LEADERSHIP OF EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION ADMINISTRATORS PRIVATE SCHOOLS IN MUEANG DISTRICT, CHUMPHON PROVINCE

Main Article Content

วรพร นุชสมบูรณ์
พนิดา สินสุวรรณ
วราลักษณ์ ศรีกันทา

Abstract

This research aims to 1) study the leadership of school administrators in private schools, 2) compare the leadership of school administrators from the perspective of teachers, classified by gender, and 3) investigate the management methods and approaches of school administrators in private schools in Mueang District, Chumphon Province. This study employs both quantitative and qualitative research methods. The sample group consists of teachers from five private schools in Mueang District, Chumphon Province, totaling 202 teachers. The research instruments include questionnaires and interviews. Group discussions were conducted with five school administrators and five academic department heads, totaling ten participants, to explore the management approaches of private school administrators. Statistical analysis involved frequency counts, percentages, means, and standard deviations, with results presented descriptively.


The findings revealed that the overall leadership level of school administrators was rated as high (μ = 4.15, σ = 0.47). When considering individual aspects, ranked from highest to lowest, these were: 1) Personal authority (μ = 4.21, σ = 0.52), 2) Continuous situational assessment (μ = 4.17, σ = 0.57), 3) Confident communication (μ = 4.16, σ = 0.57), 4) Use of information technology (μ = 4.13, σ = 0.55), 5) Willingness to take risks (μ = 4.12, σ = 0.43), and 6) Vision, goal, and mission setting (μ = 4.08, σ = 0.44), respectively.


Regarding the comparison of leadership by gender, male administrators had a higher average score than female administrators. In managing private schools, administrators should focus on the following areas: 1) Ideology: Administrators should develop transformational leadership by clearly demonstrating a vision and fostering teachers' confidence in their work. 2) Motivation: Administrators should consistently encourage teachers and provide guidance and support in their tasks. 3) Work processes: Administrators should propose strategies that help teachers work systematically and encourage creative thinking. Suggestions for future research: In terms of setting vision, goals, and missions, administrators should define school objectives that align with a clear vision to ensure effective management with a clear direction and measurable outcomes.

Article Details

How to Cite
นุชสมบูรณ์ ว., พนิดา สินสุวรรณ, & วราลักษณ์ ศรีกันทา. (2025). LEADERSHIP OF EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION ADMINISTRATORS PRIVATE SCHOOLS IN MUEANG DISTRICT, CHUMPHON PROVINCE. Nakhon Lampang Buddhist College’s Journal, 14(1), 69–82. retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/NBJ/article/view/277704
Section
Research Article

References

Amranan, K. (2016). A study of creative leadership of school administrators in Mae Wong District, under the Office of the Primary

Educational Service Area 2, Nakhon Sawan. Master of Education Thesis, Educational Administration Program, Nakhon Sawan

Rajabhat University.

Cavazos, J. M. (1999). The instructional leadership of high school principals in successful hispania majority high school. Ph.D.

Dissertation. Factory of Graduate school. The University of Texas at Austin.

Chumphon Provincial Education Office. (2024). Chumphon Provincial Education Information, Academic Year 2024. Policy and Planning

Group.

Duckworth. (2005). The relationship between self-perceived power Bases of participants of the Center for leadership training program

and 360-degree feedback evaluations from colleagues. Dissertation Abstracts International, 65 (11), 6078A. Retrieved April 17, 2022,

from http://www.umi.com

Greenleaf. (1997) .Servant leadership. Mahwah, New Jerssey: Paulist Press.

Lakkham, P.(2017). The relationship between transformational leadership of school administrators and teamwork of teachers under the

Office of the Primary Educational Service Area, Chaiyaphum Area 2. Thesis, Master of Education,Educational Administration Program,

Faculty of Education, Maha Sarakham University.

Likert, R. (1967). The human organization ; Its management and value. New York:McGraw-Hill.

Manpan, P.(2022).Charismatic Leadership of Private School Administrators. Doctor of Philosophy Thesis. Educational Administration

Program. Silpakorn University.

Phumphaka, A. (2021). Leadership of school administrators according to the views of teachers under the Office of the Primary

Educational Service Area of Nakhon Si Thammarat Area 3. Nakbut Paritta Journal. Nakhon Si Thammarat Rajabhat University. Year 13,

Issue 3, September - December 2021.

Srisat, B. (2013). New revised preliminary research. (9th printing). Bangkok: Suririyasan.

Suraprasit, C. (2016). Leadership of the Subdistrict Administrative Organization Heads in Phichit Province. Master's Thesis. Nakhon

Sawan: Nakhon Sawan Rajabhat University.

Suphawittayacharoenkun, N.(2017).Leadership of school administrators under the Office of Sakon Nakhon Primary Educational Service

Area 1. Master of Education Thesis, Educational Administration Program, Sakon Nakhon Rajabhat University, Sakon Nakhon.

Thiankanchat, O.(2017).Behavioral leadership of school administrators that affects teachers' work motivation. Master of Education

Thesis. Ramkhamhaeng University.

Watson. (2000). Watson, Samy Hanna. Leadership Requirements in the 21st Century: The Perceptions of Canadian Private Sector

Leaders, Dissertation Abstracts International.13(1),43-57.Retrieved January15,2013, from

http://www.annbadillo.com/leadership/2013/01/