Comparative Study Theory of Tort with Theory of Strict Liability and Perception for Entrepreneur The Udonthani Chamber of Commerce

Abstract

Tort liability an international issue because when demand for a product, the greater the amount of the production process there is more to the needs of consumers so a deficiency in the production will be more. Thailand is a Member Countries of General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade by The WTO. Thailand has increased of Demand and Production. And defects in manufacturing process because The problematic factors Advanced scientific knowledge and Innovation. Consumers can’t checked the quality of the product So Thailand has Liability for Damages Emerging form Unsafe Product Act B.E. 2551. The objectives of the study were 1) To study the history, concepts and theories of liability against the general principle of strict liability. 2) To compare the primary liability for violation of the general principle of strict liability, and 3) An understanding of entrepreneurship in UdonThani Chamber members about the abuse liability and strict liability principle. By means of Documents research. The educational content of the Tort Liability on general principles of strict liability. The study showed that 1) Tort Liability under the Civil and Commercial Code, if not intentionally or negligently, the act shall not guilty. But the strict liability under unsafe products. Even those who did not intentionally or negligently, it will still be liable if it proves that the damage caused by the product. And also to the principles of the law of witnesses by the burden of proof falls to the operator as well. 2) For the recognition and understanding of the general principles of tort liability rather than strict liability. Because it is a relatively new concept. It should promote the operator is aware of the strict liability. Under the proposal, the product unsafe. To allow operators to prepare.