Efeects of Learning Fractions Through a Concrete Pictorial Abstract Approach (CPA) with Board Games on Prathomsuksa 3 Students’ Learning Achievement
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aimed to (1) compare students’ math learning achievement on fractions before and after learning through a concrete pictorial abstract approach (CPA) and board games and (2) examine the satisfaction of students with learning through a concrete pictorial abstract approach (CPA) and board games. The sample consisted of 27 Prathomsuksa 3 students at Banneonthong School during the first semester of the academic year 2024, selected through simple random sampling using a lottery method. The research instruments were (1) CPA lesson plans incorporating board games on fractions; (2) a board game about fractions; (3) a math achievement test on fractions; and (4) a satisfaction questionnaire on learning through the CPA approach and board games. Descriptive statistics, including mean scores, standard deviations, and relative growth scores, were used to analyze student learning achievement before and after the intervention. A t-test for dependent samples was used to compare mean scores on the fractions achievement test before and after learning through the CPA approach and board games. Student satisfaction with learning through the CPA approach and board games was analyzed using descriptive statistics, including means and standard deviations.
The findings indicated that 1) Students who studied through the CPA approach and board games had statistically higher learning achievement scores after learning at a significant level of .05 and 2) The satisfaction of students with learning through the CPA approach and board games was ‘high’.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
กระทรวงศึกษาธิการ, พระราชบัญญัติการศึกษาแห่งชาติ พ.ศ. ๒๕๕๒ ฉบับแก้ไขเพิ่มเติม,กรุงเทพมหานคร: สำนักพิมพ์คุรุสภา, ๒๕๕๒.
สำนักงานคณะกรรมการการศึกษาขั้นพื้นฐาน. หลักสูตรแกนกลางการศึกษาขั้นพื้นฐานพุทธศักราช ๒๕๕๑ (ฉบับปรับปรุง พ.ศ. ๒๕๖๐). กรุงเทพมหานคร: โรงพิมพ์ชุมนุมสหกรณ์การเกษตรแห่งประเทศไทย จำกัด, ๒๕๖๐.
ทิพรัตน์ สิทธิวงศ์. “การศึกษาผลของการใช้บอร์ดเกมในการส่งเสริมการเรียนรู้สำหรับนิสิตระดับปริญญาตรี คณะศึกษาศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยนเรศวร”. วารสารศึกษาศาสตร์. ปีที่ ๒๓ ฉบับที่ ๔ (๒๕๖๔) : ๑๙๗ –๑๙๙
Anderson, C. A., & Dill, K. E. “Video games and aggressive thoughts, feelings, and behavior in the laboratory and in life”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol.78 No.4 (2000): 772 – 790.
Bruner, J. S. “Toward a Theory of Instruction”. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1966.
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. “From game design elements to gamefulness:Defining “gamification.” In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference”. Envisioning Future Media Environments, 2011.
Gee, J. P. What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.
Gee, J. P. Good video games and good learning: Collected essays on video games, learning, and literacy. Peter Lang, 2007.
Prensky, M. Digital game-based learning. McGraw-Hill, 2001.
Swan, K. “Collaborative learning and student satisfaction in online learning Environments”. In Elements of quality online education: Engaging communities Sloan Consortium. (2006): pp. 45 – 60.