Effectiveness of Lexical Collocation Instruction on Students’ Collocation Knowledge

Main Article Content

Phasinee Junjoem
Thanyapa Palanukulwong

Abstract

The current study aimed to examine the effectiveness of lexical collocation instruction in enhancing EFL students’ collocation knowledge. The participants in this quasi-experimental study were 30 Mathayom 6 EFL students who were studying in the Science-Mathematic Program at a public high school. The instrument was a collocation test, administered as pre- and post-tests. Fifteen lessons of lexical collocation were taught in thirty hours of Fundamental English course. Descriptive statistics and Dependent Samples of t-test were employed to analyze the data quantitatively for comparing the participants’ performance at the pre-test and post-test. The results showed that the participants’ scores in the post collocation test increased significantly. The participants performed best on verb+noun collocations, but worst on verb +adverb collocations. After collocation instruction, the participants acquired the knowledge of collocations from the instruction. However, some categories of lexical collocations were found to be problematic for participants to acquire in spite of instruction.

Article Details

Section
Research article

References

1.Benson, M., Benson, E. & Ilson, R. (2009). The BBI Combinatory Dictionary of English. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
2.Boonyasaquan, S. (2006). The Lexical Approach: An Emphasis on Collocations [Electronic Version]. Journal of Humanities, 28, 98-108.
3.Hill, J. (2000). Revising Priorities: From Grammatical Failure to Collocational Success. In M. Lewis, Teaching Collocation: Further Developments in the Lexical Approach. London: Language Teaching Publications.
4.Kala, P. (2012). Collocation Instruction to Enhance English Vocabulary Knowledge and Writing Ability among Mathayom Suksa 5 Students [Online]. Retrieved May 19th, 2015, from: http://tdc.thailis.or.th.
5.Lewis, M. (1993). The Lexical Approach: The state of ELT and a way forward. London: Language Teaching Publications.
6.Lewis, M. (1997). Implementing the Lexical Approach: Putting Theory. London: Commmercial Colour Press Plc.
7.Lewis, M. (2000). Teaching Collocation: Further Developments in the Lexical Approach. London: Language Teaching Publications.
8.McCarthy, M. & O’Dell, F. (2005). English Collocations in Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.McIntosh, C. (2009). Oxford Collocations Dictionary for Students of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.Mongkolchai, A. (2008). A Study of University Students’ Ability in Using English Collocations. Master’s Project, M.A. (English). Graduate School, Srinakharinwirot University.
11.Nation, I. S. (2001). Learning Vocabulay in Another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.Ozgul, B. & Abdulkadir, C. (2012). Teaching Vocabulary through Collocations in EFL Classes: The Case of Turkey. International Journal of Research Studeies in Language Learning, 1, 21-32.
13.Phoocharoensil, S. (2013). Cross-linguistic Influence: Its Impact on L2 English Collocation Production. English Language Teaching, 6(1), 1-10
14.Phoocharoensil, S. (2014). Exploring Learners’ Developing L2 Collocational Competence. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(12), 2533-2540.
15.Shooshtari, Z. G. & Karami, N. (2013). Lexical Collocation Instruction and Its Impact on Non-academic EFL Learner’s Speaking Ability. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(4), 767 - 776.
16.Usen, A. (2015). Effectiveness of Teaching Collocations to Primary School Students (Grade 6). 7th International Conference on Humanities and Social Sciences “ASEAN 2015: Challenges and Opportunities”. Songkhla: Faculty of Liberal Arts, Prince of Songkhla University.
17.Wei, Y. (1999). Teaching collocations for productive vocabulary development. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Language. New York.
18.Yumanee, C. & Phoocharoensil, S. (2013). Analysis of Collocational Errors of Thai EFL Students. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 6(1), 90-100.