Hydraulic stability of interlocking modular hexagonal artificial reefs under varying water levels

Authors

  • Haryo Dwito Armono Department of Ocean Engineering, Sepuluh Nopember Institute of Technology, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5215-9764
  • Suwardi Denpasar Marine Management Center, Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries, Indonesia
  • Dendy Satrio Department of Ocean Engineering, Sepuluh Nopember Institute of Technology, Indonesia
  • Wahyudi Department of Ocean Engineering, Sepuluh Nopember Institute of Technology, Indonesia
  • Ahmad Qaedi Luthfi Department of Ocean Engineering, Sepuluh Nopember Institute of Technology, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33175/mtr.2027.289775

Keywords:

Artificial reef; Hydraulic stability; Interlocking; Modular reef; Physical model test

Abstract

Artificial reefs are increasingly used as submerged coastal protection structures. However, their performance may be compromised when individual units slide, roll, scatter, or progressively displace under wave loads. Although geometric interlocking is often assumed to enhance modular reef stability, its influence on stability response under varying water levels and wave conditions remains insufficiently quantified. This study experimentally evaluates the hydraulic stability of new Interlocking Modular Hexagonal Artificial Reefs (IMHAR) using physical model tests in a wave flume. The interlocking and non-interlocking arrays are tested at a 1:15 Froude scale using seven multilayer configurations, three water levels (Low Water Spring (LWS), Mean Sea Level (MSL), and High Water Spring (HWS)), and three paired significant wave height and period cases. Stability is assessed using visual unit-state classification, percentage stability and damage, interlocking-induced stability gain, and a dimensionless stability number framework. The results show that interlocking units consistently improves stability, particularly under high-wave and low-water conditions. Under the LWS in the highest wave case, the interlocking arrays retain 50.0 - 86.4 % stability, whereas the non-interlocking arrays decrease to 20.0 - 53.0 %. The 731-GR (seven-base pointy-side) group configuration shows the most robust response among the tested layouts, whereas the 631-SL (six-base flat-side) single configuration is the most vulnerable. These findings indicate that, under the tested laboratory conditions, interlocking acts not only as a geometric modification but also as a collective stability mechanism that preserves array compactness and delays unit mobilization. This study provides a stability-oriented experimental basis for designing the placement of modular submerged artificial reefs for coastal protection.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cite this article:

APA Style:
Armono, H. D., Suwardi, Satrio, D., Wahyudi, & Luthfi, A. Q. (2027). Hydraulic stability of interlocking modular hexagonal artificial reefs under varying water levels. Maritime Technology and Research, 9(1), 289775. https://doi.org/10.33175/mtr.2027.289775

 

MDPI Style:
Armono, H. D.; Suwardi; Satrio, D.; Wahyudi; Luthfi, A. Q. Hydraulic stability of interlocking modular hexagonal artificial reefs under varying water levels. Marit. Technol. Res. 2027, 9, 289775. https://doi.org/10.33175/mtr.2027.289775

 

Vancouver Style:
Armono HD, Suwardi, Satrio D, Wahyudi, Luthfi AQ. (2027). Hydraulic stability of interlocking modular hexagonal artificial reefs under varying water levels. Marit. Technol. Res. 9(1):289775. https://doi.org/10.33175/mtr.2027.289775

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Highlights

  • Non-interlocking and new interlocking hexagonal reef modules were tested in a wave flume.
  • The LWS with high waves produced the worst stability of hexagonal reef modules.
  • Stability was configuration-dependent; 731-GR was most stable and 631-SL least stable.
  • Interlocking units enhanced system resistance by maintaining compactness and limiting motion.
  • Crown locks restricted movement and maintained stability of the multilayer reef.

References

Armono, H. D., Winarto, A., Sujantoko, & Ketut, S. I. (2021). A laboratory study on wave transmission over hexagonal artificial reef. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 799(1), 012011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/799/1/012011

Armono, H. D., & Wirayuhanto, H. (2018). Experimental study of scouring characteristics around a hexagonal artificial reef. MATEC Web of Conferences, 177, 01009. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201817701009

CIRIA, CUR, & CETMEF. (2007). The rock manual. The use of rock in hydraulic engineering. Ciria.

