Ketchup Format of Opinion Expressions in the Ketchup Application
Main Article Content
Abstract
The research aimed to examine the forms of opinion expressions used by commenters intended to communicate to artists in the Ketchup application. This study employed a qualitative research approach. The data were analyzed using descriptive analysis of 1,950 fan comments regarding the band BUS, following the multi-media discourse model developed by Kress & van Leeuwen (2006), along with an analysis of three component types: text, emojis, and stickers.
The findings revealed that the forms of opinion expressions found in the Ketchup application could be classified into six categories: 1) opinion expressions in verbal text, 2) verbal text combined with emojis, 3) stickers, 4) verbal text combined with stickers, 5) verbal text combined with emojis and stickers, and 6) emojis. The most common forms of expressing opinions are those with sub-characteristics such as repetition of final consonants, repetition of vowels, word clipping, and the creation of specific word forms to emphasize emotions. The use of verbal text reflected the commenters’ intention to communicate feelings, admiration, and a sense of closeness to the artists clearly. Meanwhile, the use of emojis and stickers helped reinforce the meanings and emotional tones of the messages. The study also found that simple sentences were used most frequently, as they enabled concise communication and reduced complexity in conveying meaning. This research highlights the dynamics of the Thai language in digital media contexts and provides a basis for comparative studies of opinion expression forms in other types of online media
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Chantarasirirat, R. & Sriprasert, A. (2025). The use of emojis in written ELF communication through social network sites by Thai and non-Thai communicators. Asia Social Issues, 18(6),e280999. https://doi.org/10.48048/asi.2025.280999 (in Thai)
Chookaew, A. (2019). Thai LINE Sticker: Meangs and Functions in Communication (Master of Arts in Thai Language, Thammasat University). (in Thai)
Crystal, D. (2006). Language and the Internet (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Jaturapat, T. (2021). Multimodal discourse analysis of gender ideology in television food product advertisements in Thailand (Master's Thesis, Chiang Mai University). (in Thai)
Kanchanaparamapa, C. & Panyapiroje, P. (2024). Korean Musical Artists’ Branding through Thai Fans’ Online Communities. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (HUSOKKU), 41(2), 58–81. (in Thai)
Kanchanawan, N. (2004). Panha kanchai phasa Thai. Ramkhamhaeng University Press. (in Thai)
Kress, G. & Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (2nd ed.). Routledge Falmer.
Nimkatawut, R. (2022). Enhancing Grade 1 Students' Adversity Quotient through Textbook and Learning Multimedia: A Multimodal Discourse Analysis (Master's Thesis, Chulalongkorn University). (in Thai)
Panyametheekul, S. (2015). Language & the Internet. Print Corner. (in Thai)
Phithak, T., Surasangprasert, P. & Kamollimsakul, S. (2023). Going beyond chat: Designing connotative meaningful Line stickers to promote road safety in Thailand through participatory design. Safety, 9(4), 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety9040087. (in Thai)
Saralumba, C. (2001). Language use in “Chatroom”. Journal of Liberal Arts, Thammasat University 1(1), 77–92. (in Thai)
Sirichompoo, S. & Chaiyasuk, I. (2024). Factors Influencing Undergraduate Students’ Use of Emojis in Facebook Messenger Communication. Journal of Man and Society, 10(2), 131–152. (in Thai)
Sirikaya, S. & Sriphech, S. (2018). The Usage of Codes LINE Stickers for Interpersonal Communication. Journal of Siam Communication Arts Review, 17(22), 97–105. (in Thai)
Suksawat, S. (2015). Language and pragmatic strategies used on Korkwamdondon Facebook fanpage (Master's Thesis, Chiang Mai University). (in Thai)
Zappavigna, M. & Logi, L. (2021). Emoji in social media discourse about working from home. Discourse, Context & Media, 44, 100543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100543