Development of Indicators for Organizing Learning Based on Community Context to Ensure the Quality of Education at the Basic Education Level: Confirmatory Factor Analysis

Main Article Content

Panida Dumrongsusakul

บทคัดย่อ

This study aimed to development of indicators for organizing learning based on community context to ensure the quality of education at the basic education level: Confirmatory factor analysis and to test   the goodness-of-fit of the structural equation model of indicators for organizing learning based on community context. The sample consisted of 117 teachers from schools under the jurisdiction of the Pattani Primary Educational Service Area Office 1, selected proportionally based on their subject areas. Data were collected using a 21-item, five-point Likert scale questionnaire. Content validity was verified by five experts, with Item-Objective Congruence (IOC) values ranging from 0.80 to 1.00. The overall instrument demonstrated high reliability, with a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.961. Data analysis employed confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The findings revealed that organizing learning based on community context management comprises four components with a total of 21 indicators: (1) Concrete experience (CE), (2) Reflective observation (RO), (3) Abstract conceptualization (AC) and (4) Active experimentation (AE). The empirical data demonstrated good model fit, as indicated by the following fit indices: X2 = 262.80, df = 186, p < 0.001; GFI = 0.99; AGFI = 0.90; SRMR = 0.07; RMSEA = 0.06; p-value for test of close fit = 0.99; NFI = 0.98; IFI = 0.99; CFI = 0.99. The standardized factor loadings for each indicator ranged from 0.71 to 0.93. Drawing upon the results of this study, the following recommendations are presented to guide further research should be conducted in diverse contexts and with more varied samples and investigate the outcomes of implementing the developed indicators in real educational settings.

Article Details

ประเภทบทความ
บทความวิจัย

เอกสารอ้างอิง

Bedri, S. S., Frein, A. H. & Dowling, D. (2017). Kolb’s experiential learning theory: A meta-synthesis. International Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 23(1), 37-54.

Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.

Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.

Kolb, A. Y. & Kolb, D. A. (2017). The learning styles inventory 4.0: A comprehensive guide to theory, research, and application. Chicago: Experience based learning Systems, Inc.

Office of the Education Council. (2014). Basic education standards for internal quality assurance of educational institutions. Office of the Education Council, Ministry of Education. (in Thai)

Panich, W. (2014). Community-based learning (CBL). Bangkok: Siam Komol Foundation. (in Thai)

Pascual, D. E. F., Saepudin, A., Sadikin, A. & Saripah, I. (2021). Model of Community Learning Center Management in Improving Education Service. Journal of Community Development Research (Humanities and Social Sciences), 14(3), 1–16.

Quality Assurance in Education B.E. 2553 (2010). Ministerial regulation on the educational quality assurance system, criteria, and procedures B.E. 2553 (2010). Government Gazette, Volume 127, Part 23 A, pp. 22-35. (in Thai)

Ritthikup, W. (2018). Community-based learning: An effective learning management strategy for teachers in the 21st century. Graduate School Journal, 11(3), 179-191. (in Thai)

Thongkhao, K. (2018). Community-based learning management to promote lifelong learning of youth in the community. Journal of Graduate Studies Valaya Alongkornrajabhat University under the Royal Patronage, 12(3), 171-182. (in Thai)

Wargenau, A. & Han, J. (2018). Assessing meaningful community engagement: A conceptual model to advance health equity through transformed systems for health. American Journal of Community Psychology, 61(3-4), 317-328.