A Comparison of Concept on Solid Liquid Gas of Grade 10 Students Using Model Based Learning (MBL) and the Conventional Learning Management
Keywords:
Model based learning, ConceptsAbstract
This research aimed to 1) compare concept on solid liquid gas of grade 10 students before and after learning using Model-Based learning and the conventional learning management, and 2) compare concept on solid liquid gas of grade 10 students after learning between using Modelbased learning and the conventional learning management. The sample group was grade 10 students in the second academic year of 2018 at Lamplaimat School, Lamplaimat District, Buriram Province. There was 79 students selected by cluster random sampling and simple random sampling. These samples were divided into two groups: Mathayomsuksa 4/2 using Model-Based learning and Mathayomsuksa 4/4 using the conventional learning management. The study tools were 6 lesson plans with Model-Based learning on solid liquid gas unit and 6 lesson plans with conventional learning management solid liquid gas unit and the solid liquid gas concepts test. The data were analyzed by Percentage, Mean, Standard deviation (S.D) and t-test statistic. The results showed that
1. A comparison of concepts on solid liquid gas of grade 10 students before and after learning using Model-Based learning and the conventional learning management was found that after learning was higher than before learning management with statistical significance at .05 level. Mean of concepts before using Model-based learning is 4.83(16.08%) , mean of concepts after using Model-based learning is 22.77(75.90%) and mean of concepts before using the conventional learning management is 5.10 (17.01%) , mean of concepts after using the conventional learning management is 16.68 (55.60%).
2. Concepts on solid liquid gas after learning between using Model-Based learning and the conventional learning management was found that after learning using Model-Based learning was higher than after learning using the conventional learning management with statistical significance at the .05 level. Mean of concepts after using Model-based learning is 22.77(75.90%)and mean of concepts after using the conventional learning management is 16.68 (55.60%).
3. The most developed concepts from the model-based learning is the relationship between the gas pressure, gas temperature, gas volume and number of gas molecules, students have Sound Understanding ( SU) increased by 70% before learning. The most developed concepts from the conventional learning management is the effect of temperature and pressure on gas volume, students have Sound Understanding ( SU) increased by 24.79% before learning.
4. The most of Specific Misconception (SM) from the model-based learning is the particle arrangement of solids and The most of Specific Misconception ( SM) from the conventional learning management is the evaporation of liquid.
References
Abraham, M.R., Grzybowki, E.B., Renner, J.W. & Marek, E.A. (1992). Understanding and misunderstanding of eighth graders of five chemistry concepts found in textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(2),105-120.
Barak, M. & Hussein-Farraj, R. (2013). Integrating Model-Based Learning and Animations for Enhancing Students' Understanding of Proteins Structure and Function. Research in Science Education, 43(2), 619-636.
Bootvisate, P., Pathommapas, N. & Muangpatom, C. (2015). The Development of Model-Centered Instruction Sequence Learning Management on Chemical Bond Concepts of Matthayomsuksa 4 Students. Journal of Research Unit on Science, Technology and Environment for Learning, 6(2), 157-174. [in Thai]
Buckley C, B.e.a. (2004). Model-Based Teaching and Learning with Bio Logica TM: What Do They Learn? How Do They Learn? How Do We Know?. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(1),23-41.
Carin, A.A. & Bass, J.E. (1997). Teaching Science as Inquriy (9thed). New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Dechakhup, P. (2010). Science teaching behavior (2nd ed). Bangkok: Institute of academic development (IAD). [in Thai]
Department of Academic. (1992). Curriculum for Secondary education in 1990 (revised edition in 1998). Bangkok: Religion Press. [in Thai]
Faikhamta, C., Boonsawansong, P. & Roadrangka, V. (2006). Surveying knowledge of chemistry content of science students. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 27(1), 27-38.[in Thai]
Gobert, J. D., & B.C. Buckley. (2002). Introduction to model-based teaching and learning in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 891-894.Retrieved from http://zeus.physics.auth.gr//edutech_2007/yliko/modelling/modelling_3.pdf.
Halloun, I. (1998). Schematic Concepts for Schematic Models of The Real World : The Newtonian Concept of Force. Science Education, 82, 239-263.
Hestenes, D. (2006). Notes for a Modeling Theory of Science, Cognition and Instruction.In Berg, E., Ellemeijer, T. and Sloonten, O. Proceeding GIREP Conference 2006: Modeling in Physics and Physics Education. University van Amsterdam. Amstel Institute, Faculty of Science.
Ibrahim, B. B. (2009). Model-based teaching and learning of kinematics in an introductory physics course for underprepared students. (Doctoral dissertation).University of Cape Town, Faculty of Science, Department of Physics.
