Teachers' Perspectives and Understandings of STEM Education and STEM Integration Across Disciplines
Main Article Content
Abstract
This qualitative case study aims to explore the perspectives of teachers from four disciplines-Science, Technology, Industrial Arts, and Mathematics-on STEM education and its integration. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, concept map analysis, and document synthesis. The findings propose a conceptual framework illustrating how the nature of each discipline, rooted in teachers’ academic backgrounds, shapes their teaching orientations, which in turn influence their approaches to STEM instruction and determine the level of integration applied in classrooms. The study revealed that science and mathematics teachers tend to adopt structured learning approaches, such as inquiry-based learning and engineering design, perceiving STEM education as a means to foster higher-order thinking skills and systematic problem-solving. This often leads to a sequential multidisciplinary integration. In contrast, technology and industrial arts teachers emphasized hands-on activities and product creation but often lacked theoretical linkage, resulting in parallel integration or discipline-centered approaches. The key finding highlights that understanding teachers’ epistemological foundations in each discipline can guide more targeted and effective professional development. Such awareness enables teachers to reflect on their own pedagogical beliefs, recognize interdisciplinary connections, and design STEM learning experiences that are deeper and more balanced.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice articles, information, images, etc. was published in this Journal of Yala Rajabhat University is a copyright of the journal Yala Rajabhat University. If any person or deparment wants to bring all or part of it for publish or take any action. Authorization is required in written form from the Journal of Yala Rajabhat University only.
References
Dare, E. A., Ellis, J. A. & Roehrig, G. H. (2018). Understanding science teachers' implementations of integrated STEM curricular units through a phenomenological multiple case study. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 1-19.
English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1-8.
Kelley, T. R. & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1-11.
Li, Y., Wang, K., Xiao, Y. & Froyd, J. E. (2020). Research and trends in STEM education: A systematic review of journal publications. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(11), 1-16.
Margot, K. C. & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers' perception of STEM integration and education: a systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(2), 1-16.
Nadelson, L. S. & Seifert, A. L. (2017). Integrated STEM defined: Contexts, challenges, and the future. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(3), 221-223.
Norris, S. (2004). Analyzing multimodal interaction: A methodological framework. London: Routledge.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: CA: Sage Publications.
Ring, E. A., Dare, E. A., Crotty, E. A. & Roehrig, G. H. (2017). The evolution of teacher conceptions of STEM education throughout an intensive professional development experience. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28(5), 444-467.
Shernoff, D. J., Sinha, S., Bressler, D. M. & Ginsburg, L. (2017). Assessing teacher education and professional development needs for the implementation of integrated approaches to STEM education. International journal of STEM education, 4, 1-16.
Vasquez, J. A., Sneider, C. I. & Comer, M. W. (2013). STEM lesson essentials, grades 3-8: Integrating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann
Vichaidit, C. & Faikhamta, C. (2021). Science teachers’ perceptions on pedagogical content knowledge for STEM. Journal of Education and Innovation, 23(2), 152–168. (in Thai)