An An Educational Management Model to Reinforce the Quality of Students for School Administrators Under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office Bangkok

Abstract

          The purposes of this research were as follows : (1) to study the components of an Educational Management  to Reinforce the Quality of Students for School Administrators Under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office Bangkok, (2) to create an of the An Educational Management Model to Reinforce the Quality of Students for School Administrators Under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office  Bangkok, and (3) to evaluate and affirm the of An Educational Management Model to Reinforce the Quality of Students for School Administrators Under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office Bangkok. The mixed methods research was used in the study. The research instruments were semi-structured interviews, questionnaires and confirmation or certification forms through 5-rating scale questionnaires by IOC; 0.6-1.0 discriminatory power equal to 0.33-0.89 with reliability at 0.986, informants consisting of school directors, vice-directors, and teachers in 92 schools. The analyzed by frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, and confirmatory factor analysis.

            The results of this research was found that : (1) The components of an Educational Management to Reinforce the Quality of Students for School Administrators Under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office Bangkok, general education department consist of 15 components and 86 variables. (2) The an Educational Management Model to Reinforce the Quality of Students for School Administrators Under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office Bangkok, general education department from confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated that the highest value was on (1) Student Quality Management Process (2) Promote the quality of learners (3) Quality Development of Learners and (4) Control the quality of learners. has a chi-square value = 2.466, DF = 4, P-value = .651, GFI = .999, AGFI = .973, and RMSER = .000. This result indicates that the model is consistent with the empirical data. (3) The evaluation and confirmation of the model from experts in its propriety, accuracy, feasibility, and utility is at 4.62 ( = 4.62), higher than the set criteria at  = 3.51. That means the model is approved.