The Feedback Model to Support Critical Writing Skill for Ninth-grade Students

Authors

  • Chanokporn Faksang คณะศึกษาศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยเกษตรศาสตร์
  • Thananun Thanarachataphoom
  • Chatsiri Piyapimonsit

Keywords:

The Feedback Model, Critical Writing Skill

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop teaching by using the Feedback Model and studying the students’ development after using the Feedback model in order to support critical writing skill for Ninth-grade students through action research. This action research consisted of 4 steps as follow: 1) Planning Stage, researcher designed the lesson plan which combined with 3 steps including warm up, practice, and conclusion. In each step integrated with the feedback model to support critical writing skill. 2) Acting Stage, researcher used the lesson plan to teach 40 ninth-grade students. 3) Observing Stage, researcher gathered data from practice test 1: descriptive writing and practice tests 2 - 4: critical writing. 4) Reflecting Stage, researcher analyzed students’ critical writing skills from exercises and improve or edit the other lesson plans.

          The research results indicated that 1) Teaching by using the feedback model consisted of feed up, checking for understanding, feedback, and feed forward. 2) Students’ Critical Writing is significantly developed: the development score of practice test 1 (descriptive writing) was 33.63 % (medium level), the development score of practice test 2 (Critical Writing) was 28.57 % (medium level), the development score of practice test 3 (Critical Writing) was 45.39 % (medium level), and the result of practice test 4 (Critical Writing) score was 59.02 % (high level).

References

References
Bureau of Academic Affairs and Educational Standards Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2014). Guidelines for measuring and evaluating learning outcomes According to the core curriculum of basic education, B.E. 2551. Bangkok: The Agricultural Cooperative Federation of Thailand. Limited. (in Thai)
Bureau of Academic Affairs and Educational Standards Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2005). Guidelines for the implementation of teaching and learning reform according to the intention of the Ministry of Education 2006. Bangkok: Ministry of Education. (in Thai)
Chotima Nooprick. (2017). Assessment for Learning: Questioning and Feedback to Enhance Learning. Journal of Education Silpakorn University. 13 (2): 18-30. (in Thai)
Daoruang Lumthong. (2010). The effects of feedback styles on visual of development: an application of feedback and feedforward approaches. Master of Education Program in Educational Measurement and Evaluation Chulalongkorn University. (in Thai)
Fasihah Arewae. (2012). Development of a peer Feedback Model to enhance Thai writing skill of Thai as a second language learner. Master of Education Program Chulalongkorn University. (in Thai)
Fisher, D., Grant, M., Frey, N., & Johnson, C. (2007). “Taking formative assessments schoolwide.” Educational Leadership. 65(4): 64–68.
Gavriel, J. (2013). Assessment for learning: A Wider (classroom-researched) Perspective is Important for Formative assessment and Self-directed learning in general practice. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Inc.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). “The power of feedback.” Review of Educational Research. 77: 81–112.
Senee Walaawan. (2014). Improve language skills. Bangkok: Suveeriyasarn. (in Thai)
Sirichai Kanjanawasee. (2001). Classical test theory. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Printing House. (in Thai)
The Ministry of Education. (2008). The Basic Education Core Curriculum B.E.2551 (A.D.2008). Bangkok: The Agricultural Cooperative Federation of Thailand.Limited. (in Thai)
Tunstall, P. and Gipps, C. (1996). “Teacher feedback to young children in formative assessment: A typology.” British Educational Research Journal. 22(4): 389-404.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-31