Creative Leadership of School Administrators Affecting Teachers' Abilities to Develop a Learning Management Innovation in the Narathiwat Primary Educational Service Area Office 1
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objectives of this research were to determine 1) the level of creative leadership of school administrators, 2) the level of teachers' abilities to develop a learning management innovation, 3) the relationship between the creative leadership of school administrators and the teachers' abilities to develop a learning management innovation, and 4) the predictive variables of creative leadership of school administrators that affect teachers' abilities to develop a learning management. The sample of this study included school directors, head teachers of academic affairs, and teachers who currently developed learning management innovations, a total of 327 informants. The unit of this study was at the school level. By using the Yamane formula, 109 schools became sample sites. The research instrument was a five–level rating scale questionnaire with a reliability of 0.986. The data were analyzed using mean, percentage, standard deviation, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and multiple regression analysis.
The results showed that 1) the creative leadership of the school administrators was at a high level (M = 4.38, SD = .478), that 2) the teacher's ability to develop learning management innovations was at a high level (M = 4.20, SD = .478), that 3) the creative leadership of the school administrators was positively correlated with the teachers’ ability to develop learning management innovations at a relatively high level (rX,Y = .626) with a statistically significant level at the .01, and that 4) the creative leadership of school administrators affected teachers' learning management innovation development ability. There were only two predictive variables: 'flexibility in adaptation' was the best predictor with statistical significance at the .01 level, followed by 'vision for change with statistical significance at the .05 level, which predicted teachers' ability to develop innovative learning management.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Journal of Information and Learning is operated by the Office of Academic Resources, Prince of Songkla University. All articles published in the journal are protected by Thailand copyright law. This copyright covers the exclusive rights to share, reproduce and distribute the article, including in electronic forms, reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, or similar. Authors own copyrights in the works they have created as well as the Office of Academic Resources. The Journal reserves the right to edit the language of papers accepted for publication for clarity and correctness, as well as to make formal changes to ensure compliance with the journal's guidelines. All authors must take public responsibility for the content of their paper.
References
Aiemphaya, K., Noymanee, N., Anukulwech, A., & Raso, D. (2020). Management of education in globalization. Journal of Education MCU, 8(1), 332-360.
Ash, R., & Persall, M. (2007). The principal as chief learning officer, the new work of formative leadership. Stamford University Birmingham.
Boonchuay, N., Jun-eam, P., & Pinyoanantapong, B. (2012). Strategic plan for developing appropri-ate creative leadership for school administrators. Journal Valaya Alongkorn Rajabhat University under the Royal Patronage, 6(3),155-166.
Chaleoykitti, S., Kamprow, P., & Promdet, S. (2019). Patient safety and quality of nursing service. Journal of The Royal Thai Army Nurses, 15(2), 66-70.
Chusriwat, S. (2019). Creative leadership of educational Institution administrators affecting effec-tiveness of schools under Kalasin elementary educational service area office district 1. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Nakhon Phanom University, 5(3), 53-61
Damsab, Y., Buddhicheewin, N., & Dhammasaccakarn, W. (2019). Leadership development of school administrators in the context of a multicultural society. Journal of Education Studies, 47(1), 272-293.
Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health. (2021, September 20). Coronavirus dis-ease 2019 (COVID-19). Department of Disease Control. https://ddc.moph.go.th/viralpneumonia/int_protection.php
Kaewhan, T., & Koomkhinam, T. (2021). Creative leadership of educational Institution administra-tors affecting competency of teachers under Nong Khai secondary education service area office. Journal of Modern Learning Development, 6(4), 164-175.
Khamanee, K. (2001). Thinking science. Academic Quality Development Institute
Mathuros, S. (2021). Management education online in the new normal COVID-19. Rajapark Jour-nal, 15(40), 33-42.
Mungkasem, U. (2000). Good public and social affairs administration. Civil service development institute.
Narathiwat Primary Educational Service Area Office District 1. (2021). Basic information under aca-demic year 2021. Narathiwat Primary Educational Service Area Office District 1.
Office of the Rajabhat Institute Council. (2001). Learning documents accompanying educational innovation courses. Office of the Rajabhat Institute Council.
Patiphan, K., Podaphon, C., & Sereewat, W. (2013). Creative leadership. Klang Nana Wittaya Print-ing House.
Phusara, K., Manphdung, N., & Montaisong, T. (2019). The relationship between creative leadership of school administrators and effectiveness of schools under the supervision of Phranakhon Si Ayutthaya primary education service area office 1. Journal of Management Science Review, 21(2), 51-60.
Prayatsap, P. (2014). The role of educational institution administrators affecting the development of learners' characteristics to become an international standard school under the Office of Sec-ondary Education Service Area 14 Pathum Thani Province [Master of Education Thesis, Rajamanga-la University of Technology Thanyaburi]. DSpace JSPUI. http://www.repository.rmutt.ac.th/dspace/handle/123456789/2523
Ritcharoon, P. (2016). Research techniques for learning development. Chulalongkorn University.
Sinlarat, P. (2010). Strategies for driving innovation in the transition of "Sattasila" education to schools. Chulalongkorn University.
Sittisomboon, M. (2016, September 20). Educational innovation development. ACADEMIA. https://www.academia.edu/23644340
Srisa-ard, B. (2017). Basic research. Suweeriyasan.
Srisaat, B. (2004). Statistical methods for research (4th ed.). Suwiriyasas.
Suesut, J., Buranachart, S., Umnueyrat, S., & Gunma, N. (2021). Creative leadership characteristics of secondary school administrators affecting to the effectiveness of northern secondary schools under the office of the basic education commission. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences University of Phayao, 9(2), 1-22.
Suthirat, C. (2009). Innovation of learning management that focuses on learners. Danex Inter Cor-poration.
Suwannasri, T., & Piampuechana, N. (2021). Creative leadership of educational Institution adminis-trators affecting the effectiveness of educational Institutions. Under vocational education, Maha Sarakham Province. Journal of Mahamakut Wittayalai University Roi Et Campus, 10(1), 742-755.
Thaweerat, P. (1997). Research methods in behavioral sciences and social sciences. Bureau of Educational and Psychological Testing Srinakharinwirot University.
Vejyalak, N. (2018). Principles of learning management. Chulalongkorn University.
Yamane, T. (1973). Statistics: An introductory analysis (3rd ed.). Harper and Row Publication.
