The Effects of Inquiry 5Es Learning Management Emphasizing Scientific Explanation on Science Achievement in the Topic of Weather and Scientific Explanation of Matthayom Suksa I Students at Nawamintrachinuthit Suankularb Wittayalai Pathumthani School in Pathumthani Province
Keywords:
Inquiry 5Es Learning Management, Scientific Explanation, Science AchievementAbstract
The purposes of this research were to 1) compare science achievement on the topic of Weather of MathayomSuksa I students after learning between experimental group and control group 2) compare Scientific Explanation of MathayomSuksa I students after learning between experimental group and control group, and 3) compare Scientific explanation of MathayomSuksa I students of control group between before and after learning.
The sample consisted of 88 MathayomSuksa I students in two heterogeneous classrooms who were studying in the second semester of the 2018 academic year, obtained by cluster random sampling. They were the experimental group and the control group. The experimental group was MathayomSuksa I students who learned by using the Inquiry 5Es Learning Management Emphasizing Scientific Explanation. The control group was MathayomSuksa I students who learned by using the conventional teaching method. The research instruments were 1) Inquiry 5Es Learning Management Emphasizing Scientific Explanation lesson plans, 2) conventional lesson plans, 3) Science Achievement test on the topic of Weather, 4) Scientific Explanation test 5) Scientific Explanation record form and 6) after teaching record form. Statistics for data analysis were mean, standard deviation and t-test
Research finding revealed that (1) Science Achievement on the topic of weather of the experimental group was significantly higher than the control group at the .05 level, (2) Scientific Explanation of the experimental group was significantly higher than the control group at the .05 level, and (3) Scientific Explanation of the experimental group after learning was significantly higher than before learning at the .05 level.
References
Anuworrachai S. (2010). Effects Biology Instruction Using The Argument-Driven Inquiry Instructional Model on Ability in Scientific Explanation Making and Rationality of Upper Secondary School Students. Master of Education Thesis in Science Education, Chulalongkorn University. [in Thai]
__________. (2014). Science Learning Management by Using the Scientific Explanation. STOU Education Journal. 7(2), 1-14. [in Thai]
Chaupanich C. (1999). Scientific concepts: Basic process in research. Teaching and Research at secondary level: Article combination. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University. [in Thai]
Chumsaeng T., Jantarakantee E., Chiangga S. (2017). The Development of Grade 10 students’ Scientific Explanation Ability in Equilibrium Unit Using Context-Based Approach. Retrieved from https://gsbooks.gs.kku.ac.th/60/nigrc2017/pdf/HMO5.pdf. [in Thai]
Jamjai, O. (2014). The Development of Grade 9 Students’ Ability in Making Scientific Explanation Using Argumentation and Inquiry Approach. Master of Art in Teaching Thesis in teaching Science, Kasetsart University. [in Thai]
Khaemmanee T. (2017). Teaching Science: Knowledge to Organize Learning Process Performance. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University. [in Thai]
Mcneill, K. L. and Krajcik J.S. (2008). Inquiry and Scientific Explanations: Helping Students Use Evidence and Reasoning. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/.
National Institute of Educational Testing Service. The Summary of Ordinary National Educational Test (O-NET) Matthayom Suksa 3 of 2017 academic year. Retrieved from http://www.newonetresult.niets.or.th/AnnouncementWeb/PDF/SummaryONETM3_2560.pdf. [in Thai]
Peker, D. and Wallace, C. S. (2009). Characterizing High School Students’ written Explanations in Biology Laboratories. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/.
Phattarawat K. (2016). PISA 2015 Important lessons from the international level. Retrieved from https://thaipublica.org/2016/12/kraiyos-pisa-2015/. [in Thai]
Prisant, N. (2012). The Effects of Using the Inquiry Teaching Method with a Science Learning Activities Package in the Topic of Substances in Daily Life on Learning Achievement and Creative Thinking in Science of PrathomSuksa VI Students in PrajimPattana School Group under Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya Primary Education Service Area Office 2 in Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya Province. Master of Education (Curriculum and Instruction), Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University. [in Thai].
Roadrangka V. (1997). CONSTRUCTIVISM. Bangkok: Kasetsart University. [in Thai]
Sampson V. et al. (2010, October 11). Argument‐Driven Inquiry as a way to help students learn how to participate in scientific argumentation and craft written arguments: An exploratory study. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/.
Sirithon N. & Jantarakantee E. (2019). Implementing argument-driven inquiry approach for developing grade 10th students’ ability in making scientific explanation in the topic of force, mass, and law of motion. Silpakorn University Journal. 39(1), 130-141. [in Thai]
Tangkitvanich S. (2017). Quality development of science teachers in the 4.0 era. Retrieved from https://tdri.or.th/2017/12/sciteacherreform/. [in Thai]
The institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology (IPST). (2010). Biological handbook of Matthayom Suksa 4-6. Bangkok: Kurusapa Printing Ladphrao.
The institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology (IPST). (2017). Basic information summary of PISA 2015. Retrieved from https://pisathailand.ipst.ac.th/pisa-2015-basic-summary/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
บทความทุกบทความเป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของวารสารคณะศึกษาศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยเกษตรศาสตร์ วิทยาเขตบางเขน
วารสารศึกษาศาสตร์ปริทัศน์ (Kasetsart Educational Review)
