The Factors Affecting the Sustainability Disclosure of Companies Listed on The Stock Exchange of Thailand
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purposes of this research are (1) to analyze the influence of company characteristics affecting the disclosure of sustainability reports and overall business value of companies listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand; (2) to analyze the influence of company characteristics that effect on the disclosure of sustainability reports and annual business value of companies listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand. The researcher applied three research methodologies, documentary research method. quantitative research and qualitative research, collected data from the listed companies' annual reports form 56-1 from 2016-2020, using a record form. The population and sample consisted of 263 companies from listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand. Data analysis and hypothesis testing were performed using multiple regression analysis methods. and in-depth interviews key informant 6 persons from unit of analysis 263 companies by interview form, data analysis uses content analysis.
The results showed that; Company characteristics consist of shareholder structure, company size, shareholder ratio and the proportion of independent committees influences sustainability report disclosure; company size and shareholder structure influences economic and social sustainability report disclosure. And the proportion of shareholders influences the disclosure of social sustainability reporting and environment. The shareholder structure influences business value by measuring. It from an external perspective. (Price-to-Earnings-Per-Share Ratio) Shareholders' equity influences business value by measuring it from an internal perspective. (Return on Equity) and the disclosure of economic and environmental sustainability reporting had a statistically significant effect on business value at 0.05 level.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
นงลักษณ์ วิรัชชัย. หลักการและวิธีการออกแบบการวิจัยเชิงปริมาณ. กรุงเทพมหานคร: เอกสารประกอบการฝึกอบรม สถาบันวิจัยและพัฒนา มหาวิทยาลัยสุโขทัยธรรมาธิราช, ๒๕๕๑.
ลัดดาวัลย์ เพชรโรจน์. เทคนิคการออกแบบการวิจัย. กรุงเทพมหานคร: เอกสารประกอบการฝึกอบรม สถาบันวิจัยและพัฒนา มหาวิทยาลัยสุโขทัยธรรมาธิราช, ๒๕๕๑.
วลัยทิพย์ สาชลวิจารณ์. เทคนิคการออกแบบการวิจัยเชิงคุณภาพ. กรุงเทพมหานคร: เอกสารประกอบการฝึกอบรม สถาบันวิจัยและพัฒนา มหาวิทยาลัยสุโขทัยธรรมาธิราช, ๒๕๕๑.
ศิลปพร ศรจั่นเพชร. “ทฤษฎีบรรษัทภิบาล”. วารสารบริหารธุรกิจ. ปีที่ ๓๑ ฉบับที่ ๑๒๐ (ตุลาคม-ธันวาคม ๒๕๕๑) : ๒-๔.
Adelopo, I. “Voluntary Disclosure Practices among Listed Company in Nigeria. Advances in Accounting”. Incorporating Advances in International Accounting. Vol 27 (2011) : 338-345.
Chan, Z.C.Y., Fung, Y.I. & Chien, W.T. “Bracketing in Phenomenology: Only Undertaken in the Data Collection and Analysis Process”. The Qualitative Report. Vol. 18 No. 30 (2013).
Chen, J.C. & Roberts, R.W. “Toward a More Coherent Understanding of the Organisation-Society Relationship: A Theoretical Consideration for Social and Environmental Accounting Research”. Journal of Business Ethics. Vol. 97 (2010) : 651-665.
Christensen, L.B., Johnson, R.B. & Turner, L.A. Research Methods. Design and Analysis. 12th Edition. (2014).
Cohen, J. R., Holder, L.L., Nath, W.N. & Wood, D. “Corporate Reporting of Nonfinancial Leading Indicators of Economic Performance and Sustainability”. Accounting Horizons. Vol. 26 No. 1 (June 2011) : 65-90.
Dillard, J., Brown, D., & Marshall, S. “An Environmentally Enlightened Accounting”. Accounting Forum. Vol. 29 (2005) : 77-101.
Gamerschlag, R., Moller, K. & Verbeeten, F.H.M. “Determinants of voluntary CSR disclosure: Empirical evidence from Germany”. Review of Managerial Science. Vol. 5 No. 2 (July 2010) : 233-262.
Hackston, D. & Milne, M. J. “Some Determinants of Social and Environmental Disclosures in New Zealand Companies”. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal. Vol. 9 No. 1 (1996) : 77-108.
Haniffa, R. & Cooke, T. “The Impact of Culture and Governance on Corporate Social Reporting”. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy. Vol. 24 No. 1 (2005) : 391–430.
Herzig, C. & Schaltegger, S. Corporate Sustainability Reporting. In Sustainability Communication. 151-169. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. [Online]. Available https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1697-1_14. (2011).
Marshall, C. & Rossman, G.B. “Designing Qualitative Research”. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. Vol. 9 No. 3 (2008) : 101-107.
Mc-Colgan Patrick. Agency Theory and Corporate Governance: A Review of the Literature from a UK. Perspective. [Online]. Available https://accfinweb.account.strath.ac.uk/wps/ journal.pdf (10 June 2008).
Skinner D. J. “Should Firms Disclosure Everything: A Discussion of Open vs. Closed Conference Calls: The Determinants and Effects of Broadening Access to Disclosure”. Journal of Accounting and Economics. Vol. 34 No. 1-3 (2003) : 181-187.
Weber, M. “The Business Case for /corporate Social Responsibility: A Company Level Measurement Approach for CSR”. European Management Journal. Vol. 26 No. 4 (2008): 247-261.
Wilmshurst, T. & Frost, G. “The Role of Accounting and the Accountant in the Environmental Management System”. Business Strategy and the Environment. Vol. 10 No. 3 (May 2001) : 135-147.
Zarzeski, M. T. & Robb S. “Counting More Than Number”. Accountancy Journal. Vol. 128 No. 1 (2001) : 114-116.