Dassanayake, D. T., & Oumeraci, H. (2012). Engineering properties of geotextile sand containers and their effect on hydraulic stability and damage development of low-crested / submerged structures. International Journal of Ocean and Climate Systems, 3(3), 135-150. https://doi.org/10.1260/1759-3131.3.3.135

Dinu, I., Gràcia, V., García-León, M., Lin-Ye, J., Stănică, A., & Sánchez-Arcilla, A. (2025). Feasibility of artificial reefs as coastal protection measures at the Danube Delta coast, Romania. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 13, 1568364. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2025.1568364

Eldrup, M. R., Andersen, T. L., & Burcharth, H. F. (2019). Stability of rubble mound breakwaters: A study of the notional permeability factor, based on physical model tests. Water, 11(5), 934. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11050934

Elias, T., Shirlal, K. G., & E.V., K. (2021). Physical model studies on damage and stability analysis of breakwaters armoured with geotextile sand containers. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 49(3), 604-618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2020.12.001

Ghiasian, M., Carrick, J., Rhode-Barbarigos, L., Haus, B., Baker, A. C., & Lirman, D. (2021). Dissipation of wave energy by a hybrid artificial reef in a wave simulator: Implications for coastal resilience and shoreline protection. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods, 19(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/lom3.10400

Hanif, M. R., & Armono, H. D. (2022). Analisis stabilitas artificial reefs tipe hexagonal. Rekayasa, 15(2), 192-198. https://doi.org/10.21107/rekayasa.v15i2.15246

Huang, J., Lowe, R. J., Ghisalberti, M., & Hansen, J. E. (2024). Wave transformation across impermeable and porous artificial reefs. Coastal Engineering, 189, 104488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2024.104488

Huang, J., Lowe, R. J., Ghisalberti, M., & Hansen, J. E. (2025). Wave dissipation induced by flow interactions with porous artificial reefs. Coastal Engineering, 197, 104688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2024.104688

Hughes, S. A. (1993). Physical models and laboratory techniques in coastal engineering. World Scientific.

Kuang, C., Ma, Y., Han, X., Pan, S., & Zhu, L. (2020). Experimental observation on beach evolution process with presence of artificial submerged sand bar and reef. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 8(12), 1019. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8121019

Norris, B. K., Reguero, B. G., Bartolai, J., Yukish, M. A., Rhode-Barbarigos, L., Haus, B. K., Ojeda, G. B., Maza, M., Lara, J. L., & Beck, M. W. (2025). Designing modular, artificial reefs for both coastal defense and coral restoration. Coastal Engineering, 199, 104742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2025.104742

Peng, M., Zhang, J., Zhu, Y., Gao, L., Li, S., & Pan, X. (2024). Experimental study on wave attenuation and stability of ecological dike system composed of submerged breakwater, mangrove, and dike under storm surge. Applied Ocean Research, 151, 104144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2024.104144

Ramm, L. AW., Florisson, J. H., Watts, S. L., Becker, A., & Tweedley, J. R. (2021). Artificial reefs in the Anthropocene: A review of geographical and historical trends in their design, purpose, and monitoring. Bulletin of Marine Science, 97(4), 699-728. https://doi.org/10.5343/bms.2020.0046

Recio, J., & Oumeraci, H. (2007). Effect of deformations on the hydraulic stability of coastal structures made of geotextile sand containers. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 25(4-5), 278-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2007.02.006

Recio, J., & Oumeraci, H. (2009). Process based stability formulae for coastal structures made of geotextile sand containers. Coastal Engineering, 56(5-6), 632-658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2009.01.011

Suwardi, Armono, H. D., Satrio, D., Tiffany, V. K., Prakoso, A., Putro, F. L., Hanif, M. R., Erlangga, R., Khaydar, D. M., Karim, A. K., & Aswin, J. A. (2026). Artificial reefs for coastal wetland and estuary protection and coral restoration: A review. Maritime Technology and Research, 8(1), 281096. https://doi.org/10.33175/mtr.2026.281096

Downloads

Published

2026-10-23

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.