A study of the principles in the way of Generation Y : Case study the students in Maejo University

Main Article Content

Ittipong Thongsrikate

Abstract

               A study of the principles in the way of Generation Y: Case study Maejo University. The objective of
the principles related to lifestyle and how to use the principles in daily life of population across Cogeneration
Y. The sample population was found Generation Y who are studying in the maejo University. The result
found that populations across Generation Y. Most females than males and 28.4 percent are 7.1.6. Studies in
the 1st year was the highest in Year 2 and 3 59.1, 37.3 and 3.6 percent, respectively, and enrolled in the
social sciences, and science, 59.1 and 48.5 percent similar in principle. Associated with the lifestyle of the
population, but Generation Y finds principles that cause human relationships are the principles that are most
relevant (path of accomplishment 4) 36.0 percent on the principles for disproved (The Four noble Truths)
23.8 percent and principles for the development of their own (Basic Morality 8 ) 7.7 percent for how to use the principles found. Principles that cause human (path of accomplishment 4) can be used in daily life by
considering modular but integrated together. Self-development as can be developed. Lifestyle helps manage
themselves and others to be happy and as a reminder for all mankind, starting from myself. However,
although the growth of the material and the entry of the technology will be part of the livelihood of
populations across Generation Y, but there are principles that hold the mental space that can offer this
population can live happily together in society.

Article Details

How to Cite
Thongsrikate, I. . (2015). A study of the principles in the way of Generation Y : Case study the students in Maejo University. Nakhon Lampang Buddhist College’s Journal, 4(1). retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/NBJ/article/view/253097
Section
Research Article

References

กานต์พิชชา เก่งการช่าง. “เจนเนอเรชั่นวายกับความท้าทายใหม่ในการบริหารทรัพยากรบุคคล”. วารสารสังคมศาสตร์และศิลปะศาสตร์. ปีที่ 2. ฉบับที่ 1.
เดชา เดชะวัฒนไพศาล และคณะ. “การศึกษาเจนเนอเรชั่นเอ็กซ์และเจอเนอเรชั่นวายในมุมมองต่อคุณลักษณะของตนเองและความคาดหวังต่อคุณลักษณะของเจนเนอเรชั่นอื่น”. จุฬาลงกรณ์ธุรกิจปริทัศน์. 2557. หน้า 1-17.
ราม เชื้อสถาปนศิริ. “ 7 พฤติกรรมการสื่อสารคนรุ่นวาย (7 is of Gen Y’s communication)”. วารสารเพื่อน ThaiPBS.
Bell, N.S., and Narz. M., “Meeting the challenges of age diversity in the workplace”. The CPA Journal.
(February 2007). pp. 56-59.
Glass, A., “Understanding generational differences for competitive success”. Industrial and Commercial
Training. (2007). pp.39. 2. 98-103.
Gelston, S., “Gen Y. Gen X and Baby Boomers: Generation Wars at Work”. CIO. (May 2007). p. 5.
Howe, N. & Strauss. W. Millennial Rising: The Next Great Generation. New York: Random House. 2000.
Hurst, J.L. & Good, L.K., “Generation Y and career choice: The impact of retail career perceptions.
expectations and entitlement perceptions”. Career Development International. (2009): pp.14. 6.570-593.
Reisenwitz, T. H. & Lyer. R., “Differences in generation X and generation Y: Implications for the organization
and marketers”. The Marketing Management Journal, (2009). pp.19. 2. 91-103.
Wong, M., Gardiner. E., Lang, W. and Coulon. L., “Generational differences in personality and motivation: Do
they exist and what are the implications for the workplace?”. Journal of Managerial Psychology.
(2008). pp.23. 8. 878-90.