A Model to Enhance Innovator Teachers’ Competence With Integrative Strategies for Teachers Under Local Administrative Organization
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aimed 1) to develop a model for enhancing the capabilities of teachers as educational innovators using an integrated strategy for teachers under local administrative organizations, 2) to test the implementation of this model in real-world settings, and 3) to establish guidelines for strengthening the capacity of teachers as innovators. The developed model comprises five key components: 1) principles, 2) objectives, 3) content for designing and developing teacher innovators, 4) learning activities to promote teacher innovation, and 5) evaluation and assessment. The population for this study included five teachers from schools under local administrative organizations in the lower northern region, selected through random sampling. The research tools included in-depth interviews, questionnaires, and learning outcome assessments. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and t-tests. The results indicated that teachers who participated in the training exhibited significantly higher characteristics of educational innovators compared to before the training, with statistical significance at the .05 level. The development of these skills enabled teachers to design effective learning activities which focused on innovation. Promoting learning and innovation through professional learning communities (PLCs) allowed teachers to share knowledge and experiences, fostering an environment that encourages experimentation and creativity. The use of modern technology and teaching materials, along with financial support for teachers to develop and test teaching innovations, enhanced the effectiveness and engagement of the learning process. Continuous assessment and monitoring of teacher development enabled ongoing improvement and adaptation of teaching practices. Furthermore, the promotion of research and professional development empowered teachers to continually refine their teaching methods.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Journal of Information and Learning is operated by the Office of Academic Resources, Prince of Songkla University. All articles published in the journal are protected by Thailand copyright law. This copyright covers the exclusive rights to share, reproduce and distribute the article, including in electronic forms, reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, or similar. Authors own copyrights in the works they have created as well as the Office of Academic Resources. The Journal reserves the right to edit the language of papers accepted for publication for clarity and correctness, as well as to make formal changes to ensure compliance with the journal's guidelines. All authors must take public responsibility for the content of their paper.
References
Blendata. (2021, April 25). Big data + AI kāntham ngā nō̜rō̜wō̜ nakha ʻong sutyō̜t theknōlōyī thī chūai yok radap thurakit hai phrō̜m thuk kān khǣng khan [Big data + AI: The synergy of cutting-edge technologies for business advancement in a competitive world. https://www.blendata.co/big-data-ai-การทำงานร่วมกันของ-2-สุ
Blendata. (2024, April 25). Yuk Society 5.0 khư̄ ʻarai ? theknōlōyī mī botbāt kap chīwit khǣ nai ? thammai ? thura kit tō̜ ʻong rē ngō̜ prap tūa trīam rap kān plīanplǣng [What is the Society 5.0 era? How much does technology play a role in life? Why? Businesses must quickly adapt and prepare for change]. https://www.blendata.co/ยุค-society-5-0-คืออะไร-เทคโนโลยีจ
Burns, T., & Gottschalk, F. (2020). Education in the digital age: Healthy and happy children, educational research and innovation. OECD.
Chambers, R. (1997). Whose reality counts? Putting the first last. Intermediate Technology Publications.
Chumphae, T. N. (2021). Nawattakō̜n [Innovator]. Knowledge Sharing. https://www.thailibrary.in.th/2021/04/07/innovator
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Kappa Delta Pi.
Fullan, M., & Langworthy, M. (2014). A rich seam: How new pedagogies find deep learning. Pearson.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books.
Jantuem, T., & Srivichain, T. (2019). Development a program to enhance teacher's to use and develop innovative technologies for learning of school local administration organization. Sisaket Rajabhat University Journal, 13(2), 13-25. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sskrujournal/article/view/210624
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
Kurusapha: Secretariat Office of the Teachers’ Council of Thailand. (2018). Report on professional development for teachers. Kurusapha.
Masaharu, K. (2021, March). Smart mobility challenge. Public Relations Office Government of Japan. https://www.gov-online.go.jp/eng/publicity/book/hlj/html/202103/202103_01_en.html
Piaget, J. (1969). Science of education and the psychology of the child. Viking Press.
Stasewitsch, E., Dokuka, S., & Kaufeld, S. (2022) Promoting educational innovations and change through networks between higher education teachers. Tertiary Education and Management, 28(1), 61-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233-021-09086-0
Thipsuwun, N., Boonchit, Y., & Jaroensuk, B. (2022). Teacher development in creating learning management innovation at Maharat Ban Sangaroon School under Suratthani Primary Education Service Area Office 2. SRU Intellectual Repository. http://www.ir.sru.ac.th/bitstream/123456789/943/1/is_adm_65nuntida.pdf
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. Jossey-Bass.