GUIDELINES FOR EMPOWERMENT OF SCHOOL ADMINISTATORS
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The goal of the empowerment of educational institution administrators is to improve the administration of educational institutions through the analysis and synthesis of documents on the subject. These documents comprise three main components and guidelines for the management of educational institutions by those in charge: elements at the individual, team, and organizational levels. Six prerequisites must be accomplished for executives to be empowered: 1) traits, 2) abilities, 3) assurances of success, 4) self-control, 5) systems and structures that offer assistance, and 6) accountability for doing self-evaluations and putting extra procedures in place. Five stages to empowerment: 1) Establishing the intended outcomes; 2) Establishing the operational rules; 3) Determining the resources; 4) Establishing the duties; 5) Establishing the penalties. The process of empowering executives involves a number of steps, such as improving academic performance, gaining leadership experience, forging strong connections, assembling a cohesive team through effective communication, and establishing an environment within the company that fosters knowledge sharing. Other steps include monitoring and assessment, fortifying support, and encouraging, advising, and mentoring collaboration. Empowerment will lead to successful growth at the individual, team, and organizational levels when the aforementioned is put into practice. Teachers and staff will be the ones who directly benefit from empowerment. Student development will be more effective when staff members and instructors are prepared to work to the best of their abilities.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Brown, R. (1986). Social psychology. Simon and Schuster. New York: Free Press.
Chomsawai, T., Sathapornpotchana S., & Chalayawathet, N. (2020). Empowerment for teachers in the 21st century. Journal of Corporate Management and Local Innovation, 6(1), 123 -136.
Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1998). Charismatic leadership in organizations. Sage Publications. New York: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Covey, S.R. (1991). Principle-Centered Leadership. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Greasley, P. E., & Bocârnea, M. C. (2014). The relationship between personality type and the servant leadership characteristic of empowerment. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 124, 11-19.
Gunden, E., & Crissman, S. (1992). Leadership skills for empowerment. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 16(3), 6-10.
Jones, J. E., & Bearley, W. L. (1988). Empowerment: The challenge and the promise. King of Prussia, PA: Organization Design and Development, Inc.
Office of the Basic Education Commission, Ministry of Education. (2009). Strategic plan. Raising the quality of secondary education, fiscal year 2009-2012. Bangkok: Chamchum Printing House. Agricultural Cooperative of Thailand Limited.
Phoklin, S. (2017). Effective administration of modern educational institutions. Ubon Ratchathani: Yongsawat Intergroup.
Ritrod, P. (2013). Empowerment-based basic educational institution administration model. Journal of Education Naresuan University, 15(1), 60-69.
Salge, C., Glackin, C., & Polani, D. (2014). Empowerment–an introduction. Guided Self-Organization: Inception, 67-114.
Scott, C.D. & Jaffe, D. T. (1991). Empowerment: Building a committed Workforce. California: Koga Page .
Spreitzer, G. M. (1997). Toward a common ground in defining empowerment. In National Academy of Management Meetings, 1995, Vancouver, BC, Canada; An earlier version was presented at the aforementioned conference. Elsevier Science/JAI Press.
Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of management review, 15(4), 666-681.
