The Development of a Learning Management Model to Promote Reconciliation in Multicultural Society in being Professional Teachers Course, Bachelor of Education Student at Hatyai University
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The aims of this research were to: develop and study the achievement in using the management model to promote reconciliation in multicultural society in being professional teacher course for Bachelor of education student at Hatyai university, The research sample consisted of 60 students in the 1/2017 semester. The sample was acquired by cluster random sampling. The instruments used in this study were: lesson plan to promote reconciliation in Multicultural Society, evaluation form of reconciliation, the achievement test and the attitude test on the teaching style. The statistics used were mean, standard deviation and t-test. The findings found that, the learning management model comprised of five major components: principles of the model, objectives of the model, teaching process, the content of the learning, and measurement and evaluation. Evaluation results were at the most appropriate level. The results of using the learning management model to promote reconciliation in multicultural society were found: the achievement of experimental students in the multicultural society were at a good level. The experimental group had higher learning achievement after learning management than before learning. Statistically significant at the .05 level. The experimental group had learning achievement in professional teaching course higher than normal students.
Article Details
Copyright Notice articles, information, images, etc. was published in this Journal of Yala Rajabhat University is a copyright of the journal Yala Rajabhat University. If any person or deparment wants to bring all or part of it for publish or take any action. Authorization is required in written form from the Journal of Yala Rajabhat University only.
References
2. Bruner, J. (1963). Going beyond the information given. New York: Norton.
3. Duffy, T. M. (1996). Constructivism: Implication for the design and delivery of instruction. In Handbook of research for educational communications and technology. New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
4. Dick, W., Carey, L. & Carey, J. O. (2001). The systematic design of instruction. (5 ed.). New York: Pearson Education.
5. Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (1987). Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book.
6. Joyce, B., Weil, M. & Calhoun, E. (2004). Model of Teaching. (7 ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
7. Palasai, C. (2009). Development of a quality Higher Education system in the Three Southern Border Provinces of Thailand: utilizing Princess of Naradhiwas University’s Development Strategies. Journal of Princess of Naradhiwas University. 1(1), 1-20. (in Thai)
8. Pranee, C. (2009). Research Report Learning Management Model to Enhance Reconciliation of Thai youth: Nakhon Sawan: Faculty of Education, Nakhon Sawan Rajabhat University Nakhon Sawan: Faculty of Education, Nakhon Sawan Rajabhat University.
9. Pengjan, S. (2017). Project Design Learning to Learners’ Participations. Journal of Yala Rajabhat University, 12(2), 47-59. (in Thai)
10. Rascha, T. (2013). A Model of Developing Reconciliation Thinking for the Student Teachers at Prince of Songkla University. Doctor of Philosophy Thesis in Curriculum and Instruction, Graduate School, Khon Kaen University.
11. Southern Border Provinces Administration Centre. (2007). Strategic Understanding, Developmental Access. Yala: Southern Border Provinces Administration Centre, Yala.
12. Yongyuan, B. (2010). Research Report Multicultural education management model National Institute for Child and Family Development, Mahidol University Bangkok: National Culture Commission, Ministry of Culture. (in Thai)
13. Puttawattana, P. (2007). The role of education for sustainable development in Southern Border Provinces. Journal of Foculty of Education, Prince of Songkla University Pattani, 18(2). 113-136. (in Thai).
