The Study Attributes of Capability to Critically Use Technological Creativity of the Upper Secondary School Students
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In the upper secondary school, students are only the technological user which means using it for entertainment rather than searching for knowledge. Therefore, students lack of ability to use technology to create knowledge creatively including a lack of discretion in using technology for searching for knowledge. The objective was to study attributes of capability to critically use technological creativity of the upper secondary school students by documentary research and in-depth interviews with the professors of educational technology and the teachers in the upper secondary school by using the purposive selection method. There were 10 key informants in total. Content analysis techniques on interpretation of analytic induction was used for analyzing data.The study indicated that the capability to critically use technological creativity of the upper secondary school students were 3 elements which consisted of; Element 1: the capability of thinking indicated that using technology for building knowledge, cogitating for use technology, and adapting knowledge. Element 2: the capability of practice indicated that working step by step, choosing technology appropriately, analyzing and synthesizing process for work, and working and sharing with other people. Element 3: the capability of developing personality indicated that observant and curios, attempt, listening to other opinions, respecting, and ethic in using technology. The results of the study can be used as a guide for learning management in order to enhance the capability about the use of critically technological creativity. Moreover, it can be used to develop tools for assessing the capability about the use of critically technological creativity of the upper secondary school students.
Article Details
Copyright Notice articles, information, images, etc. was published in this Journal of Yala Rajabhat University is a copyright of the journal Yala Rajabhat University. If any person or deparment wants to bring all or part of it for publish or take any action. Authorization is required in written form from the Journal of Yala Rajabhat University only.
References
Asarat, C., Sihamongkhon, Y. & Poolpholamnuay, W. (2014). The development of key core competency indicators in ability to use technology of The Basic Education Core Curriculum 2008 for High School Students. Journal of Educational Measurement Mahasarakham University, 20(1), 57-62. (in Thai)
Chaimarun, S. & Pankham, S. (2017). Confirmatory factor analysis of competency information communication and technology for High School’s Student in the Secondary Educational Service Area Office 2. The 9th National & International Conference, March 20, 2018 Bangkok: Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University. (in Thai)
Charoenwanit, S. (2017). Cyber bullying: Impacts and preventions in adolescents. Journal of Science and Technology, 25(4), 639-648. (in Thai)
Dankongrak, C. (2018). Development of teaching creative thinking skills. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Printing Office
Doyle, A. (2018). List of information technology (IT) skills. In the balance [Online]. Retrieved April 14, 2018, from: https://www.thebalance.com/list-of-information-technology-it-skills-2062410.
Joll, K. (2017). Technology killing creativity?. In Hello Rindle [Online]. Retrieved. December 11, 2017, from: https://hello.rindle.com/is-technology-killing-creativity/.
Joungtrakul J. (2018). Sample size and sampling issues in qualitative research. Journal of Business Administration and Social Sciences Ramkhamhaeng University, 1(2), 1-21. (In Thai).
Kueakun, R. (2016). The development of indicators for technology using the characteristics of high school students in a world class standard school of Secondary Educational Service Areas Office Two. Master’s Thesis. Srinakharinwirot University. (in Thai)
Kwon, H. & Ryu, C. (2017). Model of technological creativity based on the perceptions of technology-related experts. Condition and Situation of International Technology Education, 55(5), 115-123.
Lila, Y. (2015). Section 15 professional ethics and computer law. Basic Computers, Book 2: Units 8-15. Nonthaburi: Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University. (in Thai)
Navarrete, C.C. (2013). Creative thinking in digital game design and development: A case study. Computer & Education, 69, 320-331.
November, A. (2010). Chapter 12 technology rich, information poor. In 21st century skills: Rethinking how student learn. Bloomington: IN. Solution Tree Press.
Office of the National Economic and Social Development Board, Office of the Prime Minister. (2016). National economic and social development plan twelve editions 2017-2021. Bangkok: Office.(in Thai)
Office of the Permanent Secretary for Education Ministry of Education. (2016). The educational development plan of the ministry of education, No. 12 (2017-2021). Bangkok: Office. (in Thai)
Potjaphimon, P., Jamjuree, D., Boonprakob, M. & Tangcharoen, W. (2015). The study of guidelines to enhance critical creative thinking for design students. Journal of Research and Curriculum Development, 5(1), 79-97. (in Thai)
Samoh, N., Boonmongkon, P., Ojanen, T. T., Samakkeekarom, R. & Guadamuz, T. E. (2014). Youth perceptions on cyberbullying. Journal of Behavioral Science for Development. 6(1), 351-363. (in Thai)
Satell, G. (2014). How technology enhances creativity. In Forbes [Online]. Retrieved December 8, 2017, from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/gregsatell/2014/01/27/how-technology-enhances-creativity/#5da390b03f50.
Somabut, A. (2012) Development of learning innovation diffusion model: Case study constructivist learning innovation. Dissertation. Khon Kaen University. (in Thai)
The Secretariat of the Council of Education (2017). National Education Plan 2017-2036. Bangkok: Prikwan Company Limited graphics. (in Thai)
Wongyai, W. & Patpol, M. (2013). From core curriculum to school curriculum: New paradigm of development. Bangkok: Charan Sanitwong, printing. (in Thai)
