Silpcharu, T. (2012). Research and Statistical Analysis Using SPSS and AMOS. Nonthaburi: S.R. Printing Mass Products, Co., Ltd. (in Thai)
8. Sukkasem, K. & Prasith-rathsint, S. (2007). Handbook of LISREL applications. Bangkok: Samlada Co., Ltd. (in Thai)
9. UNESCO. (2008). ICT Competency Standards for Teachers. United Kingdom: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
10. Yossiri, W., Rawichart, N., Hayeesani, M., Karaminae, N., Laongpol, J., Vongsvivut, S., et al. (2017). The Study of University Teachers’ Desired Characteristics in English Language Teaching and Learning as Perceived by Yala Rajabhat University Students. Journal of Yala Rajabhat University, 12(Special Issue), 86-99. (in Thai)