Maritime decarbonization of shipping and ports: A system-oriented review of coordination, sequencing, and transition pathways
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33175/mtr.2027.289792Keywords:
Alternative marine fuels; Bibliometric analysis; Energy transition; Maritime decarbonization; Port sustainability; PRISMA systematic review; Shipping emissionsAbstract
Decarbonization of global shipping and maritime ports has become a strategic priority for achieving international climate targets. Although research has expanded rapidly, existing reviews predominantly examine technological, operational, or policy dimensions separately, providing limited understanding of how interactions among vessels, ports, fuel infrastructure, and governance shape decarbonization pathways. This review addresses this limitation by introducing a system-level perspective that reconceptualizes maritime decarbonization as a coordination and sequencing challenge rather than a collection of independent technological solutions. An integrated review framework combining bibliometric science mapping with a PRISMA-based systematic review was adopted to analyze Scopus-indexed publications published between 2021 and early 2026. The bibliometric analysis examined 249 publications, while 62 studies meeting the PRISMA eligibility criteria were subjected to detailed qualitative synthesis. The study aims to identify the intellectual structure, emerging research themes, and cross-sector alignment challenges shaping maritime decarbonization pathways across vessels, ports, fuel infrastructure, and governance. Bibliometric analysis mapped the intellectual structure, thematic evolution, and collaborative landscape of the field, while qualitative synthesis examined empirical evidence related to alternative fuels, port decarbonization measures, and governance mechanisms. The findings reveal sustained growth in maritime decarbonization research, accompanied by persistent mismatches between vessel technology development, port infrastructure readiness, fuel supply systems, and regulatory implementation. The analysis further demonstrates that technological progress alone is insufficient to achieve effective maritime decarbonization unless these interconnected systems evolve in a coordinated manner. These persistent disconnects continue to constrain effective transition pathways despite significant advances in decarbonization technologies and policy initiatives. The proposed system-level analytical framework provides an evidence-based foundation for integrated policy development, infrastructure planning, and future research, supporting more coordinated and implementable maritime decarbonization strategies.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cite this article:
APA Style:
Zakaria, A., Arof, A. M., & Banomyong, R. (2027). Maritime decarbonization of shipping and ports: A system-oriented review of coordination, sequencing, and transition pathways. Maritime Technology and Research, 9(1), 289792. https://doi.org/10.33175/mtr.2027.289792
MDPI Style:
Zakaria, A.; Arof, A. M.; Banomyong, R. Maritime decarbonization of shipping and ports: A system-oriented review of coordination, sequencing, and transition pathways. Marit. Technol. Res. 2027, 9, 289792. https://doi.org/10.33175/mtr.2027.289792
Vancouver Style:
Zakaria A, Arof AM, Banomyong R. (2027). Maritime decarbonization of shipping and ports: A system-oriented review of coordination, sequencing, and transition pathways. Marit. Technol. Res. 9(1):289792. https://doi.org/10.33175/mtr.2027.289792
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Highlights
- Introduces a system-oriented analytical framework integrating bibliometric science mapping with a PRISMA-based systematic review.
- Reveals that successful maritime decarbonization depends on coordinated evolution of vessel technologies, port infrastructure, fuel systems, and governance.
- Identifies implementation bottlenecks, sequencing challenges, and cross-sector interactions shaping maritime decarbonization pathways.
- Bridges quantitative bibliometric evidence with qualitative synthesis to provide a comprehensive understanding of maritime transition dynamics.
- Offers practical guidance for aligning policy, infrastructure investment, and operational planning to accelerate maritime decarbonization.
