The Factors Influencing the Success of Teachers' Instructional Management in Promoting Mathematical Thinking among Elementary Students in the Three Southern Border Provinces of Thailand

Main Article Content

Yameelah Suki
Afifi Lateh
Lilla Adulyasas

Abstract

This study aimed to explore instructional strategies that promote mathematical thinking among primary school students and to analyze factors influencing the success of teachers’ instructional practices in fostering mathematical thinking. The research was conducted in two phases. Phase 1 employed a qualitative approach by conducting semi-structured interviews with 15 exemplary mathematics teachers from the three southern border provinces of Thailand. Data were analyzed using content analysis. Phase 2 adopted a quantitative approach, utilizing an online questionnaire developed from the qualitative findings. Data were collected from 390 primary mathematics teachers in the same region, selected through convenience sampling and based on the sufficiency rule for structural equation modeling. The data were analyzed using basic statistics, correlation analysis, and multiple regression analysis via the Enter method. The research findings revealed that instructional approaches to promote mathematical thinking should integrate curriculum development, teacher professional development, student skill enhancement, and administrative support. The factors influencing the success of instructional practices in promoting mathematical thinking consist of five domains: teaching skills, teacher characteristics, support, learners, and curriculum. The adjusted coefficient of determination (R²adj) was 0.542, indicating that these five factors could significantly predict teachers’ instructional success at the 0.05 level. The study also emphasized the necessity of teacher development through job-embedded learning, the promotion of professional learning communities, and the holistic development of learners.

Article Details

Section
Research article

References

Anistyasari, Y., Ekohariadi, E. & Hidayati, S. C. (2022). Enhancing computational thinking through digital storytelling with cospaces edu. JIEET (Journal of Information Engineering and Educational Technology), 6(1), 1-6.

Areeraksakul-Konglok, S. (2020). Development of mathematics teachers' instructional competency through lesson study in primary schools in Nonthaburi Province. STOU Journal of Education, 13(1), 175–190. (in Thai)

Cohen, D. K. & Hill, H. C. (2000). Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California. Teachers College Record, 102(2), 294–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/0161-4681.00057

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Fraivillig, J. (2001). Strategies for advancing children's mathematical thinking. Teaching Children Mathematics, 8(7), 454–459.

Jabthaisong, J. (2023). Future directions of teaching and learning management to enhance students' mathematical competency in basic education during the next decade (2022–2032) (Doctoral dissertation). Srinakharinwirot University. (in Thai)

Khammanee, T. (2014). Teaching science: knowledge for effective learning process management (18th ed.). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press. (in Thai)

Mason, J., Burton, L. & Stacey, K. (2010). Thinking mathematically. Dorchester: Prentice Hall.

Ministry of Education. (2017). Indicators and core curriculum of mathematics learning strand (Revised Edition B.E. 2560) according to the Basic Education Core Curriculum B.E. 2551. Bangkok: Cooperative Promotion Printing House of Thailand Ltd. (in Thai)

Nilsarakhu, A. (2018). An analysis of mathematics curricula for gifted secondary school students in Thailand and Singapore (Master’ s thesis). Chulalongkorn University. (in Thai)

OECD. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.

Office of the Regional Education Commission 7. (2023). Educational performance report. Yala: Office of the Educational Service Area 7. (in Thai)

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Phatthaphon, M. (2014). Instructional management to promote metacognition and learning happiness (2nd ed.). Bangkok: Charansanitwong Printing. (in Thai)

Puncoo, B., Akakul, T. & Warakitkasemsakul, S. (2019). The Scenario of Mathematical Thinking of Prathomsuksa School in The Next Decade. Rajabhat Maha Sarakham University Journal, 13(3), 81–91. (in Thai)

Santos, L. A. & Villar, L. B. (2023). Teacher readiness for the implementation of enhanced K-10 curriculum: Basis for support mechanism program. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), 7(2), 471–477. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2023.7214

Satiti, W. S. & Wulandari, K. (2021). Students' ability to think mathematically in solving PISA mathematics problems content change and relationship. Mathematics Education Journal, 5(1), 1-14.

Schumacker, R. E. & Lomax, R. G. (1996). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Stitute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology. (2020). PISA 2018 report [Online]. Retrieved August 5, 2023, from: https://pisathailand.ipst.ac.th/pisa/reports/2018. (in Thai)

Tiaopphet, W. (2019). Factors influencing and promoting mathematical literacy in the 21st century among Mathayomsuksa 3 students under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office 26. Journal of Educational Measurement, 26(2), 1–17.

Timkhrongtham, O. (2016). Factors influencing 21st-century instructional management of teachers in the Benjaburapha school cluster under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office 2 (Master’s thesis). Ramkhamhaeng University. (in Thai)