A MODEL OF QUALITY SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION
Main Article Content
Abstract
The research titled " "Model of Administration for High-Quality Secondary Schools" employed a mixed methods approach, integrating both qualitative and quantitative methodologies. The research design was guided by three primary objectives: 1) to study the foundational information for developing a management model for quality secondary schools through document synthesis related to key management components and academic seminars with nine experts, 2) to develop and validate the proposed management model by utilizing data from document analysis, expert interviews, and an assessment of the needs of secondary schools. The model was then reviewed and validated by the same group of nine experts, and 3) to evaluate the appropriateness and practical applicability of the model through a survey of 133 stakeholders and a direct evaluation of suitability and usefulness by a sample of 38 participants. Data were analyzed using content analysis, frequency distribution, percentage, mean, standard deviation, and the Modified Priority Needs Index (PNI Modified).
The research found that the developed management model for high-quality secondary schools is effective, practical, accurate, feasible, appropriate, and beneficial for educational management. It aligns with the context of schools, global changes, and meets the needs of students and communities. The model consists of five key components: 1) management principles, 2) management objectives, 3) management processes, 4) evaluation guidelines, and 5) success factors. The model was validated through expert panel discussions and evaluations. Results showed the model’s accuracy was at the highest level ( = 4.63, S.D. = 0.46), and feasibility was rated high ( = 4.44, S.D. = 0.48). Stakeholder feedback indicated the model was highly appropriate ( = 4.67) and highly beneficial ( = 4.68).
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Bunyapho, S. (2012). Developing students' desirable characteristics based on the theory of multiple intelligences. (Doctoral
dissertation). Khon Kaen University. Khon Kaen.
Bunyapho, S. (2012). Strategies for educational quality development. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Daengseeda, K. (2020). Guidelines for managing learning resources in digital era schools under the Phitsanulok Primary Educational
Service Area Office 1. (Master’s thesis). Uttaradit Rajabhat University. Uttaradit.
Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2020). Draft model of community quality schools under the Office of the Basic Education
Commission. Bangkok: OBEC.
Pengsawat, W. (2010). Educational management in Thailand: A case study approach. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.
Srisaart, B. (2002). Research and statistics for the behavioral sciences (pp. 104–106). Bangkok: Tipwisut Publishing.
Srisawat, B. (2002). Basic research. (7th ed.). Bangkok: Suviriyasarn Publishing.
Uppinjai, S. et al. (2021). Educational quality management systems and mechanisms in basic education institutions responsive to future
world changes. Journal of the Art of Management, 6(3), n.p.
Wattana, P. (2018). A study of factors affecting teacher performance in secondary schools. (Master’s thesis). Chulalongkorn University.
Bangkok.
Wongwanich, S. (2015). Needs assessment research. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.
Yodprang, S. (2018). Causal factors affecting internal quality assurance of basic education schools under the Office of Primary
Educational Service Area .(Doctoral dissertation). Kanchanaburi Rajabhat University. Kanchanaburi.