References
Al-Enazi, A., Okonkwo, E. C., Bicer, Y., & Al-Ansari, T. (2021). A review of cleaner alternative fuels for maritime transportation. Energy Reports, 7, 1962-1985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.03.036
Alamoush, A. S., Olcer, A. I., & Ballini, F. (2022). Ports' role in shipping decarbonisation: A common port incentive scheme for shipping greenhouse gas emissions reduction. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 3, 100021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clscn.2021.100021
Ampah, J. D., Yusuf, A. A., Afrane, S., Jin, C., & Liu, H. (2021). Reviewing two decades of cleaner alternative marine fuels: Towards IMO's decarbonization of the maritime transport sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 320, 128871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128871
Anjomshoae, A., Banomyong, R., Mohammed, F., & Kunz, N. (2022). A systematic review of humanitarian supply chains performance measurement literature from 2007 to 2021. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 72, 102852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102852
Bach, H., & Hansen, T. (2023). IMO off course for decarbonisation of shipping? Three challenges for stricter policy. Marine Policy, 147, 105379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105379
Bakar, N. N. A., Bazmohammadi, N., Vasquez, J. C., & Guerrero, J. M. (2023). Electrification of onshore power systems in maritime transportation towards decarbonization of ports: A review of the cold ironing technology. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 178, 113243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113243
Balcombe, P., Staffell, I., Kerdan, I. G., Speirs, J. F., Brandon, N. P., & Hawkes, A. D. (2021). How can LNG-fuelled ships meet decarbonisation targets? An environmental and economic analysis. Energy, 227, 120462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120462
Barone, G., Buonomano, A., Del Papa, G., Giuzio, G. F., Maka, R., Palombo, A., & Russo, G. (2025). Steering shipping towards energy sustainability: Alternative fuels in decarbonization policies. Energy, 331, 136827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.136827
Bayer, M. U., Bilgili, L., Alkan, S., Atak, U., & Celik, V. (2025). Techno-economic and life-cycle assessment of hydrogen-ammonia fuel blends in tugboat engines. Sustainability, 17(22), 10285. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172210285
Bayraktar, M., & Yuksel, O. (2023). A scenario based assessment of the energy efficiency existing ship index (EEXI) and carbon intensity indicator (CII) regulations. Ocean Engineering, 278, 114295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114295
Benghalia, A., Ferdjallah, A., Oudani, M., & Boukachour, J. (2025). Machine learning and simulation for efficiency and sustainability in container terminals. Sustainability, 17(7), 2927. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17072927
Bolat, F. (2026). Time series modeling of greenhouse gas emissions: A case study for a chemical tanker ship. Maritime Technology and Research, 8(1), 278949. https://doi.org/10.33175/mtr.2026.278949
Boone, T., & Ganeshan, R. (2025). Freight mode choice with emission caps. Sustainability, 17(9), 4135. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17094135
Bouman, E. A., Lindstad, E., Rialland, A. I., & Stromman, A. H. (2017). State-of-the-art technologies, measures, and potential for reducing GHG emissions from shipping: A review. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 52, 408-421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.03.022
Chen, M., Yuan, X., Zhang, Y., & Liu, Y. A. (2025). Tripartite evolutionary game analysis of ports and shipping enterprises under carbon trading mechanisms: Incentives and policy implications. Journal of Cleaner Production, 529, 146773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146773
Choi, J., Seo, K., & Lim, S. (2025). Life cycle assessment for environment-friendly ferry service: A case study between South Korea and China. Regional Studies in Marine Science, 89, 104297. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.rsma.2025.104297
Christodoulou, A., & Cullinane, K. (2022). Potential alternative fuel pathways for compliance with the FuelEU Maritime Initiative. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 112, 103492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103492
Del Giudice, M., Di Vaio, A., Hassan, R., & Palladino, R. (2022). Digitalization and new technologies for sustainable business models at the ship-port interface: A bibliometric analysis. Maritime Policy & Management, 49(3), 410-446. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2021.1903600
Deng, Z., Zhu, B., Davis, S. J., Ciais, P., & Liu, Z. (2026). Global carbon emissions and decarbonization in 2025: Climate chronicles. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 7, 274-276. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-026-00780-4
Dolatabadi, S. H., Masodzadeh, P. G., Ishaq, H., & Crawford, C. (2025). Green shipping corridors: An overview of Pacific Northwest region and key ports. Ocean & Coastal Management, 269, 107745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107745
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Sahoo, S., Lim, W. M., & Joshi, Y. (2022). Thirty years of product and brand management research: A retrospective review of the Journal of Product and Brand Management using bibliometric analysis. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 31(8), 1141-1167. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-02-2022-3878
Douglas, C. M., Shanbhogue, S., Ghoniem, A., & Zang, G. (2025). Well-to-wake cost and emissions assessments for the Western Australia-East Asia green shipping corridor. Applied Energy, 384, 125465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125465
