Work environment affecting quality of life of personnel at Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University

Authors

  • Somchai Puangsumrong College of Innovation and Management, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University
  • Panida Ninaroon College of Innovation and Management, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University

Keywords:

Working environment, quality of work life, university personnel, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University

Abstract

The objectives of this research were to study 1) the level of work environment and quality of work life of personnel at Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, and 2) the work environment factors affecting the quality of work life of the personnel. The sample group consisted of 278 personnel selected by stratified random sampling. Data were collected using questionnaires and analyzed using percentage, mean, standard deviation, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and stepwise multiple regression analysis. The findings revealed that 1) the work environment and quality of work life overall were at a high level, with means of 4.42 and 4.24 respectively. The Physical Aspect, a component of the work environment, received the highest evaluation (ð‘ĨĖ…=4.51), while Welfare and Benefits received the lowest (ð‘ĨĖ…=4.26). For the quality of work life, Participation and Relationships with Others received the highest evaluation (ð‘ĨĖ…=4.37), while Adequate and Fair Compensation received the lowest (ð‘ĨĖ…=4.07), and 2) all five aspects of the work environment could explain 80.7 percent of the variance in the quality of work life with statistical significance. The four factors which significantly predicted the quality of work life were Welfare and Benefits (Îē=.311), Colleagues (Îē=.237), Supervisor (Îē=.219), and Physical Aspects (Îē=.190), whereas the Nature of the Work Performed was not a statistically significant factor.

References

āļ›āļīāļĒāļĄāļēāļ āļĢāļ“āđŒ āļ āļđāļŦāļ™āļ­āļ‡āđ‚āļ­āļ‡. (2562). āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļžāļķāļ‡āļžāļ­āđƒāļˆāđƒāļ™āļŠāļ āļēāļžāđāļ§āļ”āļĨāđ‰āļ­āļĄāļāļēāļĢāļ—āļģāļ‡āļēāļ™ āđāļĨāļ°āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļœāļđāļāļžāļąāļ™āļ•āđˆāļ­āļ­āļ‡āļ„āđŒāļāļĢāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļšāļļāļ„āļĨāļēāļāļĢāļĻāļđāļ™āļĒāđŒāļ™āļ§āļąāļ•āļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āļĢāļđāđ‰ āļĄāļŦāļēāļ§āļīāļ—āļĒāļēāļĨāļąāļĒāļĻāļĢāļĩāļ™āļ„āļĢāļīāļ™āļ—āļĢāļ§āļīāđ‚āļĢāļ’. āļ§āļēāļĢāļŠāļēāļĢ Mahidol R2R e-Journal, 6(2), 55-69. https://doi.org/10.14456/jmu.2019.14

āļĄāļŦāļēāļ§āļīāļ—āļĒāļēāļĨāļąāļĒāļĢāļēāļŠāļ āļąāļāļŠāļ§āļ™āļŠāļļāļ™āļąāļ™āļ—āļē. (2568). āļĄāļŦāļēāļ§āļīāļ—āļĒāļēāļĨāļąāļĒāļĢāļēāļŠāļ āļąāļāļŠāļ§āļ™āļŠāļļāļ™āļąāļ™āļ—āļē. https://ssru.ac.th/index.php

āļŠāļļāļ—āļ˜āļīāļ™āļąāļ™āļ—āļ™āđŒ āļžāļĢāļŦāļĄāļŠāļļāļ§āļĢāļĢāļ“ āđāļĨāļ° āļĻāļĢāļīāļāļāļē āđ„āļĨāđ‰āļŠāļ§āļąāļŠāļ”āļīāđŒāļŠāļļāļ—āļ˜āļĢāļąāļ•āļ™āļāļļāļĨ. (2565). āļ›āļąāļˆāļˆāļąāļĒāļŠāđˆāļ§āļ™āļšāļļāļ„āļ„āļĨāđāļĨāļ°āļ„āļļāļ“āļ āļēāļžāļŠāļĩāļ§āļīāļ•āđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢ āļ—āļģāļ‡āļēāļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļĄāļĩāļœāļĨāļ•āđˆāļ­āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļœāļđāļāļžāļąāļ™āļ•āđˆāļ­āļ­āļ‡āļ„āđŒāļāļēāļĢ: āļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļāļĢāļ“āļĩāļšāļĢāļīāļĐāļąāļ—āļ›āļĢāļ°āļāļąāļ™āļŠāļĩāļ§āļīāļ•āđāļŦāđˆāļ‡āļŦāļ™āļķāđˆāļ‡āđƒāļ™āļāļĢāļļāļ‡āđ€āļ—āļžāļĄāļŦāļēāļ™āļ„āļĢ. āļ§āļēāļĢāļŠāļēāļĢāļšāļąāļ“āļ‘āļīāļ•āļĻāļķāļāļĐāļē āļĄāļŦāļēāļ§āļīāļ—āļĒāļēāļĨāļąāļĒāļĢāļēāļŠāļ āļąāļāļŠāļ§āļ™āļŠāļļāļ™āļąāļ™āļ—āļē, 15(1), 1–17.

āļ­āļąāļˆāļ‰āļĢāļē āļŠāļąāļ™āđāļŠāļ‡. (2566). āļ„āļļāļ“āļ āļēāļžāļŠāļĩāļ§āļīāļ•āļāļēāļĢāļ—āļģāļ‡āļēāļ™āļāļąāļšāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļœāļđāļāļžāļąāļ™āļ•āđˆāļ­āļ­āļ‡āļ„āđŒāļāļēāļĢāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļšāļļāļ„āļĨāļēāļāļĢ āļŠāļģāļ™āļąāļāļ‡āļēāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļē āļāļĢāļļāļ‡āđ€āļ—āļžāļĄāļŦāļēāļ™āļ„āļĢ. āļ§āļēāļĢāļŠāļēāļĢāļ§āļīāļ—āļĒāļēāļāļēāļĢāļˆāļąāļ”āļāļēāļĢāļāļēāļĢāļšāļĢāļīāļŦāļēāļĢāļŠāļēāļ˜āļēāļĢāļ“āļ°āđāļĨāļ°āđ€āļ­āļāļŠāļ™, 1(3), 10–21.

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2023). Job demands-resources theory and work engagement in the post-pandemic era. Journal of Applied Psychology, 108(3), 345-362.

Delamotte, Y., & Takezawa, S. (1984). Quality of working life in international perspective. International Labour Organization.

Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250–279.

Huse, E. F., & Cummings, T. G. (1985). Organizational development and change (3rd ed.). West.

Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). John Wiley.

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610.

Luthans, F., & Kreitner, R. (1985). Organizational behavior modification and beyond: An operant and social learning approach. Scott, Foresman.

McCoy, J. M., & Evans, G. W. (2002). The potential role of the physical environment in fostering creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 14(3), 409–426.

Polat, Ş., & Özdemir, M. (2020). An examination of relationship between job characteristics and work-life balance according to the teachers’ opinions. Education and Science, 46(205), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2020.7944

Schneider, B. (1990). The climate for service: An application of the climate construct. In B. Schneider (Ed.), Organizational climate and culture (pp. 383–412). Jossey-Bass.

Walton, R. E. (1973). Quality of working life: What is it? Sloan Management Review, 15(1), 11-21.

World Health Organization. (2022). WHO guidelines on mental health at work. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240053052

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30