Kawatkul, A., Prommas, C. & Chaipraser, P. (2015). Effects of Learning on Biomolecule using Model-Base Learning to Develop Scientific Conceptions and Constructing Scientific model ability for Mathayousuksa six students. Journal of Education, 26(2), 42-55. [in Thai]
Kenyon, L., C. Schwarz, & B. Hug. (2008). The benefits of Scientific modeling. (n.p.). pp 41-44.
Klainil, S., Dechsri, P. & Pramojanee, A. (2008). Scientific knowledge and competency For tomorrow's world: Learning Assessment Report from the International Student Assessment Program (PISA 2006).Bangkok: The Institute for the Promotion ofTeaching Science and Technology. [in Thai]
Lomarak, T. (2013). Handout for science teaching behavior courses. Buriram: Education Faculty of Buriram Rajabhat University. [in Thai]
Ministry of Education. (2008). Core Curriculum for Basic Education in 2008. Bangkok: Shipping and Packing Organization.[in Thai]Ministry of Education. (2017).Indicators and Core Learning Areas of Science. Bangkok: Shipping and Packing Organization.[in Thai]
Najang, K. (2011). Effects of using Model-Centered Instruction Sequence on ability in making Scientific Model and Concepts of Laws of Motion and Types of Motion of Upper Secondary School Students. (Master’s Degree Thesis).Chulalongkorn University, Faculty of Education, Curriculum and Instruction department, Science Education Program. [in Thai]
National Institute of Educational Testing Service. (2018). Summary of Ordinary National Educational Test 2017. Retrieved from http://www.newonetresult.niets.or.th/AnnouncementWeb/PDF/SummaryONETM6_2560.pdf. [in Thai]
National Institute of Educational Testing Service. (2018). Report of Ordinary National Educational Test of Mathayomsuksa 6 Students in Academic Year 2016. Retrieved from http://www.newonetresult.niets.or.th/AnnouncementWeb/Login.aspx. [in Thai]
National Science Education Standards. (1996). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Nuangchalerm, P.(2013). Teaching and learning research(2nd ed). Bankok: Chulalongkorn University. [in Thai]
Nujenjit, N. (2016) Enhancing Science Student Teachers’ Understanding of ScientificConcept in Topic of “Lunar Phenomena” Using Model-Based Learning with Socratic Method. Kasetsart Education Review, 31(3), 22-33. [in Thai].
Parinthawong, I. & Termtachatipongsa, P. (2014). Scientific Conceptual Change of Grade 7Students on Force and Motion Using Hewson & Hewson’s (2003) Conceptual Change Strategies Incorporated with Formative Assessment. Journal of Education Khon Kean University, 37(2),172-179. [in Thai]
Pasumart, S., Khaomek, P. & Sukprasertchai, T. (2015). Using Model-Based Learning (MBL) with Predict-Observe-Explain (POE) to Correct Scientific Misconception of Grade 10Students’ on Covalent Bonding : The National and International Graduate Research Conference 2016. Retrieved from https://gsbooks.gs.kku.ac.th/59/ingrc2016/pdf/HMO15.pdf. [in Thai]
Pongpeera, J. & Nuangchalerm, P. (2017). Learning Management Model for Changing Misconceptions in Science for High School Students. Ratchaphruek Journal, 15(2), 24-35. [in Thai]
Rompayom Wichaidit, P.(2015). Nature of chemistry and performing and instruction to be consistent with its nature. Srinakharinwirot Science Journal, 31(2), 187-199. [in Thai]
Schwarz, C.V. & White, B.Y. (2005). Metamodeling Knowledge: Developing Students’ Understanding of Scientific Modeling. Cognition and Instruction. 23(2),165-205.
Srichiangha, C. (2011). Developing Grade-11 Students’ Conceptions about Chemical Equilibrium and Attitude Towards Chemistry Through Model-Based Learning Activities. (Master’s Thesis). Kasetsart University, Faculty of Education, ScienceEducation.[in Thai]
Srisa-ard, B. (2003). Research Primary. Bangkok: Suveeriyasan. [in Thai]
Tanya, S. (2013). Educational Research Methodology. Nakhon Ratchasima: Nakhon Ratchasima Rajabhat University. [in Thai]
The Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology. (2016). PISA assessment summary 2015. Retrieved from https://pisathailand.ipst.ac.th/isbn-9789789955918/. [in Thai]
Treagust, D & Duit, R. (2008). Conceptual change: A discussion of theoretical, methodological and practical Challenges for science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3, 297-328.
Trilling, B. & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills : Learning for Life in Our Times. California: John Wiley & Sons.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
บทความทุกบทความเป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของวารสารคณะศึกษาศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยเกษตรศาสตร์ วิทยาเขตบางเขน
วารสารศึกษาศาสตร์ปริทัศน์ (Kasetsart Educational Review)