Fadiga, A., & Ferreira, L. M. D. (2024). Decarbonising maritime ports: A systematic review of the literature and insights for new research opportunities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 452, 142209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142209
Fan, A., Wang, J., He, Y., Perčić, M., Vladimir, N., & Yang, L. (2021). Decarbonising inland ship power system: Alternative solution and assessment method. Energy, 226, 120266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120266
Fan, H., Chen, P. S. L., Harris, A., Abdussamie, N., Gray, E. M. A., Penesis, I., & Mehr, J. A. (2025). Preliminary feasibility study of using hydrogen as a fuel for an aquaculture vessel in Tasmania, Australia. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 13(11), 2037. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13112037
Ge, P., Tang, D., Yuan, Y., Guerrero, J. M., & Zio, E. (2025). A hierarchical multi-objective co-optimization framework for sizing and energy management of coupled hydrogen-electricity energy storage systems at ports. Applied Energy, 384, 125451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125451
Gunnell, K. E., Belcourt, V. J., Tomasone, J. R., & Weeks, L. C. (2022). Systematic review methods. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 15(1), 5-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2021.1966823
Hazar, C., & Seyhan, A. (2025). Investigating ammonia as an alternative marine fuel: A SWOT analysis using the best-worst method. Sustainability, 17(20), 9314. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17209314
Holder, D., Percy, S. D., & Yavari, A. (2024). A review of port decarbonisation options: Identified opportunities for deploying hydrogen technologies. Sustainability, 16(8), 3299. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083299
Hu, Z., Wei, Y., Li, Q., & Li, C. (2025). Integrated optimization of storage node location and multi-commodities flow routes in multimodal transport networks with carbon emissions consideration. Energy, 328, 136567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.136567
International Maritime Organization. (2018). Initial IMO strategy on reduction of GHG emissions from ships. Retrieved from https://www.imo.org/en/ourwork/environment/pages/vision-and-level-of-ambition-of-the-initial-imo-strategy.aspx
International Maritime Organization. (2023). 2023 IMO strategy on reduction of GHG emissions from ships. Retrieved from https://www.imo.org/en/ourwork/environment/pages/2023-imo-strategy-on-reduction-of-ghg-emissions-from-ships.aspx
Ismail, A. M., Metwalli, M. M. A., & Alamoush, A. S. (2025). Towards safe maritime decarbonization: Safety barriers of methanol fuel. Sustainability, 17(11), 4896. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17114896
Jang, J., Woo, J. H., & Oh, D. (2025). Accounting for wave-induced environmental uncertainty in CO₂ emission predictions for maritime operations. Science of the Total Environment, 1007, 180955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.180955
Kaiser, R., & Chowdhury, A. M. (2025). Hydrogen-powered marine vessels: A rewarding yet challenging route to decarbonization. Clean Technologies, 7(3), 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol7030068
Karvounis, P., Theotokatos, G., Gu, B., & Zhou, P. (2025). Numerical investigation of marine dual-fuel engine operating with high shares of premixed hydrogen fuel using LES. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 13(10), 1961. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13101961
Katumwesigye, A., Schwartz, H., Gustafsson, M., & Hellström, M. (2025). A comparative technoeconomic and life cycle assessment of a fully battery-electric ROPAX ferry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 534, 146935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146935
Kosek, W., Chamier-Gliszczynski, N., Krześniak, M., & Zgorzelski, R. (2025). Baltic sea and polish ports as key elements in energy transition and security. Energies, 18(21), 5806. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18215806
Kwon, B. J., Oh, S. J., Jeong, B. U., Park, Y. M., & Shin, S. C. (2025). Life cycle assessment of shipbuilding materials and potential exposure under the EU CBAM: Scenario-based assessment and strategic responses. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 13(10), 1938. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13101938
Lehmann, N., Panagakos, G., & Barfod, M. B. (2025). Impact assessment of regulations on container shipping decarbonization: An evidence-based case study. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 146, 104902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2025.104902
Li, B., Cheng, L., Wang, H., Li, J., Xu, Z., & Pan, C. (2025). Carbon emission accounting and emission reduction path of container terminal under low-carbon perspective. Atmosphere, 16(10), 1158. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16101158
Li, C., Cariou, P., & Yang, D. (2025). Geopolitical risks and port-related carbon emissions: Evidence and policy implications. Transport Policy, 173, 103809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.103809
Lindstad, E., Lagemann, B., Rialland, A., Gamlem, G. M., & Valland, A. (2021). Reduction of maritime GHG emissions and the potential role of E-fuels. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 101, 103075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103075
Liu, B., Wang, X., Wang, Z., Zheng, J., & Sheng, D. (2025). Modeling and solving the joint berth allocation and vessel sequencing problem with speed optimization in a busy seaport. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 197, 104089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2025.104089
Liu, L., Wu, Y., Wang, Y., Wu, J., & Fu, S. (2022). Exploration of environmentally friendly marine power technology-ammonia/diesel stratified injection. Journal of Cleaner Production, 380, 135014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135014
