Mutilevel Causal Relationships of Organizational Effectiveness for Universities in Cambodia
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objectives of this research were: (1) to develop a public organizational effectiveness measurement model for Universities in Cambodia , and (2) to study multilevel causal factors influencing public organizational effectiveness for Universities in Cambodia at individual and discipline levels.A total of samples were randomly stratified for 400 students. The instrument used was a questionnaire of organizational effectiveness. Statistical analyses were made based on descriptive statistics and Multilevel Structural Equation Model. The results were as follows: (1) The proposed multilevel causal model of public organizational effectiveness for Universities in Cambodia fitted well with the empirical data ; and (2) The model of public organizational effectiveness for Universities in terms of students’ perceptions indicated that for both levels, all variables were important for representing the effectiveness. At the individual level, the most important variable was the student personality development while, at the discipline level, the most important variable was the staff employment satisfaction. However, organizational health was less important at both levels
Article Details
Copyright Notice articles, information, images, etc. was published in this Journal of Yala Rajabhat University is a copyright of the journal Yala Rajabhat University. If any person or deparment wants to bring all or part of it for publish or take any action. Authorization is required in written form from the Journal of Yala Rajabhat University only.
References
2. Cameron, K.S. (1986). A study of organizational effectiveness and its predictors. Management Science, 32(1), 87-112.
3. Gibson, J. L., Ivancevich, J. M. & Donnelly, J. H. (2000). Organizations: behavior, structure, processes. (10th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
4. Goodman, P. S. & Pennings, J. M. (1980). Critical issues in assessing organizational effectiveness. In Lanler, E. E., & Seashore, S. E. (eds.). Organizational assessment perspective on the measurement of organizational behavior and the quality of work life. New York: John Wiley & Son.
5. Harrison, M. I. (1994). Diagnosing organizations methods, models and process. London: Sage Publications.
6. Katz, D. & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations. (2nded.). New York: John Wiley & Son.
7. Kao-ian, J. (2018). The development of model for administrative good governance of administrators in islamic private schools in multicultural society. Journal of Yala Rajabhat University, 13(1), 27-40. (in Thai)
8. Makmee, P. (2016). Multilevel structural equation model of universities effectiveness in Thailand. ASEAN Journal of Management & Innovation, 3(1), 43 -53.
9. Muthén, L. K. & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus: The comprehensive modeling program for applied researchers user’s guide, Version 7.00. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
10. Price, J. L. & Mueller, C. W. (1986). Handbook of organizational measurement. Massachusetts: Pitman.
11. Steers, R. M. (1977). The organizational effectiveness: a behavioral view. Santa Monica: Goodyear Publishing.
