Key Features of the Coaching and Mentoring Model for Enhancing Pre-service Teachers’ Competencies in Conducting Science Classroom Action Research

Main Article Content

Surayot Supprakob
Janesuk Potisart
Prathan Prachubchok

Abstract

This qualitative research under interpretivist paradigm aims to study and synthesize the critical features of the coaching and mentoring model that enhance pre-service science teachers’ CAR competencies. Semi-structure interview about the coaching and mentoring strategy that success to promote teacher’s CAR competency was administered to eight University lecturers. Inductive analysis in conjunction with content analysis were used. The findings showed that the eight of coaching and mentoring models had something in common. The five critical features consisted of letting teacher face with problem, face to face meeting, just in time support, giving the good example, sharing and contribution. The research findings of this paper provide suggestions for teacher preparation programs and stakeholders to successful support pre-service teachers’ competencies in conducting CAR.

Article Details

Section
Research article

References

Bogdan, R. & Biklen, S. K. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods. (4th ed.). Pearson Education Group, Inc.

Connor, M. & Pokora, J. (2012). Coaching and mentoring at work: Developing effective practice. (2nd ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Faikhamta, C. (2012). Science classroom action research: A critical theory perspective. Kasetsart Educational Review, 27(3), 19-36. (in Thai)

Faikhamta, C., & Clarke, A. (2015). Thai pre-service science teachers engaging action research during their fifth year internship. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 35(2), 259-273.

Faikhamta, C., Jareonsuk, C., Srinakarin, D. & Boriboon, P. (2016). Science classroom action research. Bangkok: Institute of Academic Development (IAD). (in Thai)

Inoue, N. (2015). Beyond actions: Psychology of action research for mindful educational improvement. New York, NY: Peter Lang.

Jantarakantee, E. (2016). Coaching and mentoring system model for developing science teachers’ teaching practices and the ability to conduct classroom action research. Journal of Graduate Studies Valaya Alongkorn Rajabhat University, 10(1), 128-141. (in Thai)

Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R. & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research: Doing critical participatory action research. Singapore: Springer, Sage Publications.

Ketsing, J. (2014). Preservice teachers’ difficulties in teaching inquiry in Thai science classrooms. The International Science Education Conference 2014 (ISEC 2014), November 25-27, 2014. Singapore: National Institute of Education.

Ketsing, J. (2017). Preservice science teachers’ challenges in doing classroom action research and learning activities to cope with the challenges. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(3), 457-469. (in Thai)

Loucks-Horsley, S., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S. Love, N. & Hewson, P. W. (2010). Designing professional development for teacher of science and mathematics. (3rd ed.). Corwin Press.

McNiff, J. & Whitehead, J. (2011). All you need to know about action research. (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.

Nuangchalerm, P. (2018). Action research in teaching. Khon Kaen: Klungnana Vitthaya Press. (in Thai)

Phuaphan, N. (2021). Effects of mentoring model for enhancing competency in teaching and classroom action research for general science student teachers. School of Educational Studies, 14(1), 45-59. (in Thai)

Supprakob. S. (2017). Enhancing beginning chemistry teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for teaching the nature of science through mentoring program. Doctoral Thesis. Kasetsart University.

Vitayacheeva, P. & Noparit, T. (2018). Professional development of higher education instructors through mentoring: A Phenomenological study. Journal of Yala Rajabhat University, 13(1), 47-58. (in Thai)