Mahmud, K. K., Sheikh, W., & Chowdhury, M. M. H. (2025). Decision framework for sustainability assessment of alternative fuels to achieve shipping decarbonization. Ocean & Coastal Management, 265, 107637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107637
Mallouppas, G., & Yfantis, E. A. (2021). Decarbonization in shipping industry: A review of research, technology development, and innovation proposals. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 9(4), 415. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9040415
Mayanti, B., Hellström, M., & Katumwesigye, A. (2025). Assessing the decarbonization roadmap of a RoPax ferry. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 27(1), 123-146. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-024-00288-y
Nguyen, S., Gadel, M., Wang, K., Li, J., Zhang, X., Kong, S. C., Fu, X., & Qin, Z. (2025). Maritime decarbonization through machine learning: A critical systematic review of fuel and power prediction models. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 14, 100210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clscn.2025.100210
Nian, X., Wang, X., Jin, J., & Meng, L. (2025). How to improve the usage rate of shore power facilities? A multi-agent stochastic evolutionary game approach. Energy, 334, 137743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.137743
Nunes, L. J. (2025). Renewable methanol as an agent for the decarbonization of maritime logistic systems: A review. Future Transportation, 5(2), 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/futuretransp5020054
OECD. (2025). Alternative fuel supply and infrastructure: The role of shipbuilding in maritime decarbonisation. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/the-role-of-shipbuilding-in-maritime-decarbonisation_0c8362c0-en.html
Passas, I. (2024). Bibliometric analysis: The main steps. Encyclopedia, 4(2), 1014-1025. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia4020065
Paul, J., & Menzies, J. (2023). Developing classic systematic literature reviews to advance knowledge: Dos and don'ts. European Management Journal, 41(6), 815-820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2023.11.006
Raihan, A., Al Hasnat, M., Rahman, S. M., Ridwan, M., Rahman, M. M., Islam, M. T., Sarker, T., Dhar, B. K., & Bari, A. B. M. M. (2025). Recent advancements in alternative energies, technological innovations, and optimization strategies for seaport decarbonization. Innovation and Green Development, 4(3), 100252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igd.2025.100252
Sang, Y., Zhang, Z., Liu, S., & Song, C. (2026). Decarbonization pathways in the transport sector: A review of integrated assessment models and future directions for model improvement. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 225, 116204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.116204
Sevgili, C., Bayraktar, M., Seyhan, A., & Yuksel, O. (2025). Cold ironing impact on voyage carbon intensity in container shipping: Economic and regulatory insights. Sustainability, 17(12), 5556. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125556
Shi, J., Zhu, Y., Feng, Y., Yang, J., & Xia, C. (2023). A prompt decarbonization pathway for shipping: Green hydrogen, ammonia, and methanol production and utilization in marine engines. Atmosphere, 14(3), 584. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14030584
Song, D. P. (2024). A literature review of seaport decarbonisation: Solution measures and roadmap to net zero. Sustainability, 16(4), 1620. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041620
Sontakke, I., Bergström, M., Gosala, V., Baldauf, M., & Ehlers, S. (2026). Techno-economic analysis of decarbonization pathways for a deep-sea container vessel. Ship Technology Research, 73(1), 41-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/09377255.2025.2585247
Tavasszy, L., Köhler, J., Pernestål, A., Raoofi, Z., Schmid, J., & Brauer, C. (2026). Modeling the dynamics of freight transport decarbonization: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 20(7), 759-771. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2026.2618045
Wang, B., Liu, Q., Wang, L., Chen, Y., & Wang, J. (2023). A review of the port carbon emission sources and related emission reduction technical measures. Environmental Pollution, 320, 121000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121000
Wang, J., Li, H., Yang, Z., & Ge, Y. E. (2024). Shore power for reduction of shipping emission in port: A bibliometric analysis. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 188, 103639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2024.103639
Wang, M. R., Li, Z. C., Jiang, L., & Fu, X. (2025). Combined China-Europe Railway Express and maritime transport with subsidy and emission tax considerations. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 204, 104421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2025.104421
Yan, R., Wang, S., & Psaraftis, H. N. (2021). Data analytics for fuel consumption management in maritime transportation: Status and perspectives. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 155, 102489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2021.102489
Yang, M., Chen, L., Msigwa, G., Tang, K. H. D., & Yap, P. S. (2022). Implications of COVID-19 on global environmental pollution and carbon emissions with strategies for sustainability in the COVID-19 era. Science of the Total Environment, 809, 151657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151657
Zhang, J. Q., & Woo, S. H. (2025). Factors influencing the low carbon efficiency of container ports: A spatial analysis. Transport Policy, 171, 256-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.06.013
Zhang, W., Chen, W., Wu, X., Chen, J., & Zhang, Z. (2026). Evaluation and spatiotemporal analysis of low-carbon efficiency of the “ship-port” system. Maritime Policy & Management, 53(3), 491-523. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2025.2514765
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Maritime Technology and Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0






