THE ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF PIG PRODUCTION IN MUEANG DISTRICT BURIRAM PROVINCE

Main Article Content

pawidhan panumram
Sira Phetjamroensuk
Buncha Chantrat
Areerat Lunlalad

Abstract

This research aimed to study the general economic and social condition of pig farmers, pig production condition, and analyzy the finalcial costs and returns of pig farming in Mueang Didtrict, Buriram Province. The study employed purposive sampling,collecting data through interviews using questionnaires. The data were then analyzed using descriptive analysis. Findings show that most pig farmers in the district are men, on average 48 years old, with primary school education and 12 years of experience in pig farming. They typically raise pigs on small farms of 30-50 pigs and rely on funding from financial institutions. The farmers' production capacity is typically 100-200 pigs per round, using commercial hybrid strains, with feeding done in a pour-on style and common antibiotic use. However, farmers lack knowledge about vaccine usage. Most use traditional farming technology, yielding an average of 80-100 kg per farm, and only 20 percent passed GAP. The analysis of the cost and returns on a farm of 100 animals per round found that the total production cost was 579,000 baht, with variable costs as high as 468,000 baht and fixed cost of 61,000 bath.The total income was 583,000 baht, resulting in a net profit of 50,000 baht per round or 500 baht per farm, with a net profit margin of 8.64 percent with an Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of 17 %,The break-even point was only 55 animals, and the payback period was 5 year . However, there is still a high risk from epidemics, fluctuating prices, and government policy. Therefore, good risk management is required. 

Article Details

How to Cite
panumram, pawidhan, Phetjamroensuk, S. ., Chantrat , B. ., & Lunlalad , A. . (2024). THE ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF PIG PRODUCTION IN MUEANG DISTRICT BURIRAM PROVINCE. Nakhon Lampang Buddhist College’s Journal, 13(2), 191–205. retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/NBJ/article/view/273979
Section
Research Article

References

Baum, R., & Bienkowski, J. (2020). Eco-efficiency in measuring the sustainable production of agricultural crops. Sustainability,12(4),1-12.

Department of Livestock Development. (2022). Livestock population data in Thailand 2022. Retrieved February 20, 2023, from https://region6.dld.go.th/webnew/pdf/it6565.pdf

Komlatskiy, V., & Smolkin, R. (2023). Precision technologies in pig farming. E3S Web of Conferences, EDP Sciences. (0357) 1-6, https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202337103057

Nguyen, T. et al. (2023). Increasing sustainability in pork production by using high inclusion levels of co-products distillers dried grains with solubles, wheat middling and canola meal doesn't affect pig growth performance and meat quality but reduces boar taint. Animal Bioscience, 36(7), 1091-1100.

Rizzo, A. et al. (2023). Antimicrobial resistance and current alternatives in veterinary practice: A review. Current Pharmaceutical Design, 29(5), 312-322.

Singh, M. et al. (2023). Participatory assessment of management and biosecurity practices of smallholder pig farms in North East India. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 10, 1-10.

Sriwica, N., & Pilangam, P. (2021). A feasibility study of swine farm business investment in Nong Han District, Udon Thani Province. Journal of Modern Learning Development, 6(6), 118-131.

Tuyttens, F. A. M., Van Gansbeke, S., & Ampe, B. (2011). Survey among Belgian pig producers about the introduction of group housing systems for gestating sows. Journal of Animal Science, 89(3), 845-855.

Wang, G. et al. (2022). The regulatory effect of herd structure on pig production under the environmental regulation. PLOS ONE, 17(4), 1-13.

Witt, J., Krieter, J., Wilder, T., & Czycholl, I. (2023). Measuring welfare in rearing piglets: Test–retest reliability of selected animal-based indicators. Journal of Animal Science,101(7),